 |
09/28/06, 7:06 PM
|
#31
|
|
Glass Joe
Murloc Hunter
Terrordar (EU)
|
|
Originally Posted by malthrin
Anyway, what would you prefer as a hunter-specific mechanic? It's hard to see what else they could add, beyond a kiting scenario where a Hunter is clearly optimal.
|
Pet tanking: "Rawr, you're not a pet! I'm looking for a pet!" ;)
|
|
|
|
|
09/28/06, 7:12 PM
|
#32
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
What rotation system do you guys use when you don't have enough hunters for 2 per shot?
1) Rotation of 2 or 3 people (depending on boss) with someone stepping in on misses/failures.
2) Rotation of all hunters with the next person moving forward on a miss/failure.
Im predominantly using 1 but 2 may be simpler to keep track of. Oh, and we had 2 failures (not misses) on huhu last night. Before then I'd only seen a failure once and that was a few months ago on Chrom.
|
|
|
|
|
09/28/06, 7:24 PM
|
#33
|
|
King Hippo
|
If you have to use 2 hunters per shot, you need to get your hunters more +hit gear.
Since I've got 9% hit a good long while ago I've never missed a tranq. I've also never seen a failed tranq but I've heard its linked to two hunters getting off a tranq nearly at the same time. First one takes effect, second ones fails. I would guess if you see misses on specific mobs after getting to 9%, that particular mob has its defense score artificially boosted. Might wanna keep a dire maul +hit ring bagged (if you have at least 1 crit ring) for these situations.
As far as getting tranq shots off timely, as people have said, your hunters need to stand as close as they can while avoiding effects. The travel time makes a big difference. I also suggest Natur Enemy Cast Bars, it has a suprisingly accurate frenzy timer for encounters where its needed. Keep an eye on that bar, don't start an aimed shot that will not allow you to take your shot and spam your tranq button as it nears the end.
|
|
|
|
09/28/06, 7:27 PM
|
#34
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
Huhu, I downgrade my NR until I have enough +Hit. Even then, I stand around 200+ Buffed as a primary soak. The more you do resistance fights, the less resistance you need, IMO, with more efficient (experience wise, not necessarily gear) healing/dps. Typically, we have 3 Hunters. The extra either spams after our Channel Message, so the most we would wait is 1-2 seconds, or when we scream maniacally on vent for him. The only fight I haven't done is Gluth so I can't comment there.
Flamegor, we've had the #3 Tranq misses, so you have to wait a splitsecond for a cooldown maybe and then the Tranq order just has to re-adjust itself.
Chromag, we always have a spare tranq if there's a prolonged stun or mispositioned timelapse.
Huhu, #3 always does a backup tranq after each msg.
Flamegor is one of the better fights to tell if a hunter isn't tranqing quickly based on the novas, then I just tell them to spam and it doesn't happen again.
|
|
|
|
|
09/28/06, 7:34 PM
|
#35
|
|
Bald Bull
Orc Death Knight
Whisperwind
|
|
Originally Posted by Glaurong
I've also never seen a failed tranq but I've heard its linked to two hunters getting off a tranq nearly at the same time. First one takes effect, second ones fails.
|
No. I've had my tranq fail using STranq 2 and I was the only one with tranq cooling down.
BTW for the person saying STranq needed to be synced, that's just bizarre crazytalk. STranq 1 was completely unautomated and STranq2 has always used a hidden channel to communicate. You don't need to be near other hunters to get the info. You don't even have to be in the same zone.
|
|
|
|
|
09/28/06, 7:46 PM
|
#36
|
|
Piston Honda
Night Elf Druid
Aszune (EU)
|
|
Originally Posted by Branar
Broodlord was another kill that, when it was introduced, was very hunter friendly without being gimmicky, kite-oriented, or even pet-oriented. Feign Death and agro reduction were king. Of course, raiding agro has changed a lot since then with shield slam being improved and gear changing, so now it's probably not something you can consider a "hunter" fight anymore.
|
It was never a hunter fight. When broodlord first came out, aggro ceilings were not understood very well, so it was assumed that "slow dps = win". As soon as dps ceilings were understood fully, then people realized that if you could just nuke the shit out of it as long as it died in sub-5mins.
So the only reason hunters did well at the start was becuase we didn't fully understand the aggro mechanics. It's not becuase of new superior aggro due to shield slam or whatever.
