Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Public Discussion

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07/25/07, 5:58 PM   #301
snape
Great Tiger
 
snape's Avatar
 
Human Mage
 
Destromath
Originally Posted by Karakas View Post
Then you run into the dilemma of 3-piece Trans / 5-piece Earthfury all over again.

From my experience set bonuses fall into one of two categories:

1) A pure "numbers increase", for example many of the T6 benefits offer something which could eventually be overcome by better gear. These are perhaps the safest of all set bonuses since they are useful, but can be easily replaced.

2) A "unique" ability, usually something that only talents can offer (3-piece Trans, 5-piece Nightslayer), but can also encompass other abilities that may be outside the realm of talents. These are typically either really bad, or amazingly good (on the level of being overpowered).

Trying to link character progression to set bonuses creates the potential issue of never being able to let go of "x-piece y set bonus", which could limit future gear upgrades and itemization.
8-piece Netherwind anyone? I had to scream till I was blue in the face at the Mages I headed at the end of AQ - they were all so up in arms about breaking their 8/8 NW, when it's actually only a very small increase in DPS (4% for Frost, 5% for Fire). They were all just blinded by the "OMG, this is so cool" rather than, "Hey, Enigma has so much better +dmg and other stats, that it's actually better in the long run".

That's why I believe 8/8 NW was a stroke of genius in Mage gear. It just dazzled whoever got it to the point of irrationality.

Offline
Old 07/25/07, 5:58 PM   #302
Digo
Great Tiger
 
Digo's Avatar
 
Human Death Knight
 
Hyjal
Originally Posted by Kaubel View Post
Something like this is what Digo is asking for.
Yep. The trait system is like an ever-increasing talent tree system, you just need to pick which talents you want to use at any given time. I suspect that WAR is doing something similar with their PVP progression to prevent power imbalance. Even if I'm a veteran that has over 100 talents to choose from, I can only load up 10 at any given time.

Offline
Old 07/25/07, 5:58 PM   #303
Kalman
Super Macho Man
 
Kalman's Avatar
 
<>
Orc Shaman
 
No WoW Account
LOTRO's system seems pretty good - character progression determines the number of slots you have, but what you can put in those slots can be advanced. There's infinite scope for expansion of the breadth of character power, without succumbing to rampant inflation of amount of character power.

Ironically, there's a perfectly good system in game for this - talents. Imagine if AA points could be spent to unlock new talents. Your total number of talent points (and therefore, roughly, power) stays the same, but you gain different abilities/flexibilities.

Of course balancing it into the talent system would be a bitch.

Melador> Incidentally, these last few pages are why people hate lawyers.
Viator> I really don't want to go all Kalman here.
Bury> Just imagine what the world would be like if you used your powers for good.

Clearly law school has done wonders for me.

United States Offline
Old 07/25/07, 6:00 PM   #304
 Navaash
enjoys game, likely in minority
 
Navaash's Avatar
 
Undead Mage
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by snape View Post
Similarly, other games, D&D Computer games primarily, gave you the option to pick whatever stat you wanted to level up as you leveled. Problem is, those changes were permament, but I'm sure they wouldn't be if something like that was implemented here.
I'm pretty sure this was actually the case in early alpha but it was removed because Blizzard didn't want to have to deal with the distressed masses who would learn that their plan of making Gandalf the Sword-Swinging Battle Mage wasn't going to end well.

Japan Offline
Old 07/25/07, 6:12 PM   #305
 Viator
Not actually William Falkingham
 
Viator's Avatar
 
Viator
Troll Mage
 
No WoW Account
Originally Posted by Tyrian View Post

Ive heard alot of people mention more dynamic/involving/meaningful pvp as one - so could we quite comfortable say the second expansion is going to have some big pvp changes?
I'm not comfortable saying that at all.

If you watch the arc of WoW's development it becomes clear that WoW wants things to be as even as possible. With a true, free for all pvp game with expanding borders, meaningful buffs and progression, player owned cities and server wide wars balance goes out the window due to the varying sizes of the warring factions. It's something I just don't see WoW doing after funneling what pvp they do have into tightly controlled environments.

