Rawr (v2.3.23 released on 9/12) - Page 141

Astrylian · 05/04/09, 4:25 AM

Yes. Sorry, forgot to mention that. Yeah, you'll see unexpected results for a few days, until 3.1.2 comes out. (Tuesday?)

Latas · 05/04/09, 4:31 AM

Are the tier set bonuses stored in the item cache or the class model itself?

Astrylian · 05/04/09, 5:33 AM

The item in the itemcache contains the name of the set it belongs to. Set bonuses are buffs, so are in the BuffCache. The stats that they provide are handled by the model.

thedopefishlives · 05/04/09, 9:42 AM

Originally Posted by Ghoselle

In the current version of RAWR (2.2.1), the additional spell damage from spirit from "Improved Moonkin Form" is not modeled. Removing or adding the talents does not change damage done. A purple gem of 9spell power & 8 spirit is valued the same as all the gems that only provide 9spell power but no other dps stat.

Check the issue that you logged on Codeplex. You have to enable the buff in the Buff tab, because Rawr.Moonkin does not automatically assume you will be in form unless you enable Moonkin Form and Improved Moonkin Form. This is by design.

Celeras · 05/05/09, 12:38 AM

In my current gear setup, glyph of lifebloom is changing the values of items pretty unrealistically(cut in half and drastically reshuffled). Not sure if its just from my perspective, or if theres a bug going on. With BiS Ulduar equipment, the difference is extremely minor and no reshuffling occurs.

Latas · 05/06/09, 5:55 AM

Is there a quick and easy way I could change the spellpower from spirit conversion of Imp Moonkin Form in rawr or is that within the module itself? I looked in the buff cache but all I could find there was the haste increase.

Igniter · 05/06/09, 6:02 AM

I'm a foreigner teaching in China trying to use rawr on an English/Chinese operating system with no luck.

When extracted in anything but winzip, there is an error sound at 88% and this error comes (translated from Chinese): Normal application initialization (0xc0000135) failed. Please click "OK", the suspension should be the procedure.

When extracted with winzip there is no error sound but the same error appears.

ninor · 05/06/09, 7:33 AM

How does Rawr try to use JC prismatic gems?

I'm getting some very strange options from the optimizer regarding this with 2.2.2. An example is [Handwraps of the Vigilant], this has 2 yellow slots and Rawr wants to use a red gem and a prismatic, resulting in no slot bonus. At the same time it puts a red gem in [Drape of Mortal Downfall] instead of using the prismatic there for a free 5 spelldamage. It's a minor issue since it's fairly easy to do the gems manually.

I should mention this was with thoroughness set to max.

thedopefishlives · 05/06/09, 9:17 AM

Originally Posted by Latas

Is there a quick and easy way I could change the spellpower from spirit conversion of Imp Moonkin Form in rawr or is that within the module itself? I looked in the buff cache but all I could find there was the haste increase.

It's built into the module because it is a selfish buff only. If you want to update it to 3.1.2, I've already beaten you to it; it's in the latest source code. If you're trying to figure out why the Spirit->SP conversion isn't working, make sure you've enabled both Moonkin Form and Imp Moonkin Form on the Buffs tab, or you will not get any of the form-related benefits.

SeanDamnit · 05/06/09, 11:13 AM

Originally Posted by ninor

How does Rawr try to use JC prismatic gems?

I'm getting some very strange options from the optimizer regarding this with 2.2.2. An example is [Handwraps of the Vigilant], this has 2 yellow slots and Rawr wants to use a red gem and a prismatic, resulting in no slot bonus. At the same time it puts a red gem in [Drape of Mortal Downfall] instead of using the prismatic there for a free 5 spelldamage. It's a minor issue since it's fairly easy to do the gems manually.

I had this issue too, and it ended up being a problem with the thoroughness of the optimizer. Just set it to max and you won't see the issue anymore. It's nice that the optimizer is significantly faster, so setting it at max thoroughness isn't a big deal anymore.

Endoscient · 05/06/09, 12:30 PM

Originally Posted by Igniter

I'm a foreigner teaching in China trying to use rawr on an English/Chinese operating system with no luck.

When extracted in anything but winzip, there is an error sound at 88% and this error comes (translated from Chinese): Normal application initialization (0xc0000135) failed. Please click "OK", the suspension should be the procedure.

When extracted with winzip there is no error sound but the same error appears.

You really should do some research on this error on your own. From the readme.txt that is included with Rawr.

Q: I get an error on load, "To run this application you must first install..." or "The application failed to initialize properly (0xc0000135)." How do I fix this?
A: Install .NET Framework 2.0 from Microsoft. If it still doesn't work, uninstall .NET Framework completely, reinstall .NET Framework 2.0, and try Rawr again. Download link for .NET Framework 2.0 from Microsoft: Download details: .NET Framework Version 2.0 Redistributable Package (x86)

If you put the error code into Google you would also be able to easily find out the solution.

Igniter · 05/07/09, 12:33 AM

Originally Posted by Endoscient

You really should do some research on this error on your own. From the readme.txt that is included with Rawr.

If you put the error code into Google you would also be able to easily find out the solution.

As google likes to auto translate any text into Chinese (doesnt matter if it's google.com/ca/cn), it's sort of difficult. I appreciate the help, even if it's with an attitude.

Latas · 05/07/09, 4:41 AM

I've found if I make a set with 4t8 and then add a 5th piece it will still put the set bonus towards all the pieces (at least the helm). For example if I put all 5 t8 pieces in and then check on the helm it still shows the t8 helm as about 400 dps over collar of the wyrmhunter which I am pretty sure would be incorrect if the helm were the 5th piece.

thedopefishlives · 05/07/09, 9:09 AM

Originally Posted by Latas

I've found if I make a set with 4t8 and then add a 5th piece it will still put the set bonus towards all the pieces (at least the helm). For example if I put all 5 t8 pieces in and then check on the helm it still shows the t8 helm as about 400 dps over collar of the wyrmhunter which I am pretty sure would be incorrect if the helm were the 5th piece.

That means one of your pieces has an incorrectly named set bonus. Make sure it's for the correct set - if you're a moonkin or tree, sometimes the set pieces for the other spec do look appealing on the upgrade charts.

Latas · 05/07/09, 10:30 PM

Originally Posted by thedopefishlives

That means one of your pieces has an incorrectly named set bonus. Make sure it's for the correct set - if you're a moonkin or tree, sometimes the set pieces for the other spec do look appealing on the upgrade charts.

Crap thats exactly what it was, the chest and gloves of the resto set are better itemized than the balance set.