Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Urban Rivals
Forums
New Posts


Go Back   Elitist Jerks > Public Discussion > Public Discussion
Elitist Jerks Login

gamerDNA Login

Welcome to Elitist Jerks
We're testing some new features on the site regarding OpenID registration and coordination with gamerDNA. If you experience any issues with registering an account, please take the time to fill out a report and send it to this e-mail address. We would appreciate any assistance you could provide in making sure everything is functioning as intended. Thanks!

If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ and the forum rules. Users must register to post and new registrations are subject to a one day "mute" period to get acquainted with the community.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06/20/07, 6:54 AM   #1
dukes
of the HMS Failboat
 
dukes's Avatar
 
Tauren Druid
 
Al'Akir (EU)
PvP versus PvE Gear - What's going on?

Forgive me if this seems a rehash of other topics - there's a lot of discussion on this issue in other places (which is ultimately close to derailing threads) but it seemed to need a single place to consolidate the discussion between people on the issue and see whats going on.


The Major Issue
So TBC comes out, and Blizzard are lauding over their nice new system whereby people who PvP get PvP gear that is good for that, and marginally useful in PvE until you get mid-way into raiding. Gear earnt in PvE has no resillience and less stamina, and so is perfectly suited to PvE, and doesn't give the advantage it once did pre-TBC over those who PvPed but can still be used for PvP.

Now we come to 2.1.2 - Season 2 is out, and it seems they made some changes to raid instance gearing. This is all well and good, but blizzard haven't stuck to what they initially started out with. Theres two main problems as I see it:

-- PvP gear encroaching on PvE gear: This is mainly summed up by comparing particular PvP items that have either no equivalent, or an insanely hard to get/high level one. The gladiators spellblade is one of the main offenders, and the gladiators maul (the druid FAP one) is another, but in different ways. The spellblade has equivalents, but they're all end-game, hard to get items that (in some cases) aren't even better. In basic terms, the spellblade is too good for PvE. The maul has no equivalent unless you count Terestians, which is both worse and the only other real raid-quality option, and this is a problem of lack of alternative than the item being too good.

--PvE being required to get specific items for PvP: This is now starting to appear in the form of the rings in SSC. Not only do they take slots for loot that mean upgrading PvE gear will be slower, but they're better than the alternatives given from PvP.

I'm sure Blizzard wants to give some kind of bonus to those who do PvP and PvE to be able to do either, but doing it in this way seems to be going backwards to me.

Possible Solutions
I only really have two possible solutions that I can think of for this.

One is to standardise a new type of damage stat. Make it so theres spell damage and AP stats that purely work on a PvP basis.

An example of this could be the Gladiators Blade - main hand sword, 2.6 speed, practically identical to the current version. However change it so its now 85 DPS base, and give it ~400 Anti-Player AP. This means it stays at around ~95 DPS in a PvP environment, but isn't anywhere near as competitive in a PvE environment.

The other solution means stacking stamina and resillience in a big way on PvP gear, but the problem with that is that then it eats up item budget in a big way too, and that means theres less DPS available for PvP, causing a problem with people using a mix of PvE and PvP gear for maximum effectiveness.


Any thoughts on this problem?
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 7:03 AM   #2
Vanadi
Piston Honda
 
Vanadi's Avatar
 
Undead Rogue
 
Al'Akir (EU)
The weapons will always be outdone by a weapon of the same itemlevel that has stats allocated for pve purposes only. The weapons loose alot of stat value due to resilience being on them. And the only items that might be worth taking for a pve purpose are the weapons. Most classes can't do pve in their gladiator armor sets.

Last edited by Vanadi : 06/21/07 at 7:50 AM.
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 7:10 AM   #3
Schneeb
Don Flamenco
 
Night Elf Warrior
 
<SIN>
Neptulon (EU)
Originally Posted by Vanadi View Post
Besides the weapons, that will be outdone by equal and even a bit lower itemlevel pure pve tailored weapons the difference in pve and pvp gear is massive.
Thats the problem though PvE items of a similar level are only just better, take the the 1h arena weapon with spellhit.

