Originally Posted by Elhandil
If that is true, why do we need a new Lich King to control the Scourge remnant ? ;-)
|
While in lack of leaders, you have to remember Scourge casualties aren't actually
that big a percentage of the whole army. As I've pointed before, we've fought the Scourge through "take out the head" operations, so most of the army is still alive. Plus, there's casualties on our side every day, corpses still ripe for raising, etc. The last Scourge frontal assaults were Quel'thalas and Dalaran, and we know how those went - downhill steamroll. And it's now significantly bigger, even without the Lich King (which wasn't present at either of those battles, as well).
Are you completely sure Varian would rush to stop a Scourge invasion on Horde territory? I know he's not a monster, but it wouldn't be the first time a general considered letting another army serve as speed bump for a common enemy - of course, without the other knowing. As to the inverse situation, I do think Thrall would like to go to the Alliance's aid, but there's the question of Garrosh's growing influence...
Honestly, I can't find a suitable explanation for Arthas' "holding back" attitude. Yes, it could be explained by his regal background and education, him raising a kingdom before taking on the other races. Yet the minute we get to Northrend, it's already full of camps and bases of the Horde/Alliance and we pretty much plow through every Scourge operation. No, it's...really not working. It doesn't make sense. As a general, you do the best you can with what you have. If your troop numbers vastly outweight you opponent's, you use that, period, unless they have something that nullifies that advantage. As long as Arthas doesn't just send his forces towards the front gate and waits to see what happens - and we know both him andNer'zhul to be good strategists - he should be able to take any enemy base in Azeroth.