 |
04/24/07, 2:34 PM
|
#151
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
After seeing the loot from a couple of boss kills, it appears that they drop (or have a chance of) dropping an epic trade skill pattern. So far, the three that have been posted here have been blacksmithing, and each has a passive haste buff.
If you look up the pattern on Thottbot you can see that the item with the ID 32428 is the Heart of Darkness.
From here, we can look at other unknown trade skill patterns to see other patterns using this (that aren't the shadow resistance gear from the Ashtongue Deathsworn).
For tailoring:
Swiftheal Wraps
Swiftheal Mantle
Mantle of Nimble Thought
Bracers of Nimble Thought
For leatherworking:
Bracers of Renewed Life
Shoulderpads of Renewed Life
Swiftstrike Bracers
Swiftstrike Shoulders
Bindings of Lightning Reflexes
Shoulders of Lightning Reflexes
Living Earth Bindings
Living Earth Shoulders
For blacksmithing:
Swiftsteel Bracers
Swiftsteel Shoulders
Dawnsteel Bracers
Dawnsteel Shoulders
Bracers appear to be BOE, shoulders BOP. Judging by what we've seen, and by the names of the unknown items, they would all appear to have passive haste or spell haste on them.
|
|
|
|
|
04/24/07, 2:39 PM
|
#152
|
|
Great Tiger
Worgen Death Knight
Executus
|
Originally Posted by Xellotath
*snip*
Dawnsteel Bracers
Dawnsteel Shoulders
Bracers appear to be BOE, shoulders BOP. Judging by what we've seen, and by the names of the unknown items, they would all appear to have passive haste or spell haste on them.
|
Say it ain't so!... a reason to go blacksmith for a Holy Paladin? I need to check if the sky is falling hold on. If they are indeed BOP, time for me to ditch herbalism and start the long hard road to 375 smithing on a healer's budget!
Is it possible to data-mine anymore for confirmation on BOP Mantle?
|
|
|
|
|
04/24/07, 2:46 PM
|
#153
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
Right now that was just going off the assumption that there was a pattern with the three that dropped already.
The two bracer patterns that dropped were both BOP patterns, and the items they made were BOE.
The shoulder pattern that dropped was not BOP, but the item it made was.
Once more patterns are found that will fill out, but going from existing things it is fairly safe to assume that this is the case.
|
|
|
|
|
04/24/07, 7:25 PM
|
#154
|
|
Don Flamenco
Orc Shaman
Azjol-Nerub (EU)
|
Either that or they just mislabeled the BOP and BOE on the items 
|
|
|
|
|
04/24/07, 9:06 PM
|
#155
|
|
King Hippo
Orc Warlock
Mazrigos (EU)
|
Dear god the current list has more leatherworking recipes than both other crafting professions. Could we finally be getting some more love?
First two sound like healing leather, then four hunter/shaman items, then 2 healshaman items. Very excited, can't wait 
|
|
|
|
|
04/24/07, 9:49 PM
|
#156
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
Originally Posted by Stopokingme
Either that or they just mislabeled the BOP and BOE on the items 
|
Maybe. But then again the 2 piece Nether Vortex items are one BoP (boots) and one BoE (belt).
|
|
|
|
|
04/25/07, 6:05 AM
|
#157
|
|
Ginakursia
Goblin Warlock
No WoW Account (EU)
|
Originally Posted by Rane
Dear god the current list has more leatherworking recipes than both other crafting professions. Could we finally be getting some more love?
First two sound like healing leather, then four hunter/shaman items, then 2 healshaman items. Very excited, can't wait 
|
I'm pretty sure that's mostly because Leatherworking is going to provide both Leather and Mail variations of these passive haste items. Four leather items, two healing, two melee, four mail items, two healing, two melee.
|
|
|
|
|
04/25/07, 6:56 AM
|
#158
|
|
Soda Popinski
|
Originally Posted by Chicken
I'm pretty sure that's mostly because Leatherworking is going to provide both Leather and Mail variations of these passive haste items. Four leather items, two healing, two melee, four mail items, two healing, two melee.
|
Damn, here I was hoping one of those sets would be feral, I could use some good bracers 
Did anyone find any of the patterns already except for the BS ones?
