Elitist Jerks

Elitist Jerks (http://elitistjerks.com/forums.php)
-   Public Discussion (http://elitistjerks.com/f15/)
-   -   Content delivery in WoW (http://elitistjerks.com/f15/t6358-content_delivery_wow/)

Greybone 04/21/06 7:19 AM

This is a old topic for many of you I'm sure, but I'd like some input.

I've been discussing a bit at work with a co-worker of mine. He plays EQ2, and we've talked a bit about the differences between the games, and especially how things are as a end-game raider.

I don't really care which game is 'best' or whatever, but there's a striking difference in available content that's interesting.

WoW has had a extremely limited amount of new content since launch. We've gotten 2 new raid zones, 2 20-man zones, a few dragons and demons and whatnot, and a couple 5-man zones, all in a year and a half. We've been there, done that, for everything, a million times over.

Meanwhile, EQ2 has gotten (according to my co-worker) a hell of a lot more. They're still unlocking new zones and are far from conquering all the existing content. Every day they go raid something different.

One of the things that lead to my WoW burn-out was definately the lack of things to do. I'd done almost every quest available to me, most of which had zero to mediocre rewards, and I wasn't insane enough to start the BG grind.

I'd raid whenever we had the chance, which wasn't that often, and it would be the same old content over and over once we mastered the initial encounter.
Then what?

Progression in WoW is limited to items, enchants for said items, and reputation.
There's no new quests with good rewards, there's no long questlines, there's no advancement to new dungeons and raid instances.

They've added a questline to upgrade your blue set, which is largely irrelevant to raiders, and they've added more reputation grinds. My questlog didn't change much the last 8 months I played.

Now, we've talked about the expansion, and how it will solve everything. We'll get 10 more levels with quests and fun stuff to do, we'll get more instances we can work at simultaneously, as well as raid zones and long questlines to unlock said zones.

There's a few things I'm wondering about:

1) IS wow's content delivery so slow compared to other games/what one would expect?

2) If so, why does blizzard have so few content developers when it should easily be a process they can branch out and have multiple developement teams working on simultaneously?
edit: :)

3) Is lack of content a real issue for a majority of the WoW player base, or is it limited to hardcore raiders with way too much free time on their hands?

4) Is blizzard content with settling for boxsales, thus downprioritizing development of new content? (co-workers theory)

Zellyn 04/21/06 7:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ex-Greybone,April 21st, 2006 @ 6:19AM
parallelizable

Never, ever do that again. If you must, use this instead.

I think that the people who burn out the quickest are the hardcore raiders. I can count the number of MC, ZG and AQ20 runs I've done on one hand (not cumulatively, but for each). The events are still exciting, but I just really love running around like a wacko stabbing things. On the other hand, once I've seen Ragnaros go down (not yet, probably this weekend) a few times I imagine I'll lose my interest in it.

I will, however, continue to romanticize about things like BWL and AQ40. I've seen the animations for C'thun's eye and body rising up from below, and I wish I could see them in action, with all the other purty things going on. As a rogue, fighting Vael (or more specifically, getting Essence of the Red) makes me all hot in the pants. Will I still enjoy in after doing it a billion times? No.

To form an accurate comparison of the two games, though, you need to have someone who has played both. Are all those zones your friend says exist really well defined and thought out? Some of the BWL and AQ events make me smile just reading about how in depth they are. Even some of the hokie ones in MC, like Domo, are still fun to me. For example, I can easily compare the end-games of FFXI and WoW, and I can easily tell you there is fuck-all to do in that game but grind, craft and fight over boss spawns.

As for sales vs development, I don't think that Blizzard needs to worry about sales as much anymore. They have the largest market share of all the MMOs. I think they're starting to shift into a content-production mode. I think they've realized that the issue with people like you is that they're trying to cure having their fingers chopped off with massive blood infusions without stopping the bleeding first. I think Naxxramas is meant to act like a hot iron. It'll hurt like fuck, and stop the bleeding, but it'll give them the time necessary to get the expansion out, which will hopefully mean way more shit for even hardcore raiders to do in a week than before. Ideally, though, Naxxramas and Kel'Thuzad won't end up like C'thun and just be a brick wall between domination of the end-game.

