Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Public Discussion » Public Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06/03/07, 9:21 PM   #61
Jebraltar
King Hippo
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Staghelm
Originally Posted by Lord BEEF View Post
For all classes to be viable tanks they need to either move paladins to the druid model where they're good at a secondary role when not performing their primary, or dethrone warriors as the best main tank and have paladins be as good as prot warriors, which I don't think is the best solution.
Agreed.

Personally I'd "feralize" the paladin protection tree such that the talents that improve tanking also improve healing to some extent (not nearly to the level which holy does of course). Things like giving mana/5 based on a % of your block value, additional stamina from your +damage gear or whatever.
The biggest problem with this is that it's the approach that Blizzard seems to have abandoned - I'm not wholly convinced that the useless mana / 5 clogging up the various Paladin tanking sets was entirely a mistake. My guess is that they genuinely thought that they could make Paladins able to tank and heal in the same gear. The problem was that rather than doing this by making tanking stats help healing / vice versa, they tried to do it wholly by itemization and simply made it fail.

To be honest, that probably made things worse - Paladin tanking is somewhat more viable thanks to the 2.1 changes. It's still definitely lacking compared to both of the other classes, but there is some potential for a Paladin MT for a guild lacking (for whatever reason) a good Warrior MT. Hell, our guild's MT has cursed a few times because I linked him Righteous Shoulders and Justicar Crown.

The problem is that although they've switched approaches from "we'll try to get pallies to be healers/offtanks," they did so to avoid the problems that approach was causing, and neglected to address the problems facing the new approach while implementing it. Either switching the tree around considerably or giving Paladins the tools they need to MT would work fine. (Eg: About a thousand more health, useful mitigation tools.)

I think we're going to have to agree to disagree on these. I could continue on about how I've seen paladins both fear and tank Moroes (thanks 5-10 sec break while he vanishes), how the curse from Attumen can still be dispelled (though I must say I didn't realize it affected spells - I'll have to pay more attention to the tooltip), how disarm is limited both in use and in damage reduction, etc. But it doesn't really seem like this is a productive line of discussion, since you insist that they're significant contributors to the difference in tanking ability. I don't know what else to say.
The problem is that there are useful abilities provided by a protection warrior tanking a mob, and there are very few, if any, such abilities provided to others. One fear per Vanish on Moroes is pretty sad crowd control.

When you benefit from using a tank, your benefit usually comes from having a Warrior tank. Are they all gamebreakers? Of course not. Fear's the only dealbreaker present in the raid game, and even that's only for Horde. Still, when choosing who tanks a mob, the rational choice is to pick the one whose abilities have the most impact. I'm a better choice for tanking Shattered Halls because there are limited tank slots and having a tank controlling the adds is actually quite useful. There's nothing like that in the raid game, however, which is the point I'm trying to make. Nothing in the raid game says "Bring a Paladin!" Several encounters, however, by having techniques that Warriors are uniquely suited to countering, say "Bring a Warrior!"

(well, just Nightbane from what I can see)
Archimonde.

Come on, it's like saying "the prot paladin can cast blessings even if he's not tanking!" Neither of these things is a good enough justification for bringing tank who's not tanking. Yeah, you save the MT a bit of threat, and yeah, you let the DPS warriors spend every last point of their rage on DPS, as opposed to only 95%...but the fact of the matter is that when you say that, what you really mean is "Since Protection warriors aren't really contributing anything meaningful while not tanking, they're free to handle the basic tasks that any warrior can perform".
Bingo! What I was saying was a response to the repeated claims of "Well, no one would bring a Protection Warrior any more if pallies were close because Protection Paladins have more utility when not tanking!" It is repeatedly flatly stated that Protection Paladins bring substantially more utility, but the claim lacks validity.

In particular:
Originally Posted by Crowl
At the end of the day, both pallys and druids offer a number of advantages and a lot more utility than a prot warrior so unless that imbalance was also addressed there is no call to address the minor imbalance in MT'ing ability that a prot warrior has.
Familiar?

I really do wish the Devastate change from last patch had gone live, so that Prot Warriors would have a chance at at least being somewhat useful when not tanking. Right now, it's a big handicap for them. That's one point where Druids really excel--our primary tanking Druid, for instance, has pulled nearly 700 DPS on Gruul with a simple gear swap and no consumables.
While the change was cool and demonstrated that Blizzard was paying attention to the Protection Warrior complaints, there's no question that Devastate was far, far too powerful with the considered change, especially for soloing.