I see them doing more of the same which is providing tight pve with a pvp sideshow because it's GOOD and it makes them money.

Or as the exchange went with some of our guys who went to E3 after hanging out with some Blizz guys for awhile (all in jest):

Guy1: Yeah, when you guys want a MAN'S game look us up
Guy2: Dude, I'm sure they're wiping the sweat from their brows with hundred dollar bills at the thought of it.

Mages have a set time that they want you to ask for food, and that time is pull #4 of the night. You may notice them putting a little snack table down before the raid, that's them cooking the food for you to demand on pull 4. --Nork

United States Offline
Old 07/26/07, 1:31 AM   #306
Maynard
Don Flamenco
 
Maynard's Avatar
 
Tauren Druid
 
Frostmourne
I've often considered that perhaps defeating a major boss could give abilities to the raid, or even just particularly crucual members of the raid, that would make that boss or future bosses somewhat easier in future. Current raid design already works vaguely on these principles - your tank learns to berserker rage through fear so that he can apply this principle to future dragons that have more complex mechanics. On a very simple level, early bosses help DPS classes establish their basic rotations so that meeting enrage timers on later bosses is second nature.

Imagine, for instance, if an encounter required hunters to utilise misdirection; upon completing the encounter the hunters gain an a permanent buff to misdirection that increases the range of attacks while affected by misdirection by 10 yards; this additional range could allow the hunter to out-range boss abilities and also demand an additional skill of the hunter in range measurement.

In PvP, evolving and gaining abilities can ensure that reaching higher ratings means you're presented with a more complex game.

Once again it's difficult to balance, but with new and fresh MMOs coming out, it's up to Blizzard to either keep up with the innovation or become a purely raid-orienated MMO.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 3:10 AM   #307
Metrosexuelf
Don Flamenco
 
Metrosexuelf's Avatar
 
Orc Hunter
 
Uldum
WoW will always be PvE centric. Arena has gotten them what they wanted out of PvP: something they can advertise and showcase at world-wide video game competitions like they did (and still do) with Battle.net games.

Don't get me wrong, I would love to see some dynamic world PvP but it will never happen.

Last edited by Metrosexuelf : 07/26/07 at 1:29 PM.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 6:53 AM   #308
_Retribute_
Piston Honda
 
_Retribute_'s Avatar
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Mal'Ganis
This is what i don't get about blizzards strategy. You pursue better and better content, once you reach that end content you want to show off your gear in pvp. But when blizzard added in completely separate gear for pvp it made the pursuit of gear almost futile for the people wanting to pvp in their hard earned BT gear. I love seeing the new raid content and i do it to learn encounters from trial and error, but when that hard work pays off with harder work and once you reach that top content you feel horribly burnt out and not wanting to play anymore. Its not like you cant pvp with some of that pve gear, some classes can. Its just the different itemization makes it very difficult. At times i really miss the old pre-tbc WoW.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 9:55 AM   #309
Bellise
High Priestess of Elune
 
Bellise's Avatar
 
Draenei Priest
 
Sylvanas (EU)
Originally Posted by _Retribute_ View Post
This is what i don't get about blizzards strategy. You pursue better and better content, once you reach that end content you want to show off your gear in pvp. But when blizzard added in completely separate gear for pvp it made the pursuit of gear almost futile for the people wanting to pvp in their hard earned BT gear. I love seeing the new raid content and i do it to learn encounters from trial and error, but when that hard work pays off with harder work and once you reach that top content you feel horribly burnt out and not wanting to play anymore. Its not like you cant pvp with some of that pve gear, some classes can. Its just the different itemization makes it very difficult. At times i really miss the old pre-tbc WoW.
On the contrary I actually like that they made PvE and PvP in separate ways. Getting stronger items from PvPing that makes you stronger in PvP makes absolute sense to me.

