Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Public Discussion » Public Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10/22/06, 7:36 PM   #1
know1
Von Kaiser
 
Murloc Shaman
 
Jubei'Thos
I know there's other threads about TBC and Healing downranking info, but this didn't seem to fit those.
I also haven't had a chance to play the Beta so was hoping some people who had could answer a few questions.

I've been reading some forum posts about the new ivalue of sta being basically double, so I also went looking at thottbot and checking the new ranks of spells available at 70.

I came up with this table:
Current:		        Max @ 70:
HW (10) - 1620-1850	 HW (12) - 2134-2436
LHW (6) - 832-928	   LHW (7) - 1039-1185
CH (3) - 551-629	    CH (5) - 826-942

%Increase:
HW - 31.7%
LHW - 24.9%-27.7% (difference between min and max? Someone want to check the numbers?)
CH - 49.8%

HW: 694 HP/s		    914 HP/s
LHW: 586.7 HP/s		 741.3 HP/s
CH: 236 HP/s		    353.6 HP/s
Cast times remain unchanged therefore HP/s scales linerally with increased heals.
Currently our MTs run about 6.5HP unbuffed. I'm hearing numbers in TBC for MTs @ 70 of around 16k unbuffed (pure theory I know but not far off the mark given current knowledge).

So at the moment my max heals hit for ~28% of a tank's health, in TBC that'll be ~15%.
Also currently, assuming ideal conditions it takes about 9.4s to heal a tank from zero to full, in TBC that'll be 17.5s (nearly 100% increase)

Also in 40 mans you had 13-15 healers usually, in TBC with 25 man raids I'd assume 8-9 or so healers. This further gimps your ability to convert mana quickly into tank HPs.

So I'm wondering this.
What are raid fights going to look like in TBC?
I'd suspect a LOT less spike damage (where the tank's health can be one shot to less than 50% of total), given the reduced ability to heal through it. Or if a mob does have this sort of ability it'll be on >10s cooldown or something. This means no more patchwerk like fights.

Also I'd hope lots more fights that aren't pure tank and spank, so multiple tanks and mobile stuff (as much as I hate mobile stuff with totems). This means having 3-4 dedicated healers per tank is going to be out the window.

With HoTs now going to stack is direct healing a lots less useful? Potentially gimping healers without HoTs?

I know nobody has really seen the raid content yet, but perhaps someone with Alpha/Beta could maybe give us an idea based upon 5 man stuff.

Also I've only crunched the number for a Shaman, as this is my most played toon, but from what I see looking at thott's beta spells. For Priests, Druids and Pallys the HP healed % increase is about the same for all classes.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/06, 7:56 PM   #2
Fluster
Von Kaiser
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Xavius (EU)
16k Unbuffed sounds extreme. Do you have any backup or info on the numbers?

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/06, 8:07 PM   #3
Cesar2000
Don Flamenco
 
Cesar2000's Avatar
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Dragonblight (EU)
Tanks will not have 16k unbuffed.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/06, 8:17 PM   #4
Xard
Piston Honda
 
Dwarf Warrior
 
Frostmane
I think it'll be a lot more based on endurance, and still USING lower ranks without lower ranks being the only way to do it. A lot more fights similar to the twin emps where its going to last a while and you need to think ahead, rather than a fight where its pure healing power. Stacking HoTs along means that you could push an absurd amount of HPS on any one target, but whether thats the smartest use of everyones mana will remain to be seen. If a fight lasts 3 minutes and just is like a huge power healing situation (similar to patchwerk) then it will be trivial just because hots will have such a huge effect. However in a situation where you have to fight for a while without rest there will be a lot more focus on using mana smarter (and unfortunately maybe using a lot of pots) it wouldn't be super effective to stack up one player with HoTs because some of that healing will be inevitably wasted.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/06, 8:24 PM   #5
mylek
Von Kaiser
 
mylek's Avatar
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Mal'Ganis
Taking a top geared tank right now and doubling the +stamina from items would put them at 12k unbuffed. Adding in prot talents and commanding shout would give them another 1k self buffed putting them at 13k.