Beef's proposal is almost certainly the best one, though - "feralization" of Protection Paladins. Make Intellect increase dodge (thus making Paladin tanking stats go Spell Damage/Intellect for threat, Intellect/Stamina for mitigation, similar to to the way Strength/Agility/Stamina work for Warriors), add healing abilities to the tanking talents. The only foreseeable problem with this is that, unlike Druids, Paladins can get both benefits at the same time. The best answer I've come up with for this has been "Make Righteous Fury increase Holy spell threat by 200%j and reduce damage/healing done by 50%." Still makes "heal-tanking" pretty unfeasible, and makes for a "tankform"-esque ability that allows more buffs to healing in the Protection tree without making it the "spec this for awesomeness" tree. The biggest side effect is losing the Righteous Fury functionality in Aran and Nightbane, so far as I can tell. (Added bonus: Spiritual Attunement only active while Righteous Fury is up - allows the ability to be buffed without making Paladin healing entirely ridiculous.)

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/04/07, 2:13 AM   #62
Shalcker
Von Kaiser
 
Human Paladin
 
Wildhammer (EU)
The point of paladin tanking, judging by 2.1 changes, is taking steady damage without ANY huge streaks from crushings - even when mob get hasted due to parry, phase changes, or thrash-like abilities. In theory that allows healers to use stable and efficient heal rotations once encounter is learned, and maybe even exchange one backup healer (who is there just in case of "oh shit" moment, and mostly overheals) for dps. And then, if warrior is in danger of losing shield block in particular encounter, paladin gets more HS charges spent, generating more threat and rising threat-cap for dps compared to warrior. If you look at it this way, assuming that devs think this goal is reached, having health equal or close to warrior makes you superior right away, so it's unlikely to happen. Hell, they might think you're already superior for some encounters, just need different tactics from warrior tanking.

As for "oh shit", just removing deaggro portion from bubble will instantly make paladin's "oh shit" button noticably better then warrior's (10 sec of immunity on 5 m cooldown (that's fear immunity too btw) vs 10 sec (15 talented) of 75% damage on 30m cooldown). And it's not like it'll significantly change any encounter too...

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/04/07, 2:23 AM   #63
MeCh
Fail is the mind killer
 
MeCh's Avatar
 
Oppression
Gnome Death Knight
 
No WoW Account
The legacy of Thunderfury shall forever augment the place of the tanking classes.

The ability to mitigate that much damage is pretty spectacular.

With the fallout and implementation of an upgraded thunderclap, drurids and paladins may need similar mitigation abilities.

Paladins already get an oshit button in the form of LOH.

Avenging shield is such a niche ability, it doesn't hold up against mangle or devastate.

United States Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/04/07, 2:45 AM   #64
Mearis
Mr. Sandman
 
Mearis's Avatar
 
Dwarf Priest
 
Defias Brotherhood (EU)
Thunderclap isn't a tanking warrior ability, any more than blessings are a protection paladin ability. Any warrior in the raid can keep up thunderclap, reguarding thunderclap as a perk brought by a prot warrior is naive.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/04/07, 3:01 AM   #65
MeCh
Fail is the mind killer
 
MeCh's Avatar
 
Oppression
Gnome Death Knight
 
No WoW Account
I was more of point it as a perk of having a warrior over the other classes in reference to werebeef's alternate roles.

Also I'm concerned that Blizzard might implement a fix by introducing another overpowered in the game to "balance".

United States Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/04/07, 4:26 AM   #66
Daboran
King Hippo
 
Daboran's Avatar
 
Tauren Druid
 
Twisting Nether (EU)
Originally Posted by MeCh View Post
The legacy of Thunderfury shall forever augment the place of the tanking classes.

The ability to mitigate that much damage is pretty spectacular.

With the fallout and implementation of an upgraded thunderclap, drurids and paladins may need similar mitigation abilities.

Paladins already get an oshit button in the form of LOH.

Avenging shield is such a niche ability, it doesn't hold up against mangle or devastate.

On a slight derail, the Thunderfury saga continues to this day. We are now farming Garr every week (we have 4 of the other half scattered through our Warrior ranks :boggle: ).

Our guild MT pre-TBC who had Thunderfury is taking an extended break from the game and with many SSC mobs being immune to T/Clap for us it's worth the effort. They should just create an upgrade questline for it and be done with it.