Who we are is but a stepping stone to what we can become.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 10:47 AM   #310
Nezralix
Bald Bull
 
Orc Warrior
 
Burning Blade
Originally Posted by Bellis123 View Post
On the contrary I actually like that they made PvE and PvP in separate ways. Getting stronger items from PvPing that makes you stronger in PvP makes absolute sense to me.
It makes absolute sense to everyone; it's the "stronger items in PvE that don't make you stronger in PvP" part that people don't get.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 10:59 AM   #311
songster
Chief Passenger
 
Gnome Rogue
 
Earthen Ring (EU)
Originally Posted by Nezralix View Post
It makes absolute sense to everyone; it's the "stronger items in PvE that don't make you stronger in PvP" part that people don't get.
Um, surely this is a large patch of jam on the ground where a horse used to be?

PvE items do make you stronger in PvP, just not as strong as the items earned through dedicated PvP. And vice versa, PvP items do make you stronger in PvE, just not as much as the items earned through dedicated PvE.

Just about the only wild card is the arena weapons, since it's pretty hard to make a weapon that's differentially useful in PvE and PvP. But then, the same applies to weapons obtained through PvE.

For what it's worth, I for one don't think that items earned through excellence in one part of the game should necessarily render you excellent in another area, and think Blizzard finally has a reasonable system for differentiating the two. It's unfortunate that the balance isn't quite even across different specs, though.

Great Britain Offline
Old 07/26/07, 12:35 PM   #312
Grub
Banned
 
Tauren Druid
 
Spinebreaker
Warcry's Zul'aman preview is here:
World of Warcraft WarCry : News : WoW: A Look At The Next Update From E3

I found this quote particularly interesting:

We were also told about a philosophical change at Blizzard, namely logical loot. Previously, the loot tables were somewhat random. They're not going back and fixing years of content, but now, players can expect creatures to drop things that one would expect. If that bad guy is holding a big, shiny axe, then odds are his loot is a big shiny axe. This is a general goal and a monumental exercise in inter-departmental organization (they need to make sure the artists and loot guys play nice with each other), but one they seem rather committed to. It's a small touch, but it sure beats wolves coughing up fishing poles!

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 12:40 PM   #313
Emily
Piston Honda
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Doomhammer (EU)
My opinion:

WoW ain't broke, it's not gonna get "fixed".

Blizz will keep serving up more of the same; primarily PvE-focused gameplay, with new places, new weapon graphics and bigger numbers.

There's not going to be any massive design alterations to a game that's so immensely popular across such a broad spectrum of players. Yes, WoW will lose subscribers to games that cater to a specific part of the market (and developers will make games designed to appeal to smaller demographics rather than try and take WoW on at its own game), but these are drops in the ocean.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 1:29 PM   #314
Shadout
Don Flamenco
 
Undead Mage
 
Twisting Nether (EU)
I dont hope they are going too far with "Logical loot" (tm...).
To look at a different, but still somehwat related genre, the action-rpgs's such a system can really be terrible. While loot in WoW obviously is far less random than it was in Diablo2, and should be that way, in the end it takes away the fun in rare random drops, if the system is close to What-you-see-is-what-you-get as a game like Titan Quest use (and because they knew it sucked they just had a million chests instead with random loot).

Fun > Realism. I surely dont like a game less because a wolf can drop more than meat, eyes and whatever.

Adding a few items the bosses are using to the loot is fine ofc, but uhm, havent they always been quite good at doing that.

About Blizzcon, Ive believed for a long time Blizz would go for something similar to the current "Intel Strategy", with "Revolution" Year X, Evolution next year, then a new revolution etc. Instead of the old strategy with revolutions only (whether big or small). They changed strategy to throw out upgrades more often. Since they hardly works faster than before, it obviously means the upgrades you get each year is less than before. Faster expansions is ofc somethig Blizz has expressed interest in too.

With such a strategy Blizz would have an expansion 1 year with lvl upgrades and lots of new content, like BC. Then next year no new lvls (as this really add a need for lots of content related to it + insane amounts of rebalancing), but instead just more end game zones, more instances, raids, features etc.)


