Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Public Discussion » Public Discussion

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12/26/06, 5:48 PM   #31
Zurai
Bald Bull
 
Orc Death Knight
 
Whisperwind
Another consideration that a lot of people won't realize: Beastmaster specced Hunter pets get at least as much of a benefit (in raw DPS terms) from the melee group layouts seen here as rogues do, plus the hunter gets some minimal benefit as well and provides a 3% damage buff to the whole party. I think that war + sham + hunt + feral + x will be an ideal group, as long as the hunter is bm specced. MM specced hunters would probably be best in a mixed group.

Offline
Old 12/26/06, 5:59 PM   #32
skipdog
Glass Joe
 
Worgen Priest
 
Cenarion Circle
I feel like this entire discussion hinges on a key question:

Will our raids be in need of more Healing or more Damage in TBC?

It just seems that about all of the decisions are based around "do we want a healer being less effective to give DPS a larger boost?"

Currently, I would say damage is the most important. Coming into almost every fight, we were rarely limited by our healers gear and their mana pool(consumeables always fixed that anyways). All the fights that we read about that we thought would be extremly "taxing" on our healers, always turned out to be no problem. DPS always saves everybody time, and reduces the amount of time that everybody has to execute their job.

United States Offline
Old 12/26/06, 6:40 PM   #33
• Snowy
Mitt Romney?
 
Snowy's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Priest
 
Mal'Ganis
With the reduction to 25 mans, group composition will be much more dependent on what you run with -- the difference between running with 9 or 11 healers out of 25 is much greater than the difference between running with 13 or 15 out of 40.

Generally speaking I see there being a MT group (of course), 2 DPS groups and 2 caster groups. Your hybrids will fall into those groups as their talents dictate. Shamans and Paladins will fill out the auras/totems where they are most needed. I would priortize DPS buffs over anything else, with the exception of one shadow priest for a caster group -- i.e. I would be getting those shamans in the DPS groups for totems. Imp LOTP would be in a DPS group -- not so much for the self healing (which is very nice of course) but the added crit is a very nice bonus.

The shadow priest would probably be the one switching between the caster groups as needed. If it's taxing on the healing, then I would place the spriest there to be a mana battery for the healers. Otherwise, with the warlocks and lucky mages.

Going any further in depth on this is again, quite specific on exactly what you're bringing to your particular 25 man group. I think the theory I would continue to stick with is "DPS is king" though.

United States Offline
Old 12/26/06, 6:46 PM   #34
♦ Praetorian
Mike Tyson
 
Praetorian's Avatar
 
Orc Shaman
 
Mal'Ganis
Nope, really nothing productive here.

Basically this is like asking "what is the best class"? It's a meaningless discussion without specific parameters, and we lack all those parameters. Anyone who reads this board hopefully knows that a shadow priest should go in a group with mana users and that a LotP druid would do better with melee than in a group of mages. Beyond that, group composition will depend on the specific scenarios, as it always has.

Offline
Closed Thread

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Public Discussion » Public Discussion

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Raid group compositions/make up Ailee Public Discussion 4 07/06/07 2:46 AM
Group abilities in Raid environment CasT Class Mechanics 10 05/04/07 12:36 PM
Raid group optimization. Whiteknight Public Discussion 2 09/07/06 5:43 PM