Spellhit is primarily to help spells hitting, in PvE it helps spells land on things that are higher level than yourself. The PvP version of this is spell penetration, penetration is completely broken in PvE yet it still apears on PvE items and one of the most useful stats (spellhit) is on a PvP item.

This spellhit is not just a token amount but a large proportion of that items budget which doesnt correlate to its importance in its intended use at all (PvP).

If PvE armor didnt have so much wasted budget on penetration that does nothing on mobs higher than lvl 70 and was replaced by spellhit, a PvE orientated caster could cap their hit and a weapon with hit suddenly becomes a whole load less valuable.

Last edited by Schneeb : 06/20/07 at 7:26 AM.
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 7:16 AM   #4
Nekali
Joe Glass
 
Blood Elf Death Knight
 
Terrordar (EU)
How would you feel if your PVE Weapons had 85 DPS and a anti-PVE stat which increases AP against non-pvp targets bei ~400?

As this only really concerns weapons I have no issue with some great pve gear coming from pvp. I really enjoy if there are several ways to progress your character. I also liked the way the heroic badges worked and they too provide some great gear which is not from raiding.

Some PVE gear is really usefull in pvp, too. "Spyglass of the Hidden Fleet" could have come straight from a pvp vendor. And it doesn't really matter if there is no resilence on your "Talon of Azshara" it is still a superior hemorrhage sword to the arena ones.

The only complaint I have, is the timing when these things are made available. On our realm no one has killed Vashj yet, so the pve aequivalents are not even available yet. But in the end the new weapons will only help us kill her faster =)

Last edited by Nekali : 06/21/07 at 8:00 AM.
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 7:19 AM   #5
vorda
Bald Bull
 
vorda's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Jaedenar (EU)
Ah well, while I'm still of the opinion that the arena weapons should be lower tuned, since they easily outgear Kael'thas level loot, what they did this patch made it alot worse though.

What were they thinking when they added *pure* PvP rings to SSC bosses, occupying a PvE slot. These rings should have been on the honor vendors, simple as that.
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 7:24 AM   #6
Vanadi
Piston Honda
 
Vanadi's Avatar
 
Undead Rogue
 
Al'Akir (EU)
Originally Posted by Schneeb View Post
If PvE armor didnt have so much wasted budget on penetration that does nothing on mobs higher than lvl 70 and was replaced by spellhit, a PvE orientated caster could cap their hit and a weapon with hit suddenly becomes a whole load less valuable.
On the other side of the story, due to the piss poor itemization on the rogue gladiator set I am forced to use pve gear in my non gladiator slots to make up for the loss in stats. So theres always gonna be items from pvp/pve that work better in a different situation. I dont mind it too much. Yes putting spellhit on the gladiators spellblade seems awkward, but just as the lack of +hit on the rogue set maybe mages have the same issues with there spells being resisted madly in pvp. And spell penetration is not a pvp stat, because lets be honest, how many people run with resistance gear in pvp?
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 7:27 AM   #7
Schneeb
Don Flamenco
 
Night Elf Warrior
 
<SIN>
Neptulon (EU)
Any team with a paladin will probably have 70 resistance to your biggest burst damage caster.
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 7:29 AM   #8
Weigraf
Von Kaiser
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Grim Batol (EU)
Originally Posted by Schneeb View Post
This spellhit is not just a token amount but a large proportion of that items budget which doesnt correlate to its importance in its intended use at all (PvP).
Spell hit might not be as useful in pvp as it is in pve, but the claim that spell hit is wasted on the weapon is wrong. The chance of hitting an equal level player in PvP is 96% meaning you want enough hit ratnig to get 99% hit chance, and as it is the weapons are the only PvP items with spell hit on them which makes it quite useful.
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 7:44 AM   #9
Zedd
Piston Honda
 
Zedd's Avatar
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Nordrassil (EU)
A change I would suggest is this (sorry for the long "spam-like" post"

