|
I'd prefer to avoid the specific class discussion that happened in the last thread on this topic, I am more interested in the interpersonal and administrative aspects of being a healing lead than the statistical.
|
I'm glad you asked. I (mage) organise all of the healing / group setup in our guild. Theres a bunch of factors to consider when looking for a good 'healing organiser' and what qualities they need:
1 - It needs to be someone who can confidently take control of 4 different classes, with the authority to get them to conform to the guilds chosen strat/method of organising healing for that fight.
2 - It needs to be someone who understands and knows the strength's and weakness of each respective healing
class - and assign them to a role on a fight they can excel at. People like this will often be reading forums like elitistjerks class mechanics - and have a good knowledge of how other classes work (even if they don't actually play it themself!)
3 - It needs to be someone who understands and knows the strength's and weaknesses of each
player and assign people-to-roles with their skill/ability in mind. This is very important too.
4 - It needs to be someone who can quickly understand, analyse, isolate and find problems in healing and know how to fix them. Someone who uses WWS, recount / SWstats etc - and can basically say, "OK, this is what went wrong....". Its terrible when you wipe continuously due to healing problems and nobody seems to be able to find an answer to the question, "So why are we wiping?" Someone like this will be able to point out and fix problems in the raid - but also analyse WWS afterwards and use it as a reference to make improvements in future.
5 - It should be someone who also has (A) and can also set groups up as necessary. Your healing organiser will want to make sure that COH is being used effectively and set groups up accordingly (EG, Bloodboil, Phase 2 illidan) and that your shamans are spread into their correct groups. They'll make sure your preferred raid-healer gets a shadow priest and that all the general-duties of group setup (pallys auras->tanks, druid in mt group, coh raid priest->shadow priest etc) are done correctly. I dont think anyone that organises healing can really excel fully at the job unless they are also given (A) to have some control over group setup.
====
Those are five things a good healing organiser needs to be able to do. You might have a fantastic raid leader, but if they dont really have the ability to execute most of those points - your selling yourself short. It might seem obvious - but the healing organiser doesnt necessarily need to actually play a healer, either.
In my experience, the worst thing you can tell 8 healers with regards to handling healing on a fight is = "Ok guys , just work it out yourselves". Yes, you probably can still kill bosses doing this - but its just such a waste - and so much more inefficient/messy - you are probably much better off with someone strong (with the aforementioned qualities) take control.
I put up a WWS after each raid and teach any new recruits unfamiliar with WWS how to understand and use it. I recommend guilds have a dedicated (if they dont already) WWS forum and a brief explanation of how to interpret it. You want all your healers to be able to go there after raids and check their performance, find out whether they did good/poor and compare it with others etc. When you have healers asking after a raid "When are you putting up the WWS??" its a great feeling - people actually care about their performance and want to improve.
Another thing Ill just throw out there. We have two specific channels all healers must join for raids. One is the GuildClass channel (EG FCpaladin) and the other is the general healing channel (EG FChealer). All healers (from all 4 classes) must be in the general healing channel during raids - and we can help people, talk about problems etc etc exclusively in there without needing to clutter raid chat. I also recommend the tanks stay in this channel too - so we can get some good healer<--->tank feedback where necessary.
PS - This is a good thread. Organising four classes, with potentially 8-11 people - is definetely something worth discussing.