I can think of exactly 1 mob that hunters have this perceived aggro advantage on, and that's gluth before the first decimate. The breakthroughs we made in understanding aggro mechanics is what phased out the "aggro-free dps" advantage we supposedly had, it had nothing to do with shieldslam or thunderfury or whatever.
|
|
|
|
|
09/28/06, 8:10 PM
|
#37
|
|
Von Kaiser
Murloc Hunter
Azjol-Nerub
|
|
Originally Posted by Nasq
|
Originally Posted by malthrin
Anyway, what would you prefer as a hunter-specific mechanic? It's hard to see what else they could add, beyond a kiting scenario where a Hunter is clearly optimal.
|
Pet tanking: "Rawr, you're not a pet! I'm looking for a pet!" ;)
|
A more subtle way to do it would be to give the boss abilities that don't affect pets. More specifically, abilities that don't affect Beasts, but are destructive to humanoids. Chain-knockbacks, disarms, there's a lot of options here, many of which would also make fights more friendly for druid tanking.
|
|
|
|
|
09/28/06, 8:14 PM
|
#38
|
|
Soda Popinski
|
Patchwerk's Hateful Strike will not hit a pet, even if it is the only target in melee range. So it is theoretically possible for a pet to tank a mob like Patchwerk while the raid burns it down with ranged DPS. Obviously, if that were the only way to beat Patchwerk it wouldn't be a well-designed encounter, it's just something to think about.
|
If you aren't a goblin, why not?
If you are a goblin you rule
|
|
|
09/28/06, 8:24 PM
|
#39
|
|
Great Tiger
|

|
Originally Posted by dojke
|
Originally Posted by Branar
Broodlord was another kill that, when it was introduced, was very hunter friendly without being gimmicky, kite-oriented, or even pet-oriented. Feign Death and agro reduction were king. Of course, raiding agro has changed a lot since then with shield slam being improved and gear changing, so now it's probably not something you can consider a "hunter" fight anymore.
|
It was never a hunter fight. When broodlord first came out, aggro ceilings were not understood very well, so it was assumed that "slow dps = win". As soon as dps ceilings were understood fully, then people realized that if you could just nuke the shit out of it as long as it died in sub-5mins.
So the only reason hunters did well at the start was becuase we didn't fully understand the aggro mechanics. It's not becuase of new superior aggro due to shield slam or whatever.
I can think of exactly 1 mob that hunters have this perceived aggro advantage on, and that's gluth before the first decimate. The breakthroughs we made in understanding aggro mechanics is what phased out the "aggro-free dps" advantage we supposedly had, it had nothing to do with shieldslam or thunderfury or whatever.
|
Are you kidding?
Original Broodlord resisted 9/10 FD's and had a 100% aggro wipe; as a hunter you were doing like 20 dps because you couldn't ditch aggro and everyone near him was constantly losing it.
I always thought hunters had a good idea of the aggro ceiling on that fight since it was so aggro touchy, and just about all of our wipes were mage/warlock caused.
As far as hunters not understanding the aggro ceiling I don't agree with that at all.
|
|
|
|
|
09/28/06, 8:33 PM
|
#40
|
|
Bald Bull
Orc Death Knight
Whisperwind
|
|
Originally Posted by Steelfleece
Patchwerk's Hateful Strike will not hit a pet, even if it is the only target in melee range. So it is theoretically possible for a pet to tank a mob like Patchwerk while the raid burns it down with ranged DPS. Obviously, if that were the only way to beat Patchwerk it wouldn't be a well-designed encounter, it's just something to think about.
|
Heh. Yeah, if pets had twice their current hitpoints and armor. Good point, though.
There's all kinds of things they can do to give pets, and thus hunters (and possibly feral tanks depending on what they do), more of a role in raids.
The problem I have with Tranq Shot is that it is forced raid utility. Compare that to fights like Nefarion and Fankriss, where Mages and Warlocks have raid utility through powerful AOE abilities, or fights like Sartura and C'Thun where Rogues and Paladins have raid utility through stuns. One (tranq) is an absolute, artificial requirement that forces you to bring X number of Y class to the raid or you fail. The other (aoe, stun, etc) is an implied utility role that makes the fight easier, but doesn't prevent you from winning if you don't have the required-by-design number of a certain class.
That's why I want to see things where Hunters make a fight noticeably easier, but lack of Hunters doesn't make it impossible. Even in my knockback-spam example, it'd be possible for warriors/feral druids to Spider Boss the adds if there weren't too many of them. Hunter pets would be the ideal solution, but not the only solution.
|
|
|
|
|
09/28/06, 8:48 PM
|
#41
|
|
Piston Honda
Night Elf Druid
Aszune (EU)
|
|
Originally Posted by LadyVex
Are you kidding?