From:
To:
Merciless Gladiator's Spellblade
Binds when picked up Main Hand Dagger
18 - 113 Damage Speed 1.60
(41.2 damage per second)
+27 Stamina
+18 Intellect
Durability 75 / 75
Requires Level 70
Equip: Improves spell hit rating by 15.
Equip: Improves your resilience rating by 18.
Equip: Increases damage and healing done by magical spells and effects by up to 150.
Equip: Increases damage to players by magical spells and effects by up to 75
from:
to
Merciless Gladiator's Slicer
Binds when picked up One-Hand Sword
165 - 308 Damage Speed 2.70
(87.6 damage per second)
+27 Stamina
Durability 105 / 105
Requires Level 70
Equip: Improves hit rating against players by 10.
Equip: Improves critical strike rating by 19.
Equip: Improves your resilience rating by 12.
Equip: Increases attack against players by 250
Edit for shortening
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 7:49 AM   #10
Maledict
Bald Bull
 
Maledict's Avatar
 
Undead Mage
 
Bloodhoof (EU)
Originally Posted by Weigraf View Post
Spell hit might not be as useful in pvp as it is in pve, but the claim that spell hit is wasted on the weapon is wrong. The chance of hitting an equal level player in PvP is 96% meaning you want enough hit ratnig to get 99% hit chance, and as it is the weapons are the only PvP items with spell hit on them which makes it quite useful.
Getting 3% to hit as a caster is quite literally trivial. Our single head enchant alone gives +1.5% to hit, and most dps casters have some form of + to hit talent anyway. (For example, no mage ever needs a single point of + to hit gear in PvP).
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 7:55 AM   #11
Tanoh
Piston Honda
 
Tanoh's Avatar
 
Undead Mage
 
Earthen Ring (EU)
Nifty idea, but I doubt it'll happen. For one thing the items would be totally useless in anything apart from pvp which I don't think Blizzard wants. Imagine getting jumped by a mob on your way to the arena, you'd be fighting litterarly unarmed.

Also why split the spell damage portion into two and not the AP?
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 7:57 AM   #12
Zedd
Piston Honda
 
Zedd's Avatar
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Nordrassil (EU)
Originally Posted by Tanoh View Post
Nifty idea, but I doubt it'll happen. For one thing the items would be totally useless in anything apart from pvp which I don't think Blizzard wants. Imagine getting jumped by a mob on your way to the arena, you'd be fighting litterarly unarmed.

Also why split the spell damage portion into two and not the AP?
I dont know how much AP matches the weapon damage for melee, so i took weapon damage from spiteblade and added a ammount of AP that seemed right
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 8:03 AM   #13
Weigraf
Von Kaiser
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Grim Batol (EU)
Originally Posted by Maledict View Post
Getting 3% to hit as a caster is quite literally trivial. Our single head enchant alone gives +1.5% to hit, and most dps casters have some form of + to hit talent anyway. (For example, no mage ever needs a single point of + to hit gear in PvP).
I know it's trivial to get the hit rating but it has to come from somewhere and you'll have 0 spell hit if you're in full pvp gear. And feel free to correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the mage +hit talent only affect frost and fire spells whereas counterspell, arguably the most important spell to always hit, is arcane?
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 8:10 AM   #14
Miaxi
Don Flamenco
 
Miaxi's Avatar
 
Troll Shaman
 
Al'Akir (EU)
The problem is not that the spellblade is too good, the problem is that there is only one single dagger in the loot tables of Karazhan+SSC+TK and one other dagger in the Black Temple. All shadow priests, elemental shamans, moonkin druids, warlocks and mages are after that one single piece. Having an alternative way of getting a weapon is not bad when you are looking towards 3-4 months of waiting and drama till you get a lucky drop.

Weapons drops from PvE are just way too rare to keep up with the overall progression. Without blacksmithing and arenas, most people would be using weapons of far lower quality than their armor, and you really can't claim this would be a new thing; people grinded to high warlord back when it took months of dedicated play just to have a proper set of weapons. PvE weapon drops need to be tokenized, so there are a couple guaranteed weapon drops every week instead of a bunch of void crystals while casters are still going around with exalted Thrallmar swords.

