Mackalicious

I have been trolling these forums for sometime now. I have seen many flip flop type answers on the utility of Blood frenzy in a raid. Initially my spec contained what I felt was the "ideal" raid buffer. I currently run an SSC/TK quality raid in which I am the sole dps warrior. My spec contained Blood frenzy, imp demo shout, and 5/5 commanding presence with a Solarion trinket. I felt I was doing my raid a great justice, even though I was falling short on the meters. I average about 8th to 11th on WWS.

After a short while I decided to respec fury and test my findings. Comparing a WWS of two-handed MS with blood frenzy vs. fury. I am curious on how my math can be applied. I added up the total dmg done of each physical damage source for that given night. Then I did the same for the fury WWS. I took the total amount of damage done on the MS WWS, and multiplied it by .04, assuming a flat 4% damage increase and 100% debuff uptime. End results showed that being specced fury I end up doing a total of 656 985 more damage then the MS spec. That would have included my total damage done as MS in addition to the total physical damage done multiplied by .04. So to clarify, fury's total out damaged MS’s damage even after adding the 4 % to MS’ total damage done.

I am unsure about my math. The more I look at encounters, the more I question blood frenzy. For example, my average crit. % is about 45% fully raid buffed. That would hurt my blood frenzy up time. Also, mobs who are immune to bleed affect.

Can anyone help me out deciding which spec would help my raid overall? .

I currently usually run with this given set up.

One enhancement shaman, three hunters, two prot warriors, one feral, one rogue, one dps warrior, one prot paladin, and finally one ret paladin. Any help would be great. At the moment I am leaning more toward fury. I am usually first or second DPS wise and overall raid damage seems to improve while specced fury. I just want to make sure I am on the right track and not talking out my ass.