 |
12/20/07, 11:10 PM
|
#31
|
|
Von Kaiser
Blood Elf Paladin
Khadgar
|
Originally Posted by koaschten
Educated Guess:
1. 38 / 41 dps isn't like ... wow... [Rising Tide]
2. The stacking debuff could be a self-buff like the one from [The Night Blade] and only benefitting yourself.
|
The [Annihilator] proc is a debuff, not a self-buff, that does not overwrite sunder. I don't have any experience with [Rivenspike], but from the similar wording I'm guessing it's also a debuff. Whether it stacks with [Annihilator] or not, I have no idea.
|
|
|
|
|
12/20/07, 11:53 PM
|
#32
|
|
Glass Joe
|
We have a Prot Pally that busts out [Nightfall] on bosses like Gorefiend when he doesn't have to OT. So he auto attacks and helps me on cleanse duty. Seems like a good enough buff to make up for the marginal loss in already low Prot Pally dps.
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/07, 12:11 AM
|
#33
|
|
Disharmonious
Dwarf Paladin
Lightbringer
|
Originally Posted by Spatula
The [Annihilator] proc is a debuff, not a self-buff, that does not overwrite sunder. I don't have any experience with [Rivenspike], but from the similar wording I'm guessing it's also a debuff. Whether it stacks with [Annihilator] or not, I have no idea.
|
Sad self-admission: I used to use Rivenspike on my resto shaman way back when on C'thun, because it did stack with Sunder. This was back when I was a resto shaman.
I cannot imagine it being useful today, even if they somehow missed it stacking with sunder. Horrible proc rate, horrible uptime, and not much of cases where you can use it and not cause more problems than good (parries, non healing, no regen MH, I could go on).
|
Originally Posted by bartolimu
It makes me want to hit Marge Thatcher on the nose with a rolled up newspaper.
|
|
|
|
12/21/07, 12:18 AM
|
#34
|
|
Bald Bull
|
Here's a post about this topic (Nightfall) I wrote on my guild's forums. I use one (Illidan P2 when I'm not tanking) and used to use one as an OT when I was in tank gear for something in the fight.
Tested Nightfall today, was curious.
4.2 PPM, put my character on auto attack on a servant, then did other stuff. This is the results when I came back, as well as a dead character.
I used a Gorefiend WWS that totaled about 9000 caster DPS for the calculations.
The Spell Vulnerability debuff lasts 5 seconds. 15% of 9000 is 1350 DPS, so it's 1350 more damage each second for 5 seconds, or 6750 damage per proc. At 4.2 procs/minute, that's 28350 damage/minute, or 472 dps.
In full dps gear + Nightfall, spamming hamstring/overpower/whirlwind, I was doing 350 dps. The proc adds 470ish so I was adding 820 dps effectively.
In full dps gear + normal weapons, I'll do far more than that, 1000+ without a totem.
So on a fight like Gorefiend or Archimonde where you aren't sitting the tanks to just streamline things, full dps gear is still better. But anything else where there's extra tanks once the mobs die or whatnot (Illidan, etc), Nightfall will be a nice boost, and I decided to quantify it.
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/07, 12:19 AM
|
#35
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
Originally Posted by Fogbug
I can't remember any of the numbers, but I'm pretty sure the contribution from nightfal narrowly failed to make up for my lost DW DPS even in Naxx, even with 10+ casters in the group. Now granted, DW fury was really really good in naxx, but I just can't see it being nearly as good as it was then
|
Yes, but is it better when you're in full FR gear?
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/07, 12:39 AM
|
#36
|
|
Bald Bull
|
A purebread dps class/spec will always be more useful doing that, rather than using nightfall. Nightfall is just a good weapon to use when you're not a dps spec, and not in dps gear, and not in a dps group. You'll add more raidwide dps using it than any other alternative option. (Unless you're raiding with close to 0 casters, then auto attacking with no weapons equipped would probably be better).
Last edited by Xav : 12/21/07 at 12:46 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/07, 1:32 AM
|
#37
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
Originally Posted by Xaviera
A purebread dps class/spec will always be more useful doing that, rather than using nightfall. Nightfall is just a good weapon to use when you're not a dps spec, and not in dps gear, and not in a dps group. You'll add more raidwide dps using it than any other alternative option. (Unless you're raiding with close to 0 casters, then auto attacking with no weapons equipped would probably be better).
|
Not in dps gear is enough. I have 5% hit, 12% crit, -4% dodge, 900 AP in FR gear, somehow I don't think my white damage would account for much.
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/07, 5:54 AM
|
#38
|
|
Bald Bull
Roywyn
Gnome Mage
No WoW Account (EU)
|
Originally Posted by Xaviera
Tested Nightfall today, was curious.
4.2 PPM, put my character on auto attack on a servant, then did other stuff. This is the results when I came back, as well as a dead character.
I used a Gorefiend WWS that totaled about 9000 caster DPS for the calculations.