Now guessing as to the hp gained going from L60>L70 (~1.5k) and the extra staminia on items going from ilvl ~90 ->~110 (~1.2k). This would put a warrior with tanking gear at around 15.7k health self buffed.

16k seems possible to me. The real question is whether they will allocate stamina on tanking gear as agressively as they have been in the past.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/06, 8:29 PM   #6
know1
Von Kaiser
 
Murloc Shaman
 
Jubei'Thos
Had a quick hunt to try and find the thread I read about tanks with 16k HP, and can't find anything yet.
I also can't remember if it was on EJ's forums or official or somewhere else entirely.

Maybe that's another question then, how reliable a number is 16k (I remember a whole load of maths using beta mined gear to back it up).

Given ~30% increase in healing ability using lvl 70 rank spells, I'd say a 6.5k unbuffed tank @lvl60 should be running ~8.5k unbuffed @lvl70 to scale the same.
Is this consistent with what people are seeing in Beta?

Edit: OK given the above then it looks like Tank's HPs will far outscale the raw healing ability increases (whether it's 12k or 16k is another debate).

So it looks like more endurance fights, how does this fit with Blizzard saying they are going to have shorter dungeons only taking 1-2 hours to complete? Does this only apply to 5 mans? Does this mean 2-3 bosses per dungeon (or wing thereof), with little trash, and boss fights that can last upto 30 mins?

Just trying to get a feel for what sort of things I should be aiming for, stacking more regen gear, or focussing on more +heal? Or should I just ignore everything and worry about it when the time comes?

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/06, 9:11 PM   #7
Mosh
Don Flamenco
 
Undead Warlock
 
Al'Akir (EU)
They don't need to make fights last 30 minutes for them to be about endurance. If the boss does enough DPS and downranking is sufficiently ineffective, you're forced to spam high rank spells back to back, and no matter how much Naxx gear you have, you can't chain max rank LHW for more than a couple minutes.

Edit: For clarity, I define 'endurance' as anything where healers going OOM is an issue, and 'non-endurance' as anything where the tank has a realistic chance of dying while healers have plenty of mana, or where mana at least isn't a central part of the fight.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/06, 9:41 PM   #8
Lord BEEF
Soda Popinski
 
Lord BEEF's Avatar
 
Tauren Druid
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by know1
So it looks like more endurance fights, how does this fit with Blizzard saying they are going to have shorter dungeons only taking 1-2 hours to complete? Does this only apply to 5 mans? Does this mean 2-3 bosses per dungeon (or wing thereof), with little trash, and boss fights that can last upto 30 mins?
The boss fights won't actually last significantly longer I don't think. Healers can burn through their mana much faster. The duration is completely decided by blizzard and how much health and damage they want to give the bosses. Low health and high damage equals short fights, and high health with lower damage means longer fights.

If I were to guess, we're just less likely to see fights like twin emporors where it's 10+ minutes of healing against spike damage since we just won't have the mana for it

Check out my friend's bitchin' Lord of the Rings Art

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/06, 10:43 PM   #9
Soul
Don Flamenco
 
Undead Mage
 
Gilneas
Hmm... if the changes to healing ranks and Decursive go through, then it might be nigh impossible to do some encounters after the TBC patch, regardless of whether you get the expansion immediately or not, at least at level 60. I wonder whether they'll take any steps at all to ensure that, say, Twin Emps or Chromaggus are doable at 60 come expansion day.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/06, 11:05 PM   #10
krucifix85
Don Flamenco
 
Human Warlock
 
Barthilas
Something like Chromm is doable without Decursive. More specific group setup's and positioning, and it really shouldn't be a problem

I think something like the Twin Emps would also be doable, with Healer rotations.
If you are using higher ranks of Spells, less people can be used to heal, meaning the other healers can wait and regen to spirit. (

I think this is how it was hoped these encounters were completed, and with the hard crackdown on these two features (downranking and decursive) i think we can look forward to more encounters stylised like the above.

http://ctprofiles.net/13134

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/06, 11:06 PM   #11
know1
Von Kaiser
 
Murloc Shaman
 
Jubei'Thos
Originally Posted by Mosh
They don't need to make fights last 30 minutes for them to be about endurance. If the boss does enough DPS and downranking is sufficiently ineffective, you're forced to spam high rank spells back to back, and no matter how much Naxx gear you have, you can't chain max rank LHW for more than a couple minutes.