Last edited by Miaxi : 06/20/07 at 8:21 AM.
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 8:12 AM   #15
dukes
of the HMS Failboat
 
dukes's Avatar
 
Tauren Druid
 
Al'Akir (EU)
250 AP is the equivalent of only (250/(14*2.7)) = 6.6 DPS, right? Seems a bit low with only 87 dps on the weapon.

Maybe instead of making them insignificant for PvE, a reduction to a baseline of 90DPS (still better than entry-level raid items making them useful for intial encounters/in line with karazhan but not for further progression) or ~180 spell damage, and then factor up the AP/damage against players from that. This would hardly make them "useless" for non-PvP things, but would certainly give them an edge in PvP and make them equal to weapons from entry-level BT/Hyjal which are starting to filter through to raiders in PvP situations, which is where they should be imo.

Theres 2 mage +hit talents, one for frost/fire (3 points, 3%), and one arcane only (5 points, 10%)
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 8:12 AM   #16
Crowl
Bald Bull
 
Night Elf Warrior
 
Runetotem (EU)
Originally Posted by Tanoh View Post
Nifty idea, but I doubt it'll happen. For one thing the items would be totally useless in anything apart from pvp which I don't think Blizzard wants. Imagine getting jumped by a mob on your way to the arena, you'd be fighting litterarly unarmed.
More than a bit of hyperbole there, all he has done is reduce the better than t5-level weapons from pvp down to a t4-level when not used in pvp, its not like he has actually crippled them.

It doesn't seem unreasonable that the best items for pve at an equivalent level should come from pve not pvp and vice versa.
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 8:22 AM   #17
Maledict
Bald Bull
 
Maledict's Avatar
 
Undead Mage
 
Bloodhoof (EU)
And Arcane has a +10% to hit talent at rank 1 in the arcane tree, which again literally every mage takes.

The only class which doesn't have the + to hit needed for PvP purposes are destruction or demonology specced warlocks. (Afliction has a 10% to hit talent as well). *Every* other caster class in the game will already be at the hit cap rating for PvP opponents.
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 9:09 AM   #18
f1reburn
Piston Honda
 
Night Elf Death Knight
 
<IFA>
Frostmane (EU)
Consider the possibility that new raid content might be released before the arena season 2 ends. That new raid content might bring us pve weapons superior to the current arena weapons.
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 9:12 AM   #19
tunah
Von Kaiser
 
Gnome Mage
 
Eldre'Thalas
I agree that this is a problem. I'm in a small guild that cleared kara a month or so ago and is just starting to look at joint gruul runs with other guilds. I play 10 arena games a week on each of my characters, sometimes for fun, often because I'm obligated to if I care about character progression. My teams probably average 1500 rating, I don't gear for it or do any other preparation, and it takes very little time or effort.

Being months behind, still enjoying kara/heroics/alts, any weapon I get from PVE is just a placeholder until I get the PVP one. After killing prince for a couple of months, we haven't seen a Light's Justice drop. If we're lucky, our healing priest will have one in a couple of weeks. Meanwhile, my paladin alt will have something better.

Some of the armor is well separated - the cloth pieces look like dungeon blues with +40sta, +100armor, +30resil.
Druid gear on the other hand - 4 out of 5 pieces of the feral set are better for tanking than anything I can attain through PVE. 2 out of 5 pieces of the *same set* are better for DPS than anything available.

I guess my problem is that such powerful items are available at all to casual/non PVPers like myself, which throws balance out the window.
Historically, your options for progression (at least in PVE) were:
Invest little time, little skill -> average blues
Invest a lot of time, little skill -> average epics (rep/easy raids)
Invest little time, more skill -> average epics (easy raids)
Invest a lot of time, more skill -> excellent epics (top tier raids)
but now all of a sudden I can pick up top tier epics without any level of skill and only a moderate time investment.