XI- 04/21/06 7:38 AM

Here's my problem with the content delivery. I could deal with the slow rate of content delivery, if when it was delivered, IT ALL WORKED. And if they could stop incessantly breaking crap unrelated to anything else (*cough* seal fate *cough*).

Lailla 04/21/06 7:46 AM

I'm not familiar with MMOs outside of WoW, so I can't say much for your first two questions.

I play 30+ hours a week and one of the biggest ways that I've combatted boredom is through alts. Doing pubbie groups in a different role, running MC and praying your setpieces drop, and doing ZG/AQ20 to get free, uncontested upgrades is a lot of fun to me. Hell, I spent a few hundred gold this week on coins and bijous to power my druid to exalted so I can start bringing my mage while ZG still holds upgrades for her.

Though even the alt game gets old. After 3 level 60s and a few stagnant 20s, I cannot, cannot, CANNOT bear the thought of doing the same old alliance quests again. I started an undead warlock here on Mal'ganis, but it's really hard to push through the levels without any kind of social support (thanks Relwin :angry: ).

The only reason most of us still play is because of the social environment we play in. In a tight-knit guild, there's always someone to talk to or quest with or go to Wailing Caverns and fish 200 deviate fish with (pre-deviate fish schools :( ). For most pubbies, it's the same way. As long as there's some social stimulation, a person will be likely to keep playing. What good is running UBRS 200 times for Painweaver if you don't have anyone to be happy for you when you finally get it? Who cares if you did all the quests and got all the rewards if when you finish them there is nothing to do?

I've never been in a guild that lagged behind in raid progression, so I'm not sure exactly what that feels like. I would imagine that even a guild learning MC right now is ridiculously excited every time they down a new boss. Nerd screams from downing a new boss are awesome. (We got Twin Emps last night and I only wish I could hear nerd screams more often!)

Since Blizzard doesn't have to provide the social environment that keeps this game so successful, I can see why they would be more interested in box sales than keeping the content fresh and working. Broken C'Thun affects a tiny, tiny fraction of WoW's population. So really, why would Blizzard care?

Drauk 04/21/06 8:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ex-Greybone,April 21st, 2006 @ 6:19AM
1) IS wow's content delivery so slow compared to other games/what one would expect?

2) If so, why does blizzard have so few content developers when it should easily be a process they can branch out and have multiple developement teams working on simultaneously?
edit: :)

3) Is lack of content a real issue for a majority of the WoW player base, or is it limited to hardcore raiders with way too much free time on their hands?

4) Is blizzard content with settling for boxsales, thus downprioritizing development of new content? (co-workers theory)

1) Yes, it is very slow. And they are artificially slowing it, by not releasing smaller patches. Im ok with Naxx being 1.11, but why they cant release smaller patches ? NR items, keyring, etc ?

2) Because it was always Blizzard way. And they can't hire enough people for some reason or another. Also it seems that a lot of content team is busy working on BC

3) Actually i think it is a bigger issue for casuals than raiders. Raiders at least have BWL and AQ as more or less modern and actual content. What does casuals have ? Re-itemized strat, scholo and BRD/BRS, visited more times that raiders visited raid instances ?

4) No, they are putting as much new content as they could. They really can't make it faster without hiring more people and/or drasctical changes to development process.