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 12:26 AM
|
#159
|
|
Bald Bull
Night Elf Druid
Stormreaver
|
Gorefiend Drops from Impervious raid in BT today.
Finally Blizzard is really getting the idea with weapon skill and its use as a tanking attribute 
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 12:41 AM
|
#160
|
|
Bald Bull
Tauren Warrior
Kil'Jaeden
|
Only it still costs a bit too much.
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 12:44 AM
|
#161
|
|
Bald Bull
Night Elf Druid
Stormreaver
|
Eh its cheaper than Hit Rating for avoidance reduction.
For druids its also the cheapest DPS booster on bosses.
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 12:59 AM
|
#162
|
|
Bald Bull
Night Elf Druid
Stormreaver
|
Just for number comparison
0.23% Avoidance Reduction per point of Weapon Skill Rating (0.2% Miss 0.1% Dodge 0.6% parry per Weapon Skill so 0.9% per Weapon Skill and 3.9 Rating per Skill so 0.9%/3.9=~0.23%)
0.06% Avoidance Reduction per point of Hit Rating (1% Hit per 15.8 Rating so 1/15.8=~0.06%)
So Weapon Skill rating is roughly 4 times more valuable than Hit Rating for avoidance reduction while tanking (most of the reduction comes in the form of parry reduction).
The amount of reductions is based on Crezax's numbers from here http://forums.wow-europe.com/thread....geNo=1&sid=1#2
Now a lot of that is based on is the numbers Crezax stated as being true. The tests in the class mechanics forum show it at least somewhat close to the values at least. Or close enough the rogues are using it for their DPS spreadsheets
Edit: So for comparison those gloves have 4.85% avoidance reduction effectively on them which you can kinda think of being almost as good as the 4 piece set bonus from dreadnaught for landing those first few hits.
Last edited by Cryect : 05/08/07 at 1:37 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 1:11 AM
|
#163
|
|
Great Tiger
|
Newly-buffed Nethervoid Cloak:

|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 2:23 AM
|
#164
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
Originally Posted by Cryect
So Weapon Skill rating is roughly 4 times more valuable than Hit Rating for avoidance reduction while tanking (most of the reduction comes in the form of parry reduction).
|
And correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't parry reduction the best sort of avoidance reduction, due to the "thrash" effect of mob parrying?
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 2:34 AM
|
#165
|
|
King Hippo
Human Paladin
Argent Dawn (EU)
|
After seeing those gloves, if it was possible for a guy to miscarry, I think I just did.
What an amazing combination of stats on a pair of tanking gloves but I have just one question;
...recoloured Lawbringer or Might?
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 2:36 AM
|
#166
|
|
Bald Bull
Night Elf Druid
Stormreaver
|
Originally Posted by Beliandra
And correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't parry reduction the best sort of avoidance reduction, due to the "thrash" effect of mob parrying?
|
No, you are right (each parry reduces weapon swing time by 40% for max of 2 times down to 20% swing time most mobs have 2 second swing time so would be 0,4 seconds worst case). But I was just talking in general since a lot of warrior like the idea of +hit but haven't fully grasped how bad +hit is in comparison to Weapon Skill yet.
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 2:41 AM
|
#167
|
|
Bald Bull
Tauren Warrior
Kil'Jaeden
|
Originally Posted by Cryect
0.23% Avoidance Reduction per point of Weapon Skill Rating (0.2% Miss 0.1% Dodge 0.6% parry per Weapon Skill so 0.9% per Weapon Skill and 3.9 Rating per Skill so 0.9%/3.9=~0.23%)
0.06% Avoidance Reduction per point of Hit Rating (1% Hit per 15.8 Rating so 1/15.8=~0.06%)
|
Wait,
Isn't 1 point of weapon skill 0.04% miss, dodge, parry, block, crit?
When I put on my mallet of tides my crit goes up exactly 0.12% for 3 skill points.
And its about 4 skill rating per skill point?
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 2:44 AM
|
#168
|
|
Bald Bull
Tauren Warrior
Kil'Jaeden
|
The blue post:
I wouldn't say it's useless.
Let's say you increase your weapon skill by 4.