Not that I really have any idea ofc For another week at least

Last edited by Shadout : 07/26/07 at 1:44 PM.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 1:36 PM   #315
Dyalad
Glass Joe
 
Dyalad's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Kargath
Originally Posted by Emily View Post
My opinion:

WoW ain't broke, it's not gonna get "fixed".

Blizz will keep serving up more of the same; primarily PvE-focused gameplay, with new places, new weapon graphics and bigger numbers.
I agree with you. Why break a winning concept? As much as people rant, WoW has something that pleases most of its customers, because there wouldn't be so much people playing it.

Think about Warcraft and Starcraft. From the 1st to the last, the core of it remained unchanged, and that's what made Blizzard RTS so popular. I think that if they try to revolutionize WoW, they're going to lose, because most people are reluctant to changes, and revamping the current mechanics would definitly end up in a disaster; Just look at the rather minor changes they do to classes and how much people end up complaining...

I hope they will announce more content for Azeroth, and will complete the unfinished sections there are (Uldum, Hyjal, Grim Batol, etc). I'm really eager to see Zul Aman.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 1:37 PM   #316
Metrosexuelf
Don Flamenco
 
Metrosexuelf's Avatar
 
Orc Hunter
 
Uldum
Originally Posted by _Retribute_ View Post
This is what i don't get about blizzards strategy. You pursue better and better content, once you reach that end content you want to show off your gear in pvp. But when blizzard added in completely separate gear for pvp it made the pursuit of gear almost futile for the people wanting to pvp in their hard earned BT gear. I love seeing the new raid content and i do it to learn encounters from trial and error, but when that hard work pays off with harder work and once you reach that top content you feel horribly burnt out and not wanting to play anymore. Its not like you cant pvp with some of that pve gear, some classes can. Its just the different itemization makes it very difficult. At times i really miss the old pre-tbc WoW.
Everyone is different but I never PvE'd for the purpose of gearing up to dominate people in PvP. Sure it's a nice side-effect but most people PvE for the enjoyment and challenge of PvE itself. I don't find it incongrous in the least that being good in PvE doesn't necessarily give you a leg up on PvP.

Also, as Emily said: It's not broken so they won't fix it. Nine million subscribers now (yes I know it's not nine million unique people but that's irrelevant to Blizzard that is still hauling in 1.5 billion a year gross income)? No reason to alter fundamental aspects of the game unless Warhammer starts siphoning off accounts in a year or so.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 2:27 PM   #317
Laes
Glass Joe
 
Night Elf Priest
 
Elune
Originally Posted by Digo View Post
Yep. The trait system is like an ever-increasing talent tree system, you just need to pick which talents you want to use at any given time. I suspect that WAR is doing something similar with their PVP progression to prevent power imbalance. Even if I'm a veteran that has over 100 talents to choose from, I can only load up 10 at any given time.
Yes, but the quests to achieve those traits in LotRO are the most mind-numbing grindfest. Slug-killer title for killing 180 slugs. Trait boost (e.g. wow talent) from farming an additional 300ish for a small benefit. It's a reputation grind without the reputation. A Deed system would be great, but not the way LotRO has implemented it.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 2:43 PM   #318
Draegan
Von Kaiser
 
Orc Death Knight
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by Laes View Post
Yes, but the quests to achieve those traits in LotRO are the most mind-numbing grindfest. Slug-killer title for killing 180 slugs. Trait boost (e.g. wow talent) from farming an additional 300ish for a small benefit. It's a reputation grind without the reputation. A Deed system would be great, but not the way LotRO has implemented it.
Truth. When the game was capped before the full release I spent needless hours grinding out traits, for lack of anything better to do. It was awful. Unfortunately it was wasted time since the game turned out to suck at the higher end.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 3:08 PM   #319
Darlal
Piston Honda
 
Night Elf Rogue
 
Doomhammer
I always felt like the generic profession template was underused. Fishing, cooking, and first aid are all well and good, but adding some really interesting/challenging professions with nice side effects would rock. For instance: an explorer profession based on either finding/getting to hard-to-reach places or even just % of map discovered that gives you a movement speed increase while out of combat, a treasure-hunting profession based on some interesting solo quests that boosts your chance to get green (maybe even blue/purple) items from mobs. These types of things really enrich game play without doing anything to end-game raiding/pvp. Nonetheless, they give fun things to work on while not raiding as well as ways to power up your character in subtle ways.