The Spell Vulnerability debuff lasts 5 seconds. 15% of 9000 is 1350 DPS, so it's 1350 more damage each second for 5 seconds, or 6750 damage per proc. At 4.2 procs/minute, that's 28350 damage/minute, or 472 dps.
In full dps gear + Nightfall, spamming hamstring/overpower/whirlwind, I was doing 350 dps. The proc adds 470ish so I was adding 820 dps effectively.
|
If procwatch still works like it used to do, it counts the "X is afflicted by Spell Vulnerability." as well as "Spell Vulnerability fades from X." messages, so your actual proc rate is half the amount listed.
Also, back then, people found out that Nightfall could only proc from regular swings. Additional instant attacks (Hamstring/Whirlwind spam) would not proc Nightfall.
Thought it should be mentioned while we're at it, and I haven't heard that it was changed.
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/07, 6:51 AM
|
#39
|
|
Glass Joe
Draenei Shaman
Stormscale (EU)
|
Thanks a lot for the information Xav. I've been wondering about this for ages but never had a chance to test it.
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/07, 7:07 AM
|
#40
|
|
Von Kaiser
Human Warlock
Shadowsong (EU)
|
Originally Posted by Overhead
1. My argument of Rivenspike not being *that* bad is that you could DW it with a 90+ dps weapon, whereas with nightfall you're stuck holding a 2H with 65 dps. This point goes away if you use both axes i listed, but then you're massively debuffing the target. Also I forgot to mention [Bashguuder], exact same effect as rivenspike (won't stack), but is OH if that makes your dps feel better.
2. I'm relatively certain it's a debuff, but someone would have to test.
|
FWIW, I used [Bashguuder] at 60. On my rogue, with S'n'D up, it was permanently up with a full stack on bosses. It was downright silly, I think I still have it in the bank somewhere. :-)
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/07, 8:49 AM
|
#41
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
I spent a lot of time farming SM arm for a ravager a couple of months back. Idea being to put rockbiter on it, pull an entire instance, twirl in place, then spend a few minutes looting. More specifically, to farm SFK for the twink drops there.
Not exactly efficient, farming armory so I can go farm a lower level instance. I came to my senses recently, and just farmed ores and honour, resulting in a S1 axe and a drakefist hammer. I'd still like a ravager, just to be able to aoe mobs, but some things are just not meant to be.
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/07, 9:26 AM
|
#42
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
Originally Posted by Lopaka
We have a Prot Pally that busts out [Nightfall] on bosses like Gorefiend when he doesn't have to OT. So he auto attacks and helps me on cleanse duty. Seems like a good enough buff to make up for the marginal loss in already low Prot Pally dps.
|
Our prot pally MTs Gorefiend. Teron is a demon, so our protadin makes sick threat.
Back on the Nightfall topic, our warrior MT claims he can get 25% or better uptime with it, by spamming hamstring. I'm not complaining, I seen a couple 6.3k frostbolts on Shade of Akama, and a destro lock in our raid popped off a 10.5k shadowbolt.
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/07, 9:38 AM
|
#43
|
|
Don Flamenco
Umm
Tauren Druid
No WoW Account
|
Originally Posted by Malan
A much better solution would be an investigation into *why* he's threat capped. Changes in our talent tree made threat almost a non-issue recently.
|
Unfortunately all tanks aren't created equally. There are times when the tank doesn't have windfury, hunters only misdirect on the pull, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/07, 8:18 PM
|
#44
|
|
Bald Bull
|
Originally Posted by Roywyn
If procwatch still works like it used to do, it counts the "X is afflicted by Spell Vulnerability." as well as "Spell Vulnerability fades from X." messages, so your actual proc rate is half the amount listed.
Also, back then, people found out that Nightfall could only proc from regular swings. Additional instant attacks (Hamstring/Whirlwind spam) would not proc Nightfall.
Thought it should be mentioned while we're at it, and I haven't heard that it was changed.
|
It doesn't count Spell Vulnerability twice, I observed this a lot. It was double counting other procs though, as I ran a similar test with Crusader. Nightfall does proc off of instant attacks, and the PPM goes up when that happens because you're raising the chance of getting the max PPM possible. In reality your PPM wont be drastically higher than what the picture shows because you're likely refreshing Thunderclap, *not* getting much rage to even spamstring, and possibly refreshing Demo shout / Command / Battle as well, as a warrior anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/07, 9:26 PM
|
#45
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
Originally Posted by Sinborn
Our prot pally MTs Gorefiend. Teron is a demon, so our protadin makes sick threat.
Back on the Nightfall topic, our warrior MT claims he can get 25% or better uptime with it, by spamming hamstring. I'm not complaining, I seen a couple 6.3k frostbolts on Shade of Akama, and a destro lock in our raid popped off a 10.5k shadowbolt.
|
the shade of akama has a stacking increase damage debuff that akama puts on shade anyways.
|
|
|
|
|