Werelds, your BT vs execute comparison is probably correct, what it boils down to is that at 30+ rage BT is more rage efficient than Execute (this is in the Compendium already Waagaa, read the first post). However you make some false assumptions regarding rage and weapon speeds.
|
If you're sitting at 100 rage permanently in the <20% region, you'll get more DPS done by switching to slower weapons. Slightly less rage income, but overall it'll increase your damage when you take windfury and such into account.
|
If you're not using WW during execute phase this is just not true. Windfury is
not better with slow weapons. The point in using fast weapons for execute is that you have
a) less risk of getting over the rage cap, rage come in small chunks rather than big
b) bigger chance of getting above 12/15 rage per gcd.
What I think Mjollnir meant was that if you're stuck with 100 rage every gcd (or rather that the next swing will take you over 100) you will be better off using execute every gcd to really use up all the rage. If rage efficiency is not important a 100 rage execute will still hit a lot harder than BT.
Compare these two situations (assuming 3900 AP):
1. You get 30 rage per GCD. You can do either 1 BT or 1 30 rage execute per gcd (3900*0.45=1755 vs 925+21*18=1303). BT wins clearly.
2. You get 100 rage per GCD. You can do either 1 BT (wasting 70 rage per gcd) or 1 100 rage execute (1755 vs 2773). Execute is the clear winner.
You could of course make use of HS as well, this would make things a bit better for BT, but at 100 rage per gcd I don't think anything beats Execute. And using HS will mean that your rage generation for the next gcd is more than halfed.