Yes but I want to know how FREQUENTLY she uses Light of Solarian; the bomb is just geddon++, and we already know how to deal with the AM with no one having AR. I want to know if she casts Light of Solarian freqently enough to require raidwide AR.

Datamine numbers don't help, there.

I'd assume it would be just as frequently as before.

That's what the other guy assumed, but I want to know for certain since it might not be true, but I can't convince enough folk to copy to PTR.

I think Motw + trinket would be worth wearing to get partial resists. you lose very little dps swapping a trinket and you get the extra stam.

These changes seems like it will make the fight easier and more of a retard check. It really would be just baron geddon part 2.

Currently, ignite takes no extra damage from vulnerabilities on the mobs (CoE, Misery, Scorch), nor is it affected by damage reducing buffs.
It would make sense that resilience won't effect it either, but let's just watch and see.

Wouldn't that be "double dipping" from the debuff list if the dot portion of ignite did get vulnerability bonuses? The crit that triggered the ignite already benefitted from any vulnerabilities, and ignite is 40% of the spells damage over 4 seconds.

An error was encountered while processing your request
[The topic you're trying to post to has been deleted]

I guess blizzard doesn't want to explain it, too bad

I was just looking at the Armor Sets Page on the official site, and looking at the warrior's set, the helm doesn't have 14 hit rating. Just wondering if this is a bug, or is it getting changed this patch?

Deep Wounds is based off of current weapon damage though, not how much you hit for.

Apologies, double post and I can't seem to find the delete key.

'Light' just takes place of the 'Mark' ability that, in addition to reducing your Arcane Resist, did a raid-wide nuke each time it got applied. The only change is that it will no longer reduce your AR.

Sigh...Another hunter pve nerf, its a shame cause hunters crit since BC are low and we rely more on it then ever before.

Sorry to rewind to the enchants, but can anyone confirm that the threat to gloves enchant has had its materials changed/not changed?

I can find an enchanter to do it... its just the larval acid that has made me decide to hold off.

(edit: non-bumping reply)
Thank ya sir.

Per Wowhead comment (take that for what it's worth):

Anyone seen where the designs for Delicate fire ruby or ridged bladestone are comming from? I hopped on the PTR and checked all the factions I could think of and couldn't find them. Were they just datamined and design location is unknown?

Okay, something is up with the changes in how regeneration works.

They seemed to have botched it when applying it to energy and our 20 energy per 2 seconds is now destroyed when using opening moves.

Here's what is happening:

Imagine the top line as normal energy ticks, and the bottom ones as what's happening in 2.1 and on the PTR. Is anyone else experiencing this or am I just going batty?

This is intentional. Remember the post about prorating the mana gains when your regeneration rate changes, so you don't get good or bad ticks from evocation and innervate depending on when in the heartbeat you cast it? This is the same change applied to energy regen.

I bet if you use adrenaline rush halfway through a heartbeat tick you'll immediately gain 20 energy.

Did you check Cenarian Expedition or Thrallmar? Those are the only reps not listed.

I don't so much mind openers changing, but this could have a horrible side effect. I'll regularly let my energy just hit full and instantly hit a skill when I see it tick. Not so much anymore that I'm Combat Dagger, but it's quite essential as Mutilate to keep Find Weakness uptime as high as possible (and more predictable as Mutilate, since you don't have Combat Potency). Will that be cutting into the energy returns?

Rogues, never got good or bad ticks... Our regeneration was always the same, and was static. All this serves to do is limit how much energy we get, and rather severely limiting our opening sequences.

It's like if a Mage who used evocation suddenly got 1/4 as much mana back form it because they started it at half mana rather than no mana.

It just doesn't make any sense that I'm getting cheated out of 1-19 energy EVERY time I start combat. I don't see that happening when a mage uses evocation (in fact that's what the change was trying to fix).

Doing an opener doesn't change your energy regen rate though. Adrenaline rush getting changed by the new mechanics was expected.

What's described here is more analagous to a caster at full mana getting a reduced regen tick because they were at full mana for the first half of the tick. Actually, I haven't tested, that may be the case in 2.2 as well if the rogue thing is any indication.

If it's not restricted to just openers (and I don't see why it would be), then it's a significant loss of energy over the length of a fight, especially as mutilate where you're timing find weakness.

It's merely standardised it so that you get 1 energy per 0.1 seconds, instead of 20 energy every 2 seconds. It's fixing what could be considered a bug in the current system. Sure, no rogue or feral is going to like it, but it means tick monitors are only useful in a non-full-energy system rather than being useful for jumping people at the precise point you are about to gain 20 energy (and so making it 20 energy cheaper in effect).

You aren't getting cheated out of energy in any way. You either wait 1.5 seconds for 15 energy or 0.5 seconds for 5 energy (as per your examples), both are the same regeneration rate. It simplifies the energy system significantly, and means that theres no need to rely on mods for tick rates for openers.

I'm wondering if this will affect having 90 energy, then waiting 1.5 seconds before using an ability. Do you lose the 5 energy which you should have lost in the intervening 0.5 seconds or not?