Furthermore, I would support a set of quests that teach specific skills and things that are currently racial abilities as rewards. The whole racial-ability framework is really silly in pve and downright destructive in pvp. Give each player 3 slots, 1 for on-use, 1 for stat boost, and 1 for passive, or use some form of point system ala talent trees. There is no reason not to have a class-specific set of kiting based quests that teaches you escape artist, a spell-interruption chain that gives you wotf, an enemy ability avoidance chain resulting in +15% stamina. The fact is that in the top guilds, players re-rolled their character to have the optimal races for roles in which it matters. Just give everyone their current racials for free, and let them quest for the rest if they want to.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 3:45 PM   #320
Lazare
Piston Honda
 
Human Priest
 
Lightbringer
What I'd like to see is a revamp/extension of the relic system. Unsure on the terminology; call them artifacts perhaps.

Give every player oh...3 "artifact" slots, and add a large number of artifacts. A token system with a vendor might be ideal. Artifacts act a lot like existing relics - they give moderate, unique, but highly specialized boosts to specific skills, and/or unique abilities (much like set bonuses). This lets people customize their character to fit their playstyle or the encounter. The bonuses wouldn't be extremely powerful, but they would be unique and interesting, much like the T3 set bonuses, for example. (Much weaker than trinkets, and never with activateable abilities.)

The benefit to the system is that it would give you "unique" abilities (and not just "oh yay, another 2 spirit"), but that it wouldn't interfere with normal gear progression (hence avoiding the 3 piece trans problem).

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 4:04 PM   #321
Rasputin
King Hippo
 
Jayhanez
Blood Elf Paladin
 
No WoW Account
Originally Posted by Lazare View Post
What I'd like to see is a revamp/extension of the relic system. Unsure on the terminology; call them artifacts perhaps.

Give every player oh...3 "artifact" slots, and add a large number of artifacts. A token system with a vendor might be ideal. Artifacts act a lot like existing relics - they give moderate, unique, but highly specialized boosts to specific skills, and/or unique abilities (much like set bonuses). This lets people customize their character to fit their playstyle or the encounter. The bonuses wouldn't be extremely powerful, but they would be unique and interesting, much like the T3 set bonuses, for example. (Much weaker than trinkets, and never with activateable abilities.)

The benefit to the system is that it would give you "unique" abilities (and not just "oh yay, another 2 spirit"), but that it wouldn't interfere with normal gear progression (hence avoiding the 3 piece trans problem).
I really like this idea. I truly enjoy the Demonology aspect of the Warlock class and would love to use it more in PvE. However, the barriers to doing so involve 3 slots of gear which I am then all but forbidden from upgrading if I want to continue my adventures in Demonology(2-piece Tier 5 bonus and the Void Star Talisman). If I could equip an item to allow my damage to heal my pet, another to give him additional resistance, and say a third to improve my felguard's AP scaling from my spell damage, I would be happier than a naked gnome. A system like this could allow a great deal of customization to a character while maintaining viability in the world of min-max raiding.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 4:09 PM   #322
Linnet
Piston Honda
 
Undead Warrior
 
Argent Dawn (EU)
What I would really like to see is some kind of solution to the whole 'we'll let you get 20 slot bags but most of them will be filled up with different outfits that you need for different encounters'. I get that managing your bag space as a resource makes people think about their farming but it's just not fun to have to lug that much gear around regularly.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 4:19 PM   #323
Rasputin
King Hippo
 
Jayhanez
Blood Elf Paladin
 
No WoW Account
A single gear-swap set a la Diablo 2 would be an interesting start. It's certainly a lot more gear and the inventory system in the two games is massively different, but paladin memories of having resist sets, a healing set, a ret set, a shockadin set, a pvp healing set, etc make me yearn for some sort of solution. Even on my warlock I wouldn't mind having a "Boss Set" for hitcap and standard max damage on bosses as well as at leadt one other set.


