|
Originally Posted by Michad
Gurg in your estimation do you think the 4H encounter is properly balanced for what most would consider a standard 40 man raiding group?
|
I'm really not the one to ask because we haven't killed them. But yes, I think the 4H are remarkable in that it proves that Blizzard can design a killable boss with a weeks-long learning curve. Every other boss in the game has either died relatively quickly, to someone, or has proven to be unbeatable.
Edit: There's an interview at worldofraids.com with Nihilum's raid leader (I think?) and he says that he thinks Sapphiron is harder than 4H, but 4H have a much tougher learning curve. The Four Horsemen are pretty much as complex a fight as Blizzard has ever designed, and the fact that it is possible to plausibly debate the merits of a dozen different strategies at length suggests as much. I'm sure that once someone releases a video and the world can see that, ok, this strat will work for sure, you'll see them die much faster. One of the hardest part of the 4H is arriving at a strat that really works. It can be deceptive -- sometimes you think you just need to improve your execution more and it'll be fine, or that you just got really unlucky, when actually the underlying strat is wrong. That's part of what makes the learning curve so steep -- and they are really unforgiving so most screwups will rapidly result in a wipe.