Originally Posted by Dots
I disagree. While the level of coordination might be different, it was still harder to get the 2v2 to 2250 than the 5v5 to 1900.
|
Not entirely true. Rating point for rating point 2x2 is easier than 5x5 for several reason. Gimmick teams and point gaming are more effective in 2x2 but the biggest factor is the size of the pool. My BG has ~1400 5x5 teams and around 8k 2x2 teams. #1 in 2x2 is 2500+ but in 5x5 it's barely over 2300.
I agree that 2250 in 2's is harder than 1900 in 5's, but I think 2100 in 5's is roughly equal and maybe slightly harder to maintain than 2250 in 2's.