
|
Originally Posted by Glass
Just a side note: I would love to see some of the alliance raiders who are used to having paladins, start running thier groups with no paladins and substitute shaman instead just to get a taste. It just boggles the mind (from a horde perspective) to see someone say they've never had to worry about aggro. Make sure you run a group with shaman that drops soe and wf at all times and make sure you have no paladins.
A few months before they announced the paladin/shaman availability a buddy of ours (we all work together) who is in an alliance raiding guild (and has never played horde aside from herbing alts) actually said to us "paladins don't make that big of a difference, you wouldn't even notice". We could have slapped him. Nevermind the fact that my first 60 was a paladin and I was in a guild with him...
We asked him how many 40 mans he'd run without paladins.. his response was "I think we did ony one time with only one paladin one time". They were on the emps in aq40 at the time (it was the highest instance in the game then). :(
Sorry to digress...
|
By the same token the alliance rogues are drooling over a shaman buffing the hell out of them. ;) I grouped my rogue and shaman for pling quickly through the lower levels and once the shaman got windfury... man it was sick. It was only rank one so there was almost no atk bonus just a free swing, but was killing level 40 elites in SM on a single SS and then procs from windfury, sword spec and HoJ.
Still, even without salv a good tank is nearly impossible to pull agro off of. My blessing choice was always might, kings, salv in that order. It wasn't common for me to be without salv, but it wasn't unheard of either.