I don't have a problem with a 2300-rated PVP-er having an awesome weapon for raids, it's the 1450-rated mage with a spellblade (hi!) who's getting an unfair advantage.
If I were king, there would have been a season 0 blue set, at ~1900 rating it'd drop in price and the S1 set would be available.
When S2 came out, the S1 threshold would have dropped to 1700, and S2 + discounted S1 would be available at 2100 rating.
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 9:24 AM   #20
Plea
Don Flamenco
 
Human Priest
 
Chromaggus (EU)
How exactly is this a problem? They just added some rings. Is there anything else Ive been missing? Pvp items are still better in pvp, and pve items better in pve. There will of course be exceptions, all of this are in the same game after all; you do need to have them interacting with each other.
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 9:33 AM   #21
Vhad
Don Flamenco
 
Night Elf Warrior
 
Silvermoon (EU)
Originally Posted by Plea View Post
How exactly is this a problem? They just added some rings. Is there anything else Ive been missing? Pvp items are still better in pvp, and pve items better in pve. There will of course be exceptions, all of this are in the same game after all; you do need to have them interacting with each other.
It's a problem that atleast 3 bosses had their loot tables not only expanded to reduce chance of your desired item to drop, but filled with utter stupid resillience rings when the honor vendors had already gotten new PvP specific rings. Get the PvP gear out of PvE, just as PvE items need to get out of PvP.

What!?
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 9:53 AM   #22
Miaxi
Don Flamenco
 
Miaxi's Avatar
 
Troll Shaman
 
Al'Akir (EU)
Originally Posted by f1reburn View Post
Consider the possibility that new raid content might be released before the arena season 2 ends. That new raid content might bring us pve weapons superior to the current arena weapons.
Hyjal/BT weapons are already superior. The arena items are on par of tier 5 content.
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 10:00 AM   #23
MalkuthSB
Glass Joe
 
Undead Priest
 
Spinebreaker (EU)
My initial reaction was that PVP gear was for PVP and PVE for PVE.

But, now I'm starting to think that it might not be all that bad for you to have done some PVP AND some PVE to have the very best gear on your character. Guys with the best gear available will have proven themselves in PVE and PVP.

Only flaw in this is that getting gear in PVP doensnt actually prove you are any good at it, but thats a whole different question.
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 10:02 AM   #24
Plea
Don Flamenco
 
Human Priest
 
Chromaggus (EU)
Originally Posted by Vhad View Post
It's a problem that atleast 3 bosses had their loot tables not only expanded to reduce chance of your desired item to drop, but filled with utter stupid resillience rings when the honor vendors had already gotten new PvP specific rings. Get the PvP gear out of PvE, just as PvE items need to get out of PvP.
t5 is old content. They probably didnt expect players would care about a change in the new entry-level raid zones. Frankly, most dont; new arena sets are better for pve than t5, at least for some of us
 
User is offline.
Old 06/20/07, 10:24 AM   #25
Kardinalen
Von Kaiser
 
Bolg
Troll Priest
 
No WoW Account
Compared to the old "raid or die" mentality Blizzard had for PvP this system rocks. Yes, your Black Temple/Hyjal loot won't feel "special" but really is this so wrong for those of you who like PvE? You get a really easy way to upgrade your weapons and dish out even higher DPS on encounters instead of waiting for the random loot system to give you what you want. In maybe a year of killing Chromaggus and Nefarian my guild looted 2 Chromatically Tempered Swords and 2 Ashkandis. Add to that maybe 10 months of killing Fankriss for 1 or 2 Ancient Qiraji Rippers. How is that any better?
 
User is offline.
Closed Thread

Go Back   Elitist Jerks > Public Discussion > Public Discussion

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
oRA2 versus CTRaid Igni User Interface and AddOns 15 04/06/07 7:15 PM
Hunter question about Agi versus Int on weapon Taznavarah The Dung Heap 4 12/29/06 12:02 PM
PvP gear = PvE gear; access to PvP gear will be limited by time Igni Public Discussion 74 09/12/06 2:54 PM
Quickie - Medallion versus Pendant grimjack Public Discussion 6 09/07/06 1:02 PM