Originally Posted by HaklePrime
I really don't see how anyone has a problem seeing what Sadris is explaining.
|
I don't think anyone has a problem with Sadris's explanation - it's pretty clear, druid weapons scale more slowly than 2Hers. I think the point of contention (or at least, my point of contention) is whether this actually matters in any real way. The weapon damage itself is not the sole determiner of the effectiveness of a class; it's certainly a large contributer, but their are many other factors that come into play; the statistics provided by other gear contribute. The multipliers gained through talents (or not) contribute. The other available roles for the class contribute.
My argument is that, even though druid weapons don't scale as well, their aggro generation in bear and dps in cat may scale just as well, and, moreover, *even if* their damage doesn't scale quite as well as a rogue's, it doesn't really need to; as long as druids do more damage than prot warriors in dps gear, and tank better than fury warriors in tank gear, there will be a spot for them in raids as offtanks.
Long story short? I have no problem with Sadris's conclusions about druid weapons. I simply haven't seen anything that shows that the inferior scaling actually matters.