Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Public Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06/08/08, 11:46 PM   #4026
Axanor
Don Flamenco
 
Axanor's Avatar
 
Tauren Druid
 
Area 52
Originally Posted by flyingtoastr View Post
I really hope Malygos isn't a creme boss. He's an aspect, if we're given a simple "tank and spank dragon" a la ony I will be very disappointed.
If they indeed move back to 8-piece sets, he could easily become the "Onyxia" of the T8 content, dropping 1 part of the Tier 8 set.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 2:22 AM   #4027
flyingtoastr
Bald Bull
 
flyingtoastr's Avatar
 
Human Paladin
 
Draka
Originally Posted by Axanor View Post
If they indeed move back to 8-piece sets, he could easily become the "Onyxia" of the T8 content, dropping 1 part of the Tier 8 set.
I don't mean ony for gear position, I mean ony for "simple entry 1-boss instance". Malygos is an aspect and he should thus be just that hard to beat. With such a major figure in lore it would be a serious disappointment if he was an "entry level pushover" (much like a good deal of TBC sadly).

United States Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 2:25 AM   #4028
Axanor
Don Flamenco
 
Axanor's Avatar
 
Tauren Druid
 
Area 52
Originally Posted by flyingtoastr View Post
I don't mean ony for gear position, I mean ony for "simple entry 1-boss instance". Malygos is an aspect and he should thus be just that hard to beat. With such a major figure in lore it would be a serious disappointment if he was an "entry level pushover" (much like a good deal of TBC sadly).
Yeah, I don't think he would be simply due to the fact that Naxx is likely going to be the only T7 zone.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 5:05 AM   #4029
Mideci
Great Tiger
 
Gnome Rogue
 
Stormrage
Originally Posted by orcsgotbooty View Post
The thing is with BT class trinkets they had a phenomenal opportunity to fix this, to be honest I know some of the trinkets are actually halfway decent (rogue/hunter), but at least personally the warrior one is a complete and utter joke. I'm not sure someone would have used it if it was a drop at level 60 let alone now.
"Decent" is not a fix. Never has been, never will be. If the best trinket is on Gruul or Hex Lord, people will want that. Many of us will not stop until we've improved our character to the maximum it can be. And there either needs to be a way to ultimately buy that trinket off a rep vendor after 8 billion Gruuls or there needs to be an unambiguously better trinket in the next tier of content -- actually there needs to be 2 when it's trinkets. If not, we are suck sitting in Gruul after Gruul after Gruul. I had to do more than 50 personally. Not at all fun.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 5:32 AM   #4030
Malleus
King Hippo
 
Human Paladin
 
Bronze Dragonflight (EU)
Originally Posted by Axanor View Post
Yeah, I don't think he would be simply due to the fact that Naxx is likely going to be the only T7 zone.
Do you think they'll retain the T3 system whereby every boss can potentially drop a piece? If not, I'm wondering how they'll do it.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 5:37 AM   #4031
Axanor
Don Flamenco
 
Axanor's Avatar
 
Tauren Druid
 
Area 52
Originally Posted by Malleus View Post
Do you think they'll retain the T3 system whereby every boss can potentially drop a piece? If not, I'm wondering how they'll do it.
A neat way to do it would be to have the first boss in a wing drop 1 tier piece, the boss behind him drop 2 of the same piece, and then to have the "Big Boss" of the wing drop 3 of his set piece. And of course Gluth would be the wonderful slot machine he was before.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 5:47 AM   #4032
Miststorm
Glass Joe
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Nordrassil (EU)
I wonder if they will change the combat ratings formula again?

If the 61-70 formula is extended to 80, then at 80, we will need 138% more rating for the same effect at 70. If they do not change their itemisation formula again, that would indicate a huge amount of inflation in gear incoming, completely out of line with their intentions and the change in power coming in the base abilities.