Elerion 04/21/06 8:35 AM

There are three reasons content delivery in WoW has this glacial pace:

1. The Blizzard Reputation. Blizzard has a reputation for putting out top notch shit, with minimal bugs and strong balance, and maintaining that through a few well placed patches. They will run into issues with losing this image if they release stuff that is as buggy as some of what we saw in EQ. Sure, C'Thun is buggy, but until this shitstorm began, barely 1% of the playerbase cared, and it was usually the well informed portion. Most the players that bought this game because it said "warcraft" or "blizzard" don't give a shit about C'Thun. Thus, they want maximum development time on the content, and they want it to be interesting when it's released. We'll have to give them that: Most the content in this game is brilliant, far better than 90% of what EQ had (and by reports, EQ2). It's just that there's too little of it.
2. Catering to everyone. WoW wants to please every single gamer out there, from the housewife that plays 4 hours a week with her son to the hardcore 12 hours a day raider or honor grinder. They also want to have a working PvE game AND a working PvP game. All this results in each area getting less attention and content than if they were more focused on one part of the playerbase (EQ PoP for raiders, for example). The PvE + PvP issue in particular makes it really hard to have a decent raid progression. Of course, they only want to please each of their players enough that they keep playing, which leads me to point 3:
3. It's cost efficient. Paying content designers and QA teams is expensive. Free content offers no marginal revenue, even though it can have an opportunity cost of lost subscriptions if it's ignored. Thus, they want to keep the content delivery at just the right speed that not too many people leave, and that the costs in making it aren't too big.

Dargoth 04/21/06 8:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elerion,April 21st, 2006 @ 7:35AM
There are three reasons content delivery in WoW has this glacial pace:

1. The Blizzard Reputation. Blizzard has a reputation for putting out top notch shit, with minimal bugs and strong balance, and maintaining that through a few well placed patches. They will run into issues with losing this image if they release stuff that is as buggy as some of what we saw in EQ. Sure, C'Thun is buggy, but until this shitstorm began, barely 1% of the playerbase cared, and it was usually the well informed portion. Most the players that bought this game because it said "warcraft" or "blizzard" don't give a shit about C'Thun. Thus, they want maximum development time on the content, and they want it to be interesting when it's released. We'll have to give them that: Most the content in this game is brilliant, far better than 90% of what EQ had (and by reports, EQ2). It's just that there's too little of it.
2. Catering to everyone. WoW wants to please every single gamer out there, from the housewife that plays 4 hours a week with her son to the hardcore 12 hours a day raider or honor grinder. They also want to have a working PvE game AND a working PvP game. All this results in each area getting less attention and content than if they were more focused on one part of the playerbase (EQ PoP for raiders, for example). The PvE + PvP issue in particular makes it really hard to have a decent raid progression. Of course, they only want to please each of their players enough that they keep playing, which leads me to point 3:
3. It's cost efficient. Paying content designers and QA teams is expensive. Free content offers no marginal revenue, even though it can have an opportunity cost of lost subscriptions if it's ignored. Thus, they want to keep the content delivery at just the right speed that not too many people leave, and that the costs in making it aren't too big.

Only major thing I see here is:

If you release more content - some of which will indeed be buggy - you won't have so many fucking angry raiders because they'll actually have something to do other than bang their heads against C'Thun for 8 weeks. I highly doubt many guilds would have had a problem with 'Oh C'Thun is still untuned. Let's go try to make some headway in Naxxramus/other 40 man concurrently released.' Rather than having nothing to do but C'Thun or 3 hour BWL/MC clears.

Elerion 04/21/06 9:51 AM

Obviously they screwed up with C'Thun, they went too far. They're still pacing content release such that it barely keeps the majority playing, which is the most cost efficient way of going about it.

Would we have more fun if their Dev/Designer/QA teams were three times as large and made content of this quality at three times the speed and handled problems quicker? Yes. Would Blizzard/Vivendi make more money? No.

Dricen 04/21/06 10:21 AM

As someone mentioned before, Blizzard is trying to please every type of gamer, and delivering content for all, the result of this: content release for a particular group will be slow, whereas content release for the game as a whole is in a nice pace.

If you sum up all the content release and changes overall (all gamer groups), WoW is doing fine, it's the specific content release pace that is screwed, this of course is due to the "please everyone" mentality Blizz seems to be opting for.

