 |
| Welcome to Elitist Jerks |
We're testing some new features on the site regarding OpenID registration and coordination with gamerDNA. If you experience any issues with registering an account, please take the time to fill out a report and send it to this e-mail address. We would appreciate any assistance you could provide in making sure everything is functioning as intended. Thanks!
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ and the forum rules. Users must register to post and new registrations are subject to a one day "mute" period to get acquainted with the community.
|
01/02/07, 4:55 AM
|
#1
|
|
Mailbox Dancer
Undead Priest
Kil'Jaeden (EU)
|
Traditionally MMORPG boards discuss hard, quantifiable facts regarding game mechanics. This board is certainly an extreme (and also good) example of this prevalent tendency within the gaming community, but on a lower level you will also find it in "less sophisticated" communities like the WoW General Forums. I find it intriguing, because obviously a lot of players base their decision making to a large degree not only on "theory craftable" factors but also on the less tangible effects like aesthetics and their respective cultural background.
While it is understandable to prioritize the discussion on quantifiable factors, as they are more open to analysis and therefore allow to reach a rationale common ground, ignorance of the aforementioned soft factors may as much lead to bad design desicions as balancing issues in gameplay.
Let's examine now the influence of soft factors on two major WoW issues. Faction and race imbalance as well as reception of raid content (and dungeon popularity in general).
Faction and Race imbalance:
It is obvious that Alliance outnumbers Horde on most servers to some significant degree. Infact the disparity is so large that it leads to several unpleasant balancing issues: small raiding community on Horde side, BG queues for Alliance, difficulties in implementing open PvP content, more limited economy on Horde side.
The reasons for this have almost nothing to do with hard facts on conscious and rationale race and therefore faction choices. The forum whining over WoTF alone should imply that at least half of the WoW player population should chose Undead as the race of their choice. There are other underlying issues at work: perceived physical attractiveness and "tolkienization". The Alliance has not only received all the sexy or cute races but is designed with the "Tolkien Fantasy Standard" in mind. Humans, Elves, Dwarfs. The only exception are the Gnomes and their "steampunk" culture. Interestingly enough this steampunk element received quite a much of critisism from the more conservative fantasy players during beta and after release. The same thing that happens now with TBC and the Sci-Fi elements of the Netherstorm area. "Tolkien Fantasy Standard" is a strong and imho unfortunate force in the western hemisphere when it comes to game design. My own desicion for chosing Horde has been greatly influenced by my idiosyncrasy for the tolkienization of the fantasy genre.
The physical attractivness of the Alliance races makes things only worse. Everything about NE females screams of sexual innuendo and Horde had nothing to compete with this.
In short Sex and Tolkien define the faction imbalance. Blizzard basically admitted to it by designing Bloodelfs with this in mind. Horde now gets a Tolkien Race (Elves) with more than their share of sexuality. Expect Horde/Alliance imbalance be thing of the past in a few months.
Recepetion of Raid and Dungeon Content:
While the faction and race imbalance has received quite some coverage in forum discussions, the popularity of instances is almost never discussed in aesthetic terms, yet I would blame the "AQ sucks" sentiment on this very element.
A quick summary raid instance aesthetics:
MC: After the very first impression of sheer size and dimension when you first enter it ("omg, this place is huge") you realize that is basically a blown up version of Ragefire Chasm. You get aesthetically sick of it after your third run or so.
BWL: Huge aesthtical improvement. The rotating blood cylinders, the dragons chained to the roof, the nef balcony. A very nicely designed instance. Everyone I know loves BWL design.
ZG: Also big hit with the players. Incerdibly detailed instance that transports the vodoo flavor of the whole place very well. Has best "feel" of all the raiding instances, imho.
AQ20 and AQ40: Both are a step backwards from ZG and BWL. AQ20 isn't that bad designed but it can't hold a candle to ZG when ist comes to the little details and AQ40 is an aesthically on almost the same level as MC. Basically just a string of caves.
Naxx: Great work as every wings feels different and so the designs doesn't get boring. Together with ZG the best designed raiding instance (Since I haven't made much progression inside Naxx, I'm a bit careful on evaluating this place).
Let's concentrate on AQ40:
Most people dislike the place. Why? It has quite interesting encounters, trash is annoying yes, but this is also the case with MC, BWL and Naxx, itemization is partly to blame, but only when you are a primary healer or tank. For DPS it has very nice upgrades and yet also a lot of DPS players dislike the instance.
Flame me, but I would blame the AQ failure mostly on the bland graphical design of this place. Would it be on par with say BWL (not to speak about Naxx or ZG), I guess it would be much more popular than it is now.
So here we are: soft factors decide about major balancing issues as well as the reception of major PvE content, yet are seemingly absent in the discussion.
With TBC on the horizon, what would you guess are the next instances that will be a hit like ZG or failures like AQ? Has Blizzard learnt from it's mistakes or are there still dull and uninspring dungeons out there (on raid and 5 man level)? Are there other "soft" concerns you may haver regarding future gaming experience ?
And most important of all: Will you reroll for a sexy BE female? C'mon you can admit to it ;) (In fact I know quite a few players who will reroll their old class on a BE char).
|
I'm not an addict ... maybe that's a lie.
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 5:21 AM
|
#2
|
|
Mostly Harmless.
Citania
Undead Warlock
No WoW Account
|
I'm going to focus on one single point of your post - AQ40. While I don't deny that AQ40 as a whole looks merely average (though Sartura's room and its colorfulness is actually pretty good IMO), I'm willing to say that the majority of people who hate AQ40 and have actually ran it consistently hates it for the questionable encounter design, and not the possibly-questionable artistic design.
As for the annoyance of the trash... how far in AQ40 have you gone? Honestly, I don't know how anyone who's done the pre-C'Thun trash on a regular basis can even contemplate say that the "annoying without merit" factor for MC, BWL, or even Naxx (which has a few quite-annoying trash of its own) trash can compare to that of the trash packs after Twin Emps.
Personally, I don't think AQ40 is a failure. And any shortcomings with the instance is definitely not because it looks bad - it's questionable design decisions and itemization: the difficulty level of the encounters and the loot ranges from MC-level to Naxx-level, which is not a bad idea but not very well implemented, and the T2.5 gear is only mildly attractive. And even though some of the fights (C'Thun in particular) is absolutely fantastic in terms of design, there is a great amount of tediousness which does a great deal to dampen the fights' appeal (once again, C'Thun in particular).
|
"You live and learn. At any rate, you live."
~Douglas Adams (RIP)
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 5:36 AM
|
#3
|
|
Piston Honda
|
The population issues are already well documented and have been discussed ad infinitum. IMHO, it is the largest thing that has held back Horde raiding progression, and has exacerbated the "Paladins vs. Shaman" debate (for the record, I think it's blatantly obvious that paladins are better than shaman in a raid setting, but I think that population is a much larger handicap).
As for the "aesthetics = general opinion of a raid instance" argument...I don't think it holds much water. For one, hardcore raiders generally seem to only care about the quality of the instance itself (difficulty/challenge, fight mechanics, duration required to clear the zone, etc. etc. etc.), not how it looks. Another is that people don't like AQ40 because the fights aren't much fun, the drops are generally not worth the time investment required, and the zone is just too...freaking...long. When they have to implement a teleporter, you know it's too big. It's about three times as big as it needs to be, and has twice the trash that needs to be there. Not to mention the fact that the last two trash zones are more difficult than all the previous boss encounters inside the instance itself, yet give absolutely no reward to the raid for getting through them except access to the last two bosses.
And you might find Naxx to be interesting, but for Horde who have been looking at Undercity for two years, it brings absolutely nothing new in terms of aesthetics. Blizzard seems to have learned their lesson in Naxx. With the exception of idiotic ideas like not allowing Frogger to despawn after you kill Grobbulus and the huge PITA that is the Heigan tunnel (once again an obvious attempt by Blizzard to mask a weak, poorly designed boss with a trash zone that manages to be annoyingly long and frustrating, yet completely boring and unchallenging all at the same time).
|
"User is a tremendous douchenozzel"
-Actual EJ Forums feedback concerning Goreshot.
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 5:58 AM
|
#4
|
|
Piston Honda
Murloc Warrior
Jubei'Thos
|
I'd agree that its usually not the aesthetics of an instance that make them unpopular, but more the gameplay - especially the trash. I think 15-20 mins of clearing for an experienced group, and 30-40 for an inexperienced is doable. That crap after Twin Emps was almost twice that long, and reclearing the 5 guys before the Emps each night when you were learning them wasn't much fun either.
MC has a ton of very boring 1-2 pulls where you tank and spank and try not to fall asleep. AQ just has way too damn much trash.
Conversely, I always liked BWL. 2 bosses right up front, and larger trash groups that still required actually paying attention, at least in the early days. And ZG has no more than 15 mins between boss encounters, with the Spider room being the worst offender, but even that is short compared to some of the 40man stuff.
Respawns are an issue that I hope they pay attention to. Having 1-2 gauntlet style encounters is alright, but any other time I want stuff to stay dead. Rekilling trash the next night is just boring and frustrating.
Once people have run a zone a few times I think they cease to pay much attention at all to what it looks like. It will always be about how the 'fun' in the instance is parcelled out vs. the 'work', and how those factors are balanced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 6:25 AM
|
#5
|
|
Von Kaiser
Human Warrior
Turalyon (EU)
|
I love the first hour of AQ40. You can clear up to and including Huhuran in a pretty straightforward and speedy manner once you know the encounters. Things start to go wrong from that point on though. The trash between Huhuran and Emps is annoying but with sufficient practice you can normally get through it quickly and without too many problems. The real problem comes after the Emps. Every single person in our guild hates the Emps -> C'Thun trash clear with a passion. There just doesn't seem to be a way to speed things up - how fast you can clear it entirely depends on how the packs have been put together. If you end up getting several quad mindslayer packs you can say goodbye to a quick clear.
Sure there are some areas of AQ40 where the aesthetics of the zone are a bit poor but there are a couple of areas that I really like - the series of shallow pools just before Huhuran for example. The main problem I think most people have with the zone is the annoying trash...
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 6:37 AM
|
#6
|
|
Don Flamenco
Undead Mage
Frostmane (EU)
|
The reasons why people in my guild didn't like AQ was post C'thun trash and very slow wipe recovery when learning the instance, running for 10/15 mins every wipe?
For me AQ40 was an interesting instance tbh, new mobs, concepts, design and some nice bosses with C'thun being still one of the best designed/rewarding encounters for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 6:38 AM
|
#7
|
|
Great Tiger
|
The biggest problem contributing to the faction imbalance on PvE servers is that Blizzard ignored it for so long. Coupling that with server that cannot handle sufficient populations (on many servers indeed Horde has little or no viable raiding community simply because 30% of the present queue cap is not a viable population given random seeding) and you have a recipe for exactly what we see now. Now make that worse by allowing relatively easy re-rolls and it avalanches into a serious issue on many, many servers. After all, why stay Horde on a heavily imbalanced server when all that gives you is a small pool of players to draw from, insane relative competition from the other faction for resources and world bosses and a constant ass-kicking in world PvP? Only irrational stubborn people stay and although we are an interesting crowd, I know many, many smart and competant players that re-rolled a hell of a long time ago.
I do