Last edited by Daboran : 06/04/07 at 5:27 AM.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/04/07, 5:07 AM   #67
Wraithlin
Mr. Sandman
 
Wraithlin's Avatar
 
Orc Death Knight
 
Arathor (EU)
Originally Posted by Savos View Post
In regard to protection warrior damage in a non-tank role:

http://www.lossendil.com/wws/?report=yqz2inh4izqqc (until June 18th or so)

Now, I'm not that great at doing damage really and don't have the gear for it (blues/green quest rewards). Only 317 DPS. I can barely beat a Beastmastery hunter pet (Bowmin). I suppose I can get better though I don't generally practice raid DPS roles very often.

Defac and Adrik both running Arms at the time, otherwise would have moved up a significant number of places.
What is this ment to show other than the rather obvious "If I wear blues/ greens, then the dps'ers in large amounts of T4/T5 beat me at dpsing". You haven't given any context for that meter at all, most importantly were you even in a group with a shaman/feral druid for buff ? You already admit you havent practised your dps role, so what is the chance you put out an effetive dps cyle compared to others in your raid who dps more regularly ?

Posts like this are less than useless because they are downright deceptive and usually posted in such a way as to mislead.

Last edited by Wraithlin : 06/04/07 at 5:16 AM.

Wales Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/04/07, 6:02 AM   #68
Crowl
Soda Popinski
 
Crowl
Night Elf Warrior
 
No WoW Account (EU)
Originally Posted by Jayde View Post
I really do wish the Devastate change from last patch had gone live, so that Prot Warriors would have a chance at at least being somewhat useful when not tanking. Right now, it's a big handicap for them. That's one point where Druids really excel--our primary tanking Druid, for instance, has pulled nearly 700 DPS on Gruul with a simple gear swap and no consumables.
The idiotic thing was the speed that they dumped the change, if it was doing too much damage they had plenty of time to tweak things in order to give prot a boost without making it an option as mainstream dps.

In my guild we have a lot of warriors that want to be prot for heroics and don't seem inclined to try more hybrid specs, but with our progression level we just don't have raiding for more than about 3 prot warriors a week, so theres a lot of rotation as we just can't afford to take most of them on raids.


In regard to the prospect of Prot Paladin "hybridization", I'd say that it might not be a bad thing to see more of this in both Paladin and Warrior trees really. I guess the issue in regard to Warriors is that with 2 trees already dedicated to "damage", it feels a bit strange to have damage-oriented elements in Prot too--but, realistically, something needs to be done about the inability to stack Prot Warriors to any resonable degree.
The thing with boosting prot pallys or warriors is that nobody expects them to perform at a similar level to their holy or dps specced equivalents, they just need enough of a boost that they are not a liability in fights where they aren't needed to tank.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/04/07, 6:10 AM   #69
Plea
Don Flamenco
 
Undead Mage
 
Twisting Nether (EU)
Yet it doesnt change the fact that devastate dps is shit; even when you reach an insane 500 dps you will be threat capped; and you will not be able to improve any further. We may predict some changes like revenge took though.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/04/07, 6:15 AM   #70
Cathela
Still Bald Bull
 
Cathela's Avatar
 
Human Paladin
 
Earthen Ring
Originally Posted by Mearis View Post
Thunderclap isn't a tanking warrior ability, any more than blessings are a protection paladin ability. Any warrior in the raid can keep up thunderclap, reguarding thunderclap as a perk brought by a prot warrior is naive.
Not if you've got multiple mobs that need to be tanked.

My comrades are my weapons, and I am their shield.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/04/07, 6:40 AM   #71
Jayde
Great Tiger
 
Jayde's Avatar
 
Night Elf Warrior
 
Silvermoon (EU)
Originally Posted by Crowl View Post
The idiotic thing was the speed that they dumped the change, if it was doing too much damage they had plenty of time to tweak things in order to give prot a boost without making it an option as mainstream dps.
I actually think the reaction to the change was a bit hasty, personally. Seemed a lot of backlash was caused by that one video doing crazy DPS against a Blasted Lands infinite HP mob, but honestly I found that example to be quite bunk. Fighting against a mob 14 levels lower than you with infinite HP, pre-stacked with 5 sunders, lots of buffs, and popping Recklessness is hardly an example of an "average" situation. Realistically, it was raising the damage contributed by Devastate by 80% or so (perhaps less) and as Prot Warriors don't do any notable raid DPS now, I doubt they would have been doing "insane" DPS even with the change.