Now you need to ask yourself, why should they change?, they're already the MMO with the biggest subscriber base, and in all honesty they don't have any solid competition, EQ2 is the closest competition they have and it's not even close because :

a) too many people are afraid to go back to an SoE game
B) too many people played EQ2 in its early release form and didn't like it
c) game just isn't appealing enough

In it's current form, and with their current content release pace, they have the strongest MMO playerbase, and they don't have a reason to change it, sure they have people here and there taht quit, but it's not a menacing majority, so they don't really care enough to make a solid investment into widening the development budget.

Also if you notice EQ focused to please raiders, hence the very fast content release rate, EQ2 also focuses on high end content, they do however focus on pvpers (now) , and a bit on casuals (with their solo content release) , but it's only a minor concern, unlike blizzard who cherishes casuals.

Until the day where WoW has some pretty rough solid competition in a particular department (pvp, casual, hardcore raiding) , they simply won't change their model, because they way it's functioning now, and with their current development budget, they just don't have to, because they still have the best playerbase, for them right now it's the good ol' "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and from a business perspective, i wouldn't change it either, as a gamer, it sucks, but as a businessman it's just good moneymaking, and after all, that's what they're looking for.

PS: english aint first language so take it ez =)

Ghostz 04/21/06 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elerion,April 21st, 2006 @ 8:51AM
Would we have more fun if their Dev/Designer/QA teams were three times as large and made content of this quality at three times the speed and handled problems quicker? Yes. Would Blizzard/Vivendi make more money? No.

Would they retain more long-term customers? Yes.
Would they retain their reputation as pretty much the top video game designer? Yes.

I believe Blizzard have realized that keeping their customers happy should be their number one priority. Thats why they take that extra year to make sure their game was released at its full potential. That is why Starcraft Ghost was scrapped for now even though they spent years developing it. Is that not a lot of money down the drain? Is spending an extra year developing a title to polish it off and make sure everyone enjoys it not extra money? Hiring more development teams falls under the same category, spending money to keep their customers be happy.

Its all part of marketting, look at EQ and EQ2, many raiders don't want to go to EQ2 just because of their experiences with the original. On the other hand, Blizzard released quality game after quality game and on the release of WoW I'm sure a ton of those initial subscribers' main selling point was the Blizzard tag on the box. If they keep that trend up, they will have the same effect when their next title comes out. Its a much better idea to spend some extra money now and reap its benefits later down the line.

Dricen 04/21/06 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghostz,April 21st, 2006 @ 9:22AM
Quote:

Originally Posted by Elerion,April 21st, 2006 @ 8:51AM
Would we have more fun if their Dev/Designer/QA teams were three times as large and made content of this quality at three times the speed and handled problems quicker? Yes. Would Blizzard/Vivendi make more money? No.

Would they retain more long-term customers? Yes.
Would they retain their reputation as pretty much the top video game designer? Yes.

I believe Blizzard have realized that keeping their customers happy should be their number one priority. Thats why they take that extra year to make sure their game was released at its full potential. That is why Starcraft Ghost was scrapped for now even though they spent years developing it. Is that not a lot of money down the drain? Is spending an extra year developing a title to polish it off and make sure everyone enjoys it not extra money? Hiring more development teams falls under the same category, spending money to keep their customers be happy.

Its all part of marketting, look at EQ and EQ2, many raiders don't want to go to EQ2 just because of their experiences with the original. On the other hand, Blizzard released quality game after quality game and on the release of WoW I'm sure a ton of those initial subscribers' main selling point was the Blizzard tag on the box. If they keep that trend up, they will have the same effect when their next title comes out. Its a much better idea to spend some extra money now and reap its benefits later down the line.

Although i completely agree with you, i just do not think blizzard has realized this yet, because WoW is still a young game, they haven't reached that point where they have to start worrying about keeping their longterm players, which are hardcore raiders, casuals and pvpers come and go as fast as lightning, but raiders stick it in the long term.