Original Broodlord resisted 9/10 FD's and had a 100% aggro wipe; as a hunter you were doing like 20 dps because you couldn't ditch aggro and everyone near him was constantly losing it.
|
Ok maybe my wording was wrong. I didn't mean "the week bwl was totally fucked up", but when you could kill him by something other than kiting him to vael's room.
|
I always thought hunters had a good idea of the aggro ceiling on that fight since it was so aggro touchy, and just about all of our wipes were mage/warlock caused.
|
When people were first doing bwl, the prevailng strategy for broodlord was to do slow dps. Fights would take 8-14 minutes, and casters (and even healers) would be overaggoring somewhere around the 7 minute mark. Becuase we did not understand the aggro ceiling, we thought there was an aggro problem and slowed dps on the casters. Hunters shined clearly there, beause they didn't have to slow dps for this strat, becuase of fd. In summary, if you kill broodlord in 11 minutes, your dmgmeters will look something where hunters did twice as much dmg as anyone else.
Now that we understand how broodlord aggro works, we simply burn the shit out of it, and it dies in 3mins 45seconds. This is not because of shield slam, or any other aggro mechanic change. It's because a mage can do 75k dmg in 4mins without overaggoring since we changed the tankstrat (the ceiling is directly affected by number of tanks you have tanking), whereas before you couldn't do 75k in 11mins.
Nothing mechanically changed, nothing was 'taken' from hunters, which was a previous posters contention. It's just simply as we (i mean the community, not hunters in particular) started to better understand how bwl fights work, and that in fact none of them were shaky-aggro mobs that we all initially thought they were. (Excepting the bugged conflag, when you could one-tank razor).
|
As far as hunters not understanding the aggro ceiling I don't agree with that at all.
|
I'm not saying the hunters did or didn't understand the aggro ceiling in particular, I'm saying that no one at all understood it.
|
|
|
|
|
09/28/06, 9:10 PM
|
#42
|
|
Von Kaiser
Human Priest
Burning Blade
|
For tranqing on Huhu you can wear your normal gear with +9% hit for the first 60% then switch to your NR gear via FD. Just need to time it so you have at least two shots at FDing in case you resist one.
|
|
|
|
|
09/28/06, 9:20 PM
|
#43
|
|
Soda Popinski
|
|
Originally Posted by LadyVex
Are you kidding?
Original Broodlord resisted 9/10 FD's and had a 100% aggro wipe; as a hunter you were doing like 20 dps because you couldn't ditch aggro and everyone near him was constantly losing it.
I always thought hunters had a good idea of the aggro ceiling on that fight since it was so aggro touchy, and just about all of our wipes were mage/warlock caused.
As far as hunters not understanding the aggro ceiling I don't agree with that at all.
|
*facepalm*
Broodlord did not and does not resist feign death more than any other level 63 mob. That's just something you were imagining. Please don't say things like that. No boss mob resists feign death more than another boss mob, though fights with adds are harder to feign in(read: Gluth) because you have to make a resist check against all the nearby adds.
As for the other posts on Broodlord, while that may be true for an Alliance guild, for the Horde with no BoS or Tranquil Air, it was not possible for mages and warlocks to go all out on Broodlord at any point or they WOULD pull aggro. The aggro ceiling was an issue, but DPS had to be relatively slow still because there was so little -threat for us at the time. Keep in mind we are talking about Broodlord when his knock-away was a 100% deaggro, not today's Broodlord which merely has a 50% deaggro Knock Away. Hunters shined because they could drop all aggro in the blink of an eye--I remember our first Broodlord kill had something like 7/8 hunters(or was it 9? it was silly). After a couple of feigns, hunters could go all out and top DPS charts easily while a mage doing more than half the damage of the hunter would pull aggro three minutes into the fight. It wasn't exactly a fun mechanic, though it WAS beatable with a balanced group(we downed him with a fairly balanced group the next week, still full-aggro wipe knockback).
|
If you aren't a goblin, why not?
If you are a goblin you rule
|
|
|
09/28/06, 9:23 PM
|
#44
|
|
Don Flamenco
Blood Elf Hunter
Kil'Jaeden
|
Mages also had no real -aggro talents bar arcane missles.
|
|
|
|
|
09/28/06, 9:39 PM
|
#45
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
|
Originally Posted by Steelfleece
|
Originally Posted by LadyVex
Are you kidding?
Original Broodlord resisted 9/10 FD's and had a 100% aggro wipe; as a hunter you were doing like 20 dps because you couldn't ditch aggro and everyone near him was constantly losing it.
|
*facepalm*
Broodlord did not and does not resist feign death more than any other level 63 mob. That's just something you were imagining. Please don't say things like that. No boss mob resists feign death more than another boss mob, though fights with adds are harder to feign in(read: Gluth) because you have to make a resist check against all the nearby adds.
|
'Bloodlord' resists feign 9/10 if you stand in front of the gate leading to the rest of the zone. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|