Hopefully they will change ratings in the 61+ range such that you will need 5% more rating per level (that would result in 63% more per 10 levels), which seems to be reasonable level of inflation.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 7:53 AM   #4033
Xelopheris
Piston Honda
 
Xelopheris's Avatar
 
Orc Death Knight
 
Dunemaul
Originally Posted by Malleus View Post
Do you think they'll retain the T3 system whereby every boss can potentially drop a piece? If not, I'm wondering how they'll do it.
Put tier pieces on the wing end bosses and Sapphiron/Kelthuzad.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 9:15 AM   #4034
Chardonnay
Von Kaiser
 
Chardonnay's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Priest
 
Arathor (EU)
The spelldamage-only gear discussion seems pretty much void already.

PC Gamer: What else is changing?
Tom Chilton (Kalgan) : We’re also going to be doing away with spell-damage only type gear. We’ll be moving to a system that, as part of your talents, will let players convert healing into spell-damage and vice-versa as part of their talents. That way they can use the exact same gear, but their talents just adapt what it does.”


via mmo-champion.com

I wonder if the talents will convert stuff like spellhit and crit too?

Hungary Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 9:20 AM   #4035
Darbius
Glass Joe
 
Tauren Druid
 
Spirestone
Originally Posted by Chardonnay View Post
The spelldamage-only gear discussion seems pretty much void already.

PC Gamer: What else is changing?
Tom Chilton (Kalgan) : We’re also going to be doing away with spell-damage only type gear. We’ll be moving to a system that, as part of your talents, will let players convert healing into spell-damage and vice-versa as part of their talents. That way they can use the exact same gear, but their talents just adapt what it does.”


via mmo-champion.com

I wonder if the talents will convert stuff like spellhit and crit too?
Well, with the new Imp FF for balance druids giving 3% hit to melee, ranged, and spells, along with wrath totem and probably some more hit buff class abilities, I think a lot of hit is just going to come innately. After the hit you get from abilities, I imagine that gems are going to take care of the rest. I sort of like that idea when it comes to gems, it makes them feel more important and further your ability to customize your gear to your liking. Possibly no more important then it is now, but hell, feels cool to me.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 9:29 AM   #4036
 Tecton
Achievement Unlocked!
 
Tecton's Avatar
 
Worgen Druid
 
Argent Dawn (EU)
Everything seems to point to the hit cap being lowered, also, so it becomes less of a big deal.

Scotland Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 9:35 AM   #4037
Gokey
Piston Honda
 
Orc Hunter
 
Gorefiend
One begins to wonder how jewelcrafting and gems will factor in to all of this....

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 9:48 AM   #4038
Chardonnay
Von Kaiser
 
Chardonnay's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Priest
 
Arathor (EU)
Originally Posted by Tecton View Post
Everything seems to point to the hit cap being lowered, also, so it becomes less of a big deal.
That would be nice. By the way, shadow priests lost 7% hit from talents according to leaked talents. I'm really puzzled now

Hungary Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 9:52 AM   #4039
Rebellion
Glass Joe
 
Undead Warlock
 
Ysera (EU)
Originally Posted by Chardonnay View Post

I wonder if the talents will convert stuff like spellhit and crit too?
Personally i hope they wont do that. This is the last thing that would make the difference between healer and dd loot. With my current Raidsetting this would mean like 10 - 12 ppl rolling on the same loot, when it comes to trinkets, rings, cloaks and such things it were like 15-16 out of 25 ...

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 10:00 AM   #4040
Stopokingme
Don Flamenco
 
Stopokingme's Avatar
 
Orc Shaman
 
Azjol-Nerub (EU)
Originally Posted by Rebellion View Post
Personally i hope they wont do that. This is the last thing that would make the difference between healer and dd loot. With my current Raidsetting this would mean like 10 - 12 ppl rolling on the same loot, when it comes to trinkets, rings, cloaks and such things it were like 15-16 out of 25 ...
Which could in essence be solved by giving these drops a 50%/60% chance of dropping, or just doubling/tripling the amount of healer/caster drops.

Netherlands Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 10:01 AM   #4041
Zaniel
Piston Honda
 
Zaniel's Avatar
 
Night Elf Rogue
 
Aggramar
But isn't it better to have more people demanding fewer pieces of loot? Then you (ideally) wouldn't have the 6th boomkin leather drop in a row to DE. Especially once you get down to cloth, having more people looking for the same items should allow the itemizing team to make it easier to gear people, not harder. You might have to wait a little longer sometimes to get that one item, but the odds of getting said item should go up dramatically.

