Elitist Jerks

Elitist Jerks (http://elitistjerks.com/forums.php)
-   Public Discussion (http://elitistjerks.com/f15/)
-   -   How to make healers use HoTs?>:O (http://elitistjerks.com/f15/t7152-how_make_healers_use_hots_o/)

Playered 07/03/06 11:30 AM

So our guild is doing quite well.. despite the fact our healing overall is pretty crap, pretty damned crap tbh
Tanks die stupidly, meatshields die quickly, every huhuran brings me an adrenaline rush to see how low my hp goes before i receive even 1 heal etc.

And one of the key things I think is missing is a lack of HoT usage in general... sure the druids use it occasionally, but our tanks almost never have 2 HoTs on them at once, let alone anyone else having 1 at all for most fights.

Two reasons why I think this happens... one being that they dont understand how HoTs work exactly for a side-effective damage mitigation/general healing style, and the other being the healing/overhealing/effective healing meter... (god knows why so much is focused on this thing...)

also strange comments like "i cant keep more than 1 group HoT'd at once" or "its only 400 a tick..." just seem wrong as a former healer/hot abuser.... btw we're alliance (aka loladins-nocry-massmana) with quite a few druids (innervate plix) so even an intensive continuous casting should be able to be maintained on certain fights, atleast for awhile (aka huhu 30%)

Am i completly wrong in thinking how good HoTs are? are our priests/druids retarded?

any kind of backup with number/crunching or what'have'you appreciated :P

Angerz 07/03/06 11:50 AM

Just using top ranks for numbers, I dont know which spells druids actually use.

Healing touch is about 3.13 Heal/Mana and about 714 Heal/Sec for 860 mana and can crit

Rejuv is 2.47 Heal/Mana and 74 heal/second for 360 mana.

(correct me if I messed this up somewhere, or someone do talented math)

I guess if you just look at the raw numbers, you wouldnt use Rejuv much if at all, but just looking at raw numbers is dumb.

First, they stack so its just more heals.

Seconds, a lot of times people outside your main tank dont need to get crit healed for 4k life, a majority of your 860 mana is going to go to waste.

With proper NR, a druid can almost singlehandedly keep up a group in Huhu pre30% with HoTs.

Not using HoTs is a waste. They may heal for less per mana or second, but they are almost immune to being wasted due to overhealing, they stack with direct heals meaning more healing over all, and they have a lower overhead on your mana pool to use on people who dont need the big heals (rogues coming out to bandage from an AE, someone who took a cleave accidently, etc)

Flubber 07/03/06 11:50 AM

As stupid as this sounds...we still have tanks die all the time to ebonroc, firemaw, or flamegor right after the pull. People are afraid to pull aggro with a heal and shadowflame the raid, and oddly that happens quite often. Someone casts something right as the boss is moving into place, he rotates, and 30 people are suddenly at 10% health. We have the issue on Sartura at the pull as well, havent done Princess Huhuran yet, but perhaps the months of forced heal delays are causing your issues?

Its really just a case of your people needing to relearn to play if thats the case.

If the priests think its inefficient, thats just a mental lapse. With the raw amount of +healing gear ticking over the whole duration, you can have some amazing heal/mana nuumbers. I'd assume swiftmend would only make a druid want to use more HoT's :(

Nepthys 07/03/06 12:03 PM

Every priest and druid that I've known has at least one HoT going at any time. If anything, they are issues in the runs I have over whose renew gets to tick on whom (so no overwrites).

It's very mana-efficient after only a small amount of +heal, and it frees you to heal others faster. Druids with Swiftmend, especially.

Whitemane 07/03/06 12:05 PM

I use rejuvs when a lot of people need to get healed and are going to take some splash damage. If we're talking about healing an MT I rarely use rejuvenation or regrowth, it simply doesn't seem worth it to me. It's too costly and chances are it won't even heal for much.

Like I said, there are situations where HoT's are nice but I don't consider it a primary healing tool. Oh and all the issues you mentioned there have nothing to do with not using HoT's, more likely it's a case of stupid or slacking healers.

fivehundred 07/03/06 12:14 PM

I would love to use hots a lot more liberally than I do now. They are a fantastic tool and I think I can say with confidence my raid does not use them to their full potential. The problem, in my eyes, is when I put a hot on someone (other than the tank) the damage the HoT would heal is more often than not healed with a direct heal essentially making my HoT useless.

The argument surrounding overheal with HoT's I think is misunderstood. HoTs don't tick (AFAIK) if the target is at full health, so there is no "overheal penalty" on the healing chart. However, you still incur the mana penalty for essentially wasting a spell when someone comes in behind you and puts a direct heal on the person. (Or worse yet, overrides your HoT with one of their own).

If I'm in a situation where I know I'll be the only person healing my group, I'll use HoTs a LOT. However, outside of that circumstance, mine just kind of go to waste unless they are put on the MT. In order for me to feel comfortable using them to use them to their full potential (ie, mitigate consistent incidental damage -- aoe, cleave, etc) I would need to be in a situation where I'm the one primarily responsible for my group and have no expectation of assistance from other healers in the raid.

What do other healers out there think on the subject?

Whitemane 07/03/06 12:16 PM

You pretty much nailed it fivehundred.

Graham 07/03/06 12:24 PM

Real HoT use requires real healing assignment and the ability for you to trust other healers to not waste your mana and other healers trusting you enough to let you handle your assigned DPS classes.

Snowy 07/03/06 12:35 PM

HoT's effectiveness is inversely proprotional the the amount of overhealing going on. They are much stronger in smaller groups. Keep close track the next time you take 1.5k damage or so, and watch how many heals you get.

Less healers = HoT's better. More healers = HoT's usually are not very efficient at all.

james 07/03/06 1:05 PM

Well I tend to cover my party with HoTs just before stage 2 @ Huhuran but that's really to make the transition smoother (if I'm high on mana, you get a shield too). But here's the thing - casting an "instant cast" HoT takes 1.5s - mine gives you 133 HPS @ a situation like Huhuran - this is nice to supplement spammage but it doesn't replace it. If you're dying @ Huhu, maybe you need more NR? Maybe your healer is being silenced? Maybe, there's a special Olympics for healing in World of Warcraft and they're just not winning.

Good tactic for healing on Huhuran's stage 2 is to have 1 healer : 1 waller. You know who to blame! Awesome. As well as this, if you don't need healing, they're able to cross-heal other targets (i.e. use HoTs), esp. the MT or other NR wallers whose healer may be silenced.

For most bosses, we do have all HOTs permanently ticking on our MT - although it's usually the person with the most +heal we ask to do this.

Anias 07/03/06 1:52 PM

Hots are terrible hp/s, but decent mana efficiency if they tick for their full value. Many fights in wow are "do you have enough hp/s and can you maintain it without going oom", and you don't get every tick of the hot. They are really quite nice with hibernation/ZHC, and I use them alot when those buffs go off.

It's a nice incidental mitigation factor, and we tend to use them as such. Flattening the incoming damage spikes by having a trio of hot's ticking makes it easier to accomodate them while dealing with the occasional (I should really be running from that bug) moments.
It's also a very fast "toss this at that priest who's in the blizzard, go back to healing my tank" factor. As a druid, it's 1.5 seconds to toss off a rejuv. Sometimes that's all the time I can spare from my normal cycle on the people I'm supposed to be healing.

Aside on SM - I actually specced out of swiftmend, because I was running into the GC too much, and I couldn't use it to stretch my mana on fights where it mattered because I was healing with 4+ healers and not getting full use of my hots + SM. We definitely had too much SM going on =P I think we still have 2 druids with it atm, and I'm happy to apply the rejuvs so that they can mend them. (I'm 24/0/27 now)

Now in 5 mans? I use them alot. I also use rank 5? rejuv quite a bit since it's a crazy mana efficiency on splash damage, but it's definitely not my staple spell (hello HT, rank 3/4/7/11, wtb rank 0 HT off kel)

I would say that the real disincentive to Hot use is the Hp/s factor. It's pretty rare for it to be ok to leave someone low for 12 seconds while the hot tops them off. Think about c'thun or emps uppercuts, or anub'rekhan, etc. It's just hard to find 12-15 seconds of "waiting to be full health" in fights. So they're more useful as "this will blunt the beating" on MT's or people who are taking a steady damage input. Honestly, HOTS and Shield are overated. The number of "shield the tank after shadowflame" arguments I've seen convinced me that it's apparently very hard to look past "this is a shiny buff" and see "this is not enough HP/S to save us". (Either time your heals to land right after, topping him off by more than 1k, or shield before the flame, shielding after is for terribles )

I should probably be working, but trolling is more fun.

Flubber 07/03/06 2:01 PM

dont wanna derail it too bad...but:

Lightwell?

Personally I love it as itll let me(as a healer) replenish myself without wasting much mana.

Worthless for melee of course, but as far as its utility for the guys in the back? I just want some opinions on it.

My personal opinion is its good for 1/2 priests to have, just like Shadow-weaving. To be honest, I treat it alot like mana tide/Natures Swiftness. And since we make a habit not to heal other healers, its an efficient HoT.

Anias 07/03/06 2:09 PM

We view lightwell as a sign that you cannot analyze talent trees personally, but maybe there's some bizzaro application for it. =P There's so many good priest talents that I can't imagine finding room for LW without a specific fight in mind, and even then I have a hard time coming up with a rebuttal to "you could just bandage".

CrazyCarl 07/03/06 2:15 PM

Shielding AFTER SF is just kind of stupid, unless you're Alliance and don't have access to 8-10 Nature's Swiftness'.

Sheidling PRE-SF, now that's good stuff.

On topic: As for Renew, I tend to use it more on DPS (Especially Warlocks) and off-tanks than the MT. I obviously cast it on him, but it's not nearly as effective with everyone spamming heals, ideally keeping him near to, if not, topped off.

Spartacus 07/03/06 2:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anias
We view lightwell as a sign that you cannot analyze talent trees personally, but maybe there's some bizzaro application for it. =P There's so many good priest talents that I can't imagine finding room for LW without a specific fight in mind, and even then I have a hard time coming up with a rebuttal to "you could just bandage".

Loatheb


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 AM.

Forum Infrastructure by vBulletin 3.6.12 ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.