Against a mob 3 levels higher than you, you get: 0.8% lower chance to miss, 0,4% lower chance to get dodged, 2,4% to be parried, and a 0,8% higher chance to crit. That means a 4,8% net increase.
|
Those numbers are so much higher than anything I've ever seen before... In fact, 4 skill rating should be 0.48% more chance to hit, and his numbers are 4.8%? Kinda suspicious... Maybe my numbers are off by a magnitude, but thats why I said it's weak in the first place. I put specifically on the suggestions on the PTR to increase the power of skill rating ten fold - if those numbers are right, then I take it back, its very good!
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 2:45 AM
|
#169
|
|
Mike Tyson
|
Originally Posted by Quigon
Wait,
Isn't 1 point of weapon skill 0.04% miss, dodge, parry, block, crit?
When I put on my mallet of tides my crit goes up exactly 0.12% for 3 skill points.
And its about 4 skill rating per skill point?
|
Yes on the latter, no on the former. At some point (TBC? v2.0 maybe?) weapon skill was changed to have much larger effects on avoidance mitigation. It's a solid PvE stat and it's fantastic for tanks because tanks get parried while DPS classes shouldn't. We first noticed this by comparing WWS parses of an orc tank using a blacksmithing axe to tank vs. a King's Defender. He literally had 4-5% fewer parries/misses/dodges total.
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 2:45 AM
|
#170
|
|
Bald Bull
Night Elf Druid
Stormreaver
|
Originally Posted by Russta
After seeing those gloves, if it was possible for a guy to miscarry, I think I just did.
What an amazing combination of stats on a pair of tanking gloves but I have just one question;
...recoloured Lawbringer or Might?
|
Haha, one second I will check.
I have to say so far I like the fights in BT three of them seemed very doable but they were also ones tested beforehand decent amount (Supremeus I assume is doable as well but we didn't have FR so he just DT'ed it after one try).
The Akama vs Akama fight which seems we appear to have been maybe the first to test (or at least heard of fighting him) was a little out of tune I felt (its a zerg style burn fight in the veins of say Nef Phase 1).
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 2:48 AM
|
#171
|
|
Bald Bull
Tauren Warrior
Kil'Jaeden
|
Originally Posted by Praetorian
Yes on the latter, no on the former. At some point (TBC? v2.0 maybe?) weapon skill was changed to have much larger effects on avoidance mitigation. It's a solid PvE stat and it's fantastic for tanks because tanks get parried while DPS classes shouldn't. We first noticed this by comparing WWS parses of an orc tank using a blacksmithing axe to tank vs. a King's Defender. He literally had 4-5% fewer parries/misses/dodges total.
|
Wow, I'm amazed - slightly amazing that I completely missed this as well. That is very good to know. Guess my hammer is that much more valuable. Thank you guys 
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 2:52 AM
|
#172
|
|
Piston Honda
Murloc Warrior
Hellscream
|
I saw those gloves and I'm pretty excited about them, but to be honest its definately wasteful to budget for weapon skill for a whole bunch of weapon types, when you could have 1 and get more stats instead. It does however show they are at least thinking about the kinds of items which would have an impact on that aspect of tanking.
Personally I'd be in favor of a universal weapon skill stat, or making each cost a lot less in the budget, since realistically you can only ever benefit from 1 stat at any given time. Regardless those gloves are likely to outperform pretty much any tanking gloves we're likely to get for the rest of the expansion.
Edit: actually looking at them again, the weapon skill probably doesn't take up all of that much in the budget. The item still has a fair bit of defense, a lot of sta and a respectable amount of block value, so really there isn't much loss in stats for weapon skill
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 2:53 AM
|
#173
|
|
Bald Bull
Tauren Warrior
Kil'Jaeden
|
In that situation don't they only attribute point distribution for 1 weapon type - even though multiple are listed, similar to Eye of Nerub? Anyone have an Item calculator to verify?
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 2:54 AM
|
#174
|
|
Mike Tyson
|
I always thought that when they put multiple +skill types on a single item, the additional types didn't cost extra.
|
|
|
|
|
05/08/07, 2:57 AM
|
#175
|
|
In want of more brains
Tauren Druid
Kilrogg (EU)
|
Nevermind.
Last edited by Ulfgar : 05/08/07 at 2:58 AM.
Reason: superfluous
|
|
|
|
|
|