Anything that can get rid of the niche pieces that no one wants after the first drop is a good thing.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 10:08 AM   #4042
Lucinde
Piston Honda
 
Human Priest
 
Lightbringer (EU)
I'd be more excited if the hit-requirements at lvl 80 would go up rather than down while keeping them the same for PvP. If they then put tons of +hit on raid/tier gear and the same amount as now on arena gear, it would mean that even with all the nice sidestats, PvP gear would be utterly and completely useless for PvE.

By the looks of it they're moving towards a loot system where more people can use the same piece instead of having to DE 90% of all the farmed content loot after a few weeks of farming. The downside here is, obviously, that they would have to very carefully watch raid balance and group setups here and adjust droprates/loottables accordingly, because the last thing we're looking for is another Protector token.

As is, the average raid has ~13 clothies, ~5 mail, ~4 plate and ~3 leather. Boss loot needs to reflect this situation as clearly is not the case right now.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 10:21 AM   #4043
Floria
Piston Honda
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Kil'Jaeden
Originally Posted by Lucinde View Post
As is, the average raid has ~13 clothies, ~5 mail, ~4 plate and ~3 leather. Boss loot needs to reflect this situation as clearly is not the case right now.
Even if a raid's taking only 2 druids total (and some take 3, one of each spec), and 2 rogues, that's 4 leather, maybe 5. I'm in agreement on the mail, at least if they balance shamans so that they don't obscenely stack. You're off again on plate, where we're likely to see 3 paladins, 2 warriors (1 MT, 1 DPS), and at least 1, if not 2 Death Knights. So that's more like 6-7 plate.

Remember, this is a thread about WotLK, not a thread for bitching about TBC.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 10:23 AM   #4044
Starfire
Honorary Toastr
 
Night Elf Priest
 
Dragonblight
Originally Posted by Lucinde View Post
I'd be more excited if the hit-requirements at lvl 80 would go up rather than down while keeping them the same for PvP. If they then put tons of +hit on raid/tier gear and the same amount as now on arena gear, it would mean that even with all the nice sidestats, PvP gear would be utterly and completely useless for PvE.

By the looks of it they're moving towards a loot system where more people can use the same piece instead of having to DE 90% of all the farmed content loot after a few weeks of farming. The downside here is, obviously, that they would have to very carefully watch raid balance and group setups here and adjust droprates/loottables accordingly, because the last thing we're looking for is another Protector token.

As is, the average raid has ~13 clothies, ~5 mail, ~4 plate and ~3 leather. Boss loot needs to reflect this situation as clearly is not the case right now.
Not to mention some of your leather wearers and mail wearers end up stealing cloth or would like to steal cloth too -_-.

United States Online
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 10:26 AM   #4045
Stopokingme
Don Flamenco
 
Stopokingme's Avatar
 
Orc Shaman
 
Azjol-Nerub (EU)
This leads me to thinking, would it actually be such a bad idea if raid drops were just a magic item, with certain stats attached to it, which you could take to your local dungeon tailor/leatherworker/mailsmith/platesmith, who can convert it into your classes armor type? Would lead to much less wasted loot/shards.

Netherlands Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 10:36 AM   #4046
Prinsesa
Bald Bull
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Echo Isles
From the Blizzcast:

In Utgarde Keep, the first dungeon players will explore, developpers try to vary up the architecture from room to room so it feels and look a little bit different, different creatures are used in the different rooms. Various crowd control types can be used throughout the instances, so the dragons can be hibernated, there is humanoids, undead for the different crowd control types all have options in the dungeon. There are also some really cool scripted boss fights too.
While I appreciate having different architecture given the "rail shooter-type hallways" comments of TBC dungeons, does anyone else think the idea of having relatively diverse mob types is a bad one?

That is, some classes are preferred over others by virtue of their CCs, depending on the dungeon - a Shadow Priest shines in Magister's Terrace thanks to Mind Control, while a Warlock is great help on banishing the Underbog's elementals.