Just my 2 cents, but at the very least I wish they would have made an effort to come up with a solution rather than basically saying, "Well, we knew Prot DPS needed some love...but this isn't working so we'll just give up."

As for the Thunderclap/Demo Shout issue, we have a very active DPS Warrior (rare breed nowadays, seems like) who is capable of keeping all of those up as needed. So, in that way, it doesn't matter too much who we have MTing various encounters. I still tend to lean towards Warriors though, simply due to them being unable to do much of anything else if they aren't tanking.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/04/07, 6:53 AM   #72
Crowl
Soda Popinski
 
Crowl
Night Elf Warrior
 
No WoW Account (EU)
The damage boost to devastate would be nice, but if they do revisit it that in the future the other thing I would like to see from that skill would be for it to apply sunders and not simply refresh them.

As far as thunderclap, I have just got into the habit to apply/reapply it automatically these days even in 25 man stuff since you won't tend to have anyone else to do it for you in 5/10 man stuff.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/04/07, 7:10 AM   #73
• Chicken
Mod
 
Chicken's Avatar
 
Gnome Monk
 
Azjol-Nerub (EU)
Originally Posted by Cathela View Post
This would be fantastic, and I'd welcome it. I wouldn't mind being a demonstrably inferior tank to a warrior/druid in most situations if speccing that way didn't also have such an enormous negative effect on my healing.

Let us tank better, or let us hybridize better. Either way works for me.
I also support better Hybridization for Protadins, that seems a better route to go than simply boosting our tanking capability. As far as I'm concerned, if we were to look at the Paladin's current tanking ability we'd be fine if we had some better Hybridization options; Druids already fill the tank first, DPS later variation, Paladins would fit neatly into the tank first, Heal later variation.

I rather liked the Righteous Fury suggestion someone posted above as well, though something like that would have to be carefully implemented since it'd bring a change to how people handle Nightbane and Morogrim. Having tanking stats provide other boosts in regards to healing would be good too, as well as possibly the other way around.

Netherlands Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/04/07, 7:49 AM   #74
Dots
Don Flamenco
 
Pandaren Warrior
 
Dentarg (EU)
Originally Posted by Cathela View Post
Not if you've got multiple mobs that need to be tanked.
The point was a different one. Paladins already are the best multiple mob tanks, druids are quite good at it as well. Thunderclap just happens to double as a major boss debuff and decent ability to tank multiple mobs.

Originally Posted by Daboran View Post
Our guild MT pre-TBC who had Thunderfury is taking an extended break from the game and with many SSC mobs being immune to T/Clap for us it's worth the effort. They should just create an upgrade questline for it and be done with it.
Not sure what your warriors are doing, but I can't think of a single mob in SSC that is immune to TC. Farming for Thunderfury isn't really worth it anymore with comparable or perhaps better weapons out there.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/04/07, 8:18 AM   #75
Cathela
Still Bald Bull
 
Cathela's Avatar
 
Human Paladin
 
Earthen Ring
Originally Posted by Dots View Post
The point was a different one. Paladins already are the best multiple mob tanks, druids are quite good at it as well. Thunderclap just happens to double as a major boss debuff and decent ability to tank multiple mobs.
/sigh

Let me rephrase:

If you've got multiple mobs, each of which needs to be singly tanked, Thunderclap is a legitimate advantage for a warrior tank.

EDIT: Not necessarily single tanking. More generally, what I'm referring to is any situation where you need multiple tanks tanking different things in different places.

Last edited by Cathela : 06/04/07 at 8:26 AM.

My comrades are my weapons, and I am their shield.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Public Discussion » Public Discussion

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So Druid and Paladin tanking... Athinira Public Discussion 254 02/22/07 1:00 PM
TBC Tanking Movies - Druid Tanking by Athinira Athinira Public Discussion 139 02/05/07 11:14 AM
Paladin and Druid tanking: Maximizing aggro crimsonsentinel Public Discussion 46 11/23/06 5:25 PM
Feral Druid Discussion Runnybabbit Public Discussion 362 08/15/06 1:49 PM
Balance Druid Discussion Mythological Public Discussion 10 05/12/06 6:41 PM