Consider that releasing a polished and well made game isn't easy, blizzard has done it pretty well in the past, however, an MMO is a whole different cookie, the insane large amount of content in an MMO makes it very hard to have absolutely all well polished. WoW is by far the most overall polished MMO, and even though they have had their screwups, specially most recently with AQ, it is still the most polished MMO to this day, and it shows in their playerbase.

When they start having playerbase issues, they will go into "omg lets please the longterm raiders" mode, until then, they'll keep their current model. And even if they hire 10+ gamers to tell them what works ( hello furor, tig, indalamar), those gamers in the end, don't make the big decisions, and the big CEO doesn't care about "long term raiders", he cares about the money he's making from the game in it's current form.

subscience 04/21/06 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lailla,April 21st, 2006 @ 6:46AM
I'm not familiar with MMOs outside of WoW, so I can't say much for your first two questions.

Compared to the two other MMOs I played as much as WoW (UO and L2), WoW blows them all out of the water. Then again, one is pretty dated by today's standards and the other one is solely populated by farmers.

I played AC2 for a bit and their content updates blew me away. Sure; it wasn't a great MMO, but the effort and creativity they seemingly put into each patch was astounding- Entire areas would go from green rolling hills to snow covered hilltops to a scarred war ground depending on the lore and player interaction (to a degree). Although only monthly, I don't think any updates in any other game made me more excited than AC2's.

Dargoth 04/21/06 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dricen,April 21st, 2006 @ 9:21AM
As someone mentioned before, Blizzard is trying to please every type of gamer, and delivering content for all, the result of this: content release for a particular group will be slow, whereas content release for the game as a whole is in a nice pace.

Eh, I don't know. Raiders are bored. Casuals are bored. PvP'ers are bored. The Tier 0.5 stuff that was supposed to tide casuals over for a good while (presumably through the Naxxramus patch) has already been exhausted by many non-raiding types on my server, since most of them already had their blue sets (or most of it). PvP'ers haven't gotten anything new in months (aside from nerfs) and raiders get 1 instance at a time to do with little to look forward to but the next PTR and being free beta testers. I personally think the content pace sucks thus far. I realize in EQ2 they just drum up some generic terrain and call it a new zone and release an expansion, but the crawling pace of content with WoW is annoying.

I'm sure there are business reasons, they have to realize how addicted most of their player base is. They know most players, casual or not, will complain for a good while before actually doing anything about it.\

I think this sort of ties into the item progression discussion in another thread, as well as comments about the lack of any completely dominating dungeon that's actually open for us to aspire to actually progress toward. This new dungeon->last boss impossible->nerf to killable week before new dungeon->last boss impossible->nerf to killable week before new dungeon->last boss impossible->nerf to killable routine is becoming, well, routine.

Dricen 04/21/06 11:36 AM

you might have not understood what i meant :) , i actually agree with what you've said, content IS slow paced, but content for a particular group.

What i mean is content as a whole is on an ok pace , they release reviews, changes to BGs, the t0.5 sets, changes to 5man 10mans, AQ, AQ20, but the content is spread out among different player groups, which results in each group seeing it as slow, thus ending bored.

This is what i believe is the main problem with WoW, they're trying to please everybody, but that just doesn't work and will not work unless they seriously increase their investment in content development, because as it stands now, they're just dont have the content to please them, and the problem is they have the potential to do it (seeing how much money they're making), but since their subscribtion rates are still fine, there's no need to change them, and that subscribtion rate is fine because there just isn't any other solid strong MMO competitor out there.

Praetorian 04/21/06 11:42 AM

I get the impression that a good old-fashioned management consulting firm would have a field day with Blizzard's production infrastructure. I'd love to peek behind the curtain and see for myself, but based on a lot of the results and communication observed, it really seems like half the time the right hand doesn't know what the left is doing.

That's the problem with just saying "add more teams to work on more content in parallel." I think the way the Blizzard production cycle may work, that would just lead to incredible chaos.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 1:29 AM.

Forum Infrastructure by vBulletin 3.6.12 ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.