It seems to me that making mob types far less consistent is going to hurt more than help because of target limitations on the CCs, unless there are specific points which are especially hard.

"We do want Sanctuary to be the tanking seal"

- Ghostcrawler

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 10:38 AM   #4047
flyingtoastr
Bald Bull
 
flyingtoastr's Avatar
 
Human Paladin
 
Draka
Originally Posted by Starfire View Post
Not to mention some of your leather wearers and mail wearers end up stealing cloth or would like to steal cloth too -_-.
Which would be fixed with decent itemization. I don't wear leather as ret because it looks cool, I do it because the plate DPS stuff is bad.

United States Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 10:43 AM   #4048
orcsgotbooty
Banned
 
Orc Warrior
 
Jaedenar
Originally Posted by Mideci View Post
"Decent" is not a fix. Never has been, never will be. If the best trinket is on Gruul or Hex Lord, people will want that. Many of us will not stop until we've improved our character to the maximum it can be. And there either needs to be a way to ultimately buy that trinket off a rep vendor after 8 billion Gruuls or there needs to be an unambiguously better trinket in the next tier of content -- actually there needs to be 2 when it's trinkets. If not, we are suck sitting in Gruul after Gruul after Gruul. I had to do more than 50 personally. Not at all fun.
My point was that the BT class trinkets didn't have to be as good as say skull of Guldan, but as good as the trinkets a tier behind like Tsunami Talisman. The problem is for some classes the BT class trinkets are worse than level 60 blue quest rewards.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 11:11 AM   #4049
Mr. Crow
Piston Honda
 
Human Priest
 
Medivh
Originally Posted by Prinsesa View Post
From the Blizzcast:

While I appreciate having different architecture given the "rail shooter-type hallways" comments of TBC dungeons, does anyone else think the idea of having relatively diverse mob types is a bad one?

That is, some classes are preferred over others by virtue of their CCs, depending on the dungeon - a Shadow Priest shines in Magister's Terrace thanks to Mind Control, while a Warlock is great help on banishing the Underbog's elementals.

It seems to me that making mob types far less consistent is going to hurt more than help because of target limitations on the CCs, unless there are specific points which are especially hard.
If Blizzard's intention is to make the 5-mans viable for any class composition, then it seems to me that the variety of CCs will just make the pulls easier rather than being impossible without CC. Considering that every class brings something to the table in the way of CC (except shamans, of course) it means that the DPS are going to have more to do than just spamming their spell cycles.

This mentality of "CC as a bonus" instead of "CC as a requirement" will probably scale down as you approach the level 80 5-mans. Magister's Terrace really begged for CC because of the sheer number of high-pop pulls, but that's because it was the ultimate level 70 5-man content. There were drops in the heroic mode equivalent to Kara epics, so it makes sense that you'd have to pay more attention to your party composition in there; the difficulty is that much higher. So I think that we can expect Utgarde Keep to be 5-mannable by just about anyone, but Utgarde Pinnacle (the level 80 5-man) will be a bit more particular.

The big thing to keep in mind is that Blizzard is going to save all the really hard content for level 80, the heroics, and the raids. I expect that competent players will be able to blow through the <80 5-man content, especially considering that the T6-equivalent Badge Gear they'll be toting won't be replaced until around 75-76.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 06/09/08, 11:20 AM   #4050
Malleus
King Hippo
 
Human Paladin
 
Bronze Dragonflight (EU)
Originally Posted by Chardonnay View Post
The spelldamage-only gear discussion seems pretty much void already.

PC Gamer: What else is changing?
Tom Chilton (Kalgan) : We’re also going to be doing away with spell-damage only type gear. We’ll be moving to a system that, as part of your talents, will let players convert healing into spell-damage and vice-versa as part of their talents. That way they can use the exact same gear, but their talents just adapt what it does.”
This makes no sense. First he says there'll be no spell damage only gear, then he says there'll be gear with spell damage on that can be converted to healing with talents. What gives here?

Offline
Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Public Discussion

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blizzcon Speculation; What can we expect? Forlex Public Discussion 585 08/01/07 4:56 PM