Hmm, for those who didn't play D2, this involves an alternate equipped gear screen that you switch between with a keypress, doubling the amount of items you can carry as equipped items.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 5:21 PM   #324
Lazare
Piston Honda
 
Human Priest
 
Lightbringer
Originally Posted by Rasputin View Post
I really like this idea. I truly enjoy the Demonology aspect of the Warlock class and would love to use it more in PvE. However, the barriers to doing so involve 3 slots of gear which I am then all but forbidden from upgrading if I want to continue my adventures in Demonology(2-piece Tier 5 bonus and the Void Star Talisman). If I could equip an item to allow my damage to heal my pet, another to give him additional resistance, and say a third to improve my felguard's AP scaling from my spell damage, I would be happier than a naked gnome. A system like this could allow a great deal of customization to a character while maintaining viability in the world of min-max raiding.
Good example. Set bonuses and "real" items are not good places to put unique abilities. If they're good and they scale, you'll never take them off (which typically leads to a nerf when Bliz realizes their mistake - see [Lifegiving Gem]). If they're good and they don't scale it creates frustration as people outgrow an item which is key to their build or playstyle (as with your [Void Star Talisman]). And if they're bad (as happens all too often) then you've just got a junk item taking up a valuable slot in a loot table (*cough*[Aegis of Preservation]*cough*).

The key is that it would be nice if characters could further specialize their characters above and beyond what existing talent trees can offer. It would also be very nice if this "extra" specialization could be tweaked in between fights; making the system be based on items seems like an obvious way of doing this. Plus, if you had, say, 10 useful artifacts, and had to pick 3 to use at any given time, it'd provide choices, limit the unbalancing effects, and let min/maxers have some fun.

Random additional point: One thing which bugs me is the random and haphazard way Blizzard does set bonuses. There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason to it, nor any real attempt to balance the power of bonuses across classes or tiers.

Offline
Old 07/26/07, 5:34 PM   #325
Draele
Don Flamenco
 
Human Warlock
 
Thunderhorn
Originally Posted by Dyalad View Post
I agree with you. Why break a winning concept? As much as people rant, WoW has something that pleases most of its customers, because there wouldn't be so much people playing it.
To a point yes, the core of the game is excellent but there's just a lot of roadblocks.

I, for example am a very avid raider, and while we aren't cream of the crop in raid progression (SSC/TK) I consider myself a hardcore raider. That being said I have no way to advance my character outside of raids. I'd love to see ways to really customize/optimize my character on my own time through AAs, hero classes, etc to really create an extraordinarily customized playstyle. I'd like to be able to advance when we're not raiding. I'd like to really focus my character in on certain abilities/talents at the expense of others...I'm an Affliction nut, why can't I focus even more on it?

Unfortunately, none of these things exist . I've gotten to the point of playing other MMOs because I'm so roadblocked in WoW. I'm starting to lose interest just because I can't advance in any form be it raid gear(simply terrible Affliction itemization), further specialization, rep grind(already done the few things that were worthwhile), etc. If it goes on too much longer they may lose a customer, not because it's a bad game(It's a great game!), but because I've been stuck with the same gear/stats/progression for the last 2-3 months.

Offline
Closed Thread

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Public Discussion

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Heroic Five Mans, what you need to know, and what you should expect. Anias Public Discussion 999 06/08/07 1:33 PM
What should we expect in damage from our raid hunters? Emie Public Discussion 160 11/20/06 7:25 AM
Bonescythe set bonuses speculation Kir Public Discussion 5 07/02/06 6:28 PM
I don't expect this to make a difference, but... Windsor Public Discussion 45 11/28/05 6:17 PM