Edit: For clarity, I define 'endurance' as anything where healers going OOM is an issue, and 'non-endurance' as anything where the tank has a realistic chance of dying while healers have plenty of mana, or where mana at least isn't a central part of the fight.
I guess this is where my curiosity comes in.

They can't make the spike damage coming in to much, due to the numbers making it impossible to heal through, and so if it's going to be the sort of fight I have to back to back 2k direct heals (950 HP/s), then stacking HoTs are going to make this sort of thing trivial. This also means in a min/max world you're going to want to bring healers with HoTs rather than Shamans and Pallies (Don't think pallies have a HoT).

I guess I just can't conceptualize how they're going to come up with challenging encounters giving the healing mechanics they're talking about in TBC. Unless somehow they make fights that make HoTs irrelevnat somehow.

On paper, it looks like one of two ways, healers are either going to have a bloody hard time, or healers will be next to irrelvant given tanks and melee classes high HP. Also with consumables like the outland bandages healing 6500 over 8 seconds, that's about the best HP/s in the game.

You're always going to take healers, but is it going to be a case of 3-4 healers doing patch healing just to top everyone up, or are you going to require half a raid of healers to dump mana into keeping your tanks up?

Or are you going to have a lot more flexibility?
Being able to take a raid heavy on dps and burn bosses down before they do significant amounts of damage to kill your raid, or take a healer heavy raid to the same boss and wear him down over a longer period?

Just thoughts.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/06, 11:30 PM   #12
Cryect
Bald Bull
 
Night Elf Druid
 
Stormreaver
Originally Posted by Soul
Hmm... if the changes to healing ranks and Decursive go through, then it might be nigh impossible to do some encounters after the TBC patch, regardless of whether you get the expansion immediately or not, at least at level 60. I wonder whether they'll take any steps at all to ensure that, say, Twin Emps or Chromaggus are doable at 60 come expansion day.
Uh Twin Emps will definately be doable... its a joke of a fight for a raid in Tier 3
and Chromaggus is easily doable...

The only fight I would be worried about after the expansion is Sapphiron since I use rank 4 HT that entire fight and its the most crucial fight in the world that eveyrone is decursed in under 2 seconds.

I need to do something useless.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/06, 11:58 PM   #13
Zurai
Bald Bull
 
Orc Death Knight
 
Whisperwind
Like was mentioned, 16k unbuffed should be reachable by tanks. It won't be easy - probably require Tier BC-2 or 3 level equipment - but a doubling of base stamina seems like it will be reachable given the stamina itemization changes. On top of that, even as a hunter I was gaining 200+ base hit points every level past 60 (which is saying something - my naked unbuffed health is 2800). So figure a warrior will get at least 250; that's +2500 health right there. Double stam from 6.5k gives us ~11k probably; that puts us at 13.5k without even really thinking about anything but gear and base health.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/23/06, 12:02 AM   #14
Felippe
King Hippo
 
Tauren Warrior
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by mylek
16k seems possible to me. The real question is whether they will allocate stamina on tanking gear as agressively as they have been in the past.
There's a blue leg piece on the thottbot beta site that has ~64 stamina and defense rating IIRC. The highest piece of Dreadnaught, the helmet, has 45 stamina. Granted they are two different item slots, and thus the item budget is different, but you can already get an idea of the amount of stamina we'll be seeing on items.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Old 10/23/06, 12:08 AM   #15
Zurai
Bald Bull
 
Orc Death Knight
 
Whisperwind
Actually head and legs are both the same item budget, so they're a valid direct comparison.

Offline
Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Public Discussion » Public Discussion

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Paladin healing in 2.1, theorycraft Morthis Class Mechanics 202 05/16/07 7:55 PM
Theorycraft Teenee User Interface and AddOns 3 03/05/07 11:40 AM
Spiritual Healing - + Healing multiplied? Xaviar Public Discussion 8 08/13/06 6:53 PM
Inflation Based DKP System Loerna Public Discussion 49 06/08/06 2:55 PM