Elitist Jerks - Old JP system discussion thread

Elitist Jerks (http://elitistjerks.com/forums.php)

- Public Discussion (http://elitistjerks.com/f15/)

- - Old JP system discussion thread (http://elitistjerks.com/f15/t755-old_jp_system_discussion_thread/)

Closed. New thread and new discussion thread coming within moments so settle down there tex.

This is a pretty great system.. zero-sum wise. One of the more fair systems.

theres one huge problem though..

those fucking druids and their luck :(

Quote:

Originally Posted by Graham,March 22nd, 2005 @ 4:40pm

The important thing to realize about this system is that it is
zero-sum. That means that the total of all points in the system, both
positive and negative, is always zero. If you don't get economics
that may seem useless to you, but what it means is that the points
retain the same value over time, as there is no possibility for
inflation.

System, The Second
After each final boss kill in Strat/Scholo/UBRS/LBRS the raid leader takes a screenshot of the dead boss and the open raid window. This gets posted to a thread were some nice vollunteers give each of those persons a point in the instance JP database.

Something drops while it's FFA loot and multiple people want it: Roll normally.
Something drops while it's RR loot and multiple people want it: It's the RR's.
Something drops from a boss: Everyone who wants it rolls once. The losers may spend up to 5 JP to gain extra rolls. Once those are done, if there is a new winner, the original winner may spend up to 5 JP to roll 5 more times. Results then stand. Persons who lost get half their JP spent back, persons who won do not. The spending and results of rolls are included in the screenshot post by the raid leader.

Ah ok... To clarify the first system for some people, zero sum means that if you were to add all the points accumulated by everyone both positive and negative, it would come out to be 0 (zero). When one person loses a whole bunch of points everyone else very slightly gains some.

Question on the second part though. Do you round up or down on JP if someone used 3 JP rolls and still lost. What's half of 3 in that case?

Quote:

* 4-5 JPs used = 2 recycled
* 2-3 JPs used = 1 recycled
* 1 JP used = 0 recycled

Always down. For those of you mathematically inclined, spending two JP is the best option, three if you want a not-as-good-but-feels-better option.

Also, once you grasp the beauty of the zero point system all sorts of other nice things become avaliable. For instance, we give everyone on the raid Raid JP when a Firey Core, or Lava Core, or Core Leather drops. Then when someone in the guild uses them to have a guild crafter make the high-end thorium brotherhood stuff made, they pay back the Raid JP those items generated when they dropped. This gives us an easy manner of tracking and fairly allocating other items that can only come about from collective effort.

After you've spent a good ammount of time in instances you'll find yourself either spending 5 JP or none at all. The instance JP system really works well as a transition to what it's going to be like on the 40 man raids. It's far from perfect, but it's really good when you're only looking for an item or 2.

Although I've only spent 5 JP twice, and lost the item both times. Oh well, there's better things in MC where Im guaranteed something eventually.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pigz,March 22nd, 2005 @ 4:49pm

This is a pretty great system.. zero-sum wise. One of the more fair systems.

theres one huge problem though..

those fucking druids and their luck :(

Druid loot hasn't really dropped more than any other class loot. There's just less of us meaning more loot per person. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaubel,March 22nd, 2005 @ 5:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pigz,March 22nd, 2005 @ 4:49pm

This is a pretty great system.. zero-sum wise. One of the more fair systems.

theres one huge problem though..

those fucking druids and their luck :(

Druid loot hasn't really dropped more than any other class loot. There's just less of us meaning more loot per person. :)

I said that because of the example and because we've had quite a few druid drops in or raids. 3 in a day once I think. The next most have been priest drops. So far only 1 warrior drop and 0 rogue drops :(

Quote:

Originally Posted by Graham,March 22nd, 2005 @ 4:40pm

Magmadar dies and drops drood boots. These are valued at 125 points. They get disenchanted and Tony cries.

fixed for clarity

The zero-sum system is pretty cool, it's really a shame you didn't come up with that awesome of a system before the split.

Quote:

Originally Posted by digiwano,March 23rd, 2005 @ 7:08pm

The zero-sum system is pretty cool, it's really a shame you didn't come up with that awesome of a system before the split.

Actually, this is essentially what was proposed (albiet not fleshed out) first, and it the reaction it recieved is what started the road to the split.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Graham,March 23rd, 2005 @ 7:13pm

Actually, this is essentially what was proposed (albiet not fleshed out) first, and it the reaction it recieved is what started the road to the split.

Huh. I only ever remember reading/hearing about your second system.

Quote:

Originally Posted by digiwano,March 23rd, 2005 @ 7:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Graham,March 23rd, 2005 @ 7:13pm

Actually, this is essentially what was proposed (albiet not fleshed out) first, and it the reaction it recieved is what started the road to the split.

Huh. I only ever remember reading/hearing about your second system.

Then you must have missed it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Assassyn,March 23rd, 2005 @ 7:51pm

Then you must have missed it.

That's actually very likely, I was barely around when that part of the drama happened, and the time I did spend thinking about wow i spent in game playing.

I know that all of the complaining I saw was about the second system and not the first, though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by digiwano,March 23rd, 2005 @ 9:48pm

I know that all of the complaining I saw was about the second system and not the first, though.

Let's not rehash it. The second system was a compromise because the first was so ill-received.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Graham,March 23rd, 2005 @ 9:50pm

Let's not rehash it.

No, I agree with that.

It's really too bad that there couldn't have been a better agreement for the points system, because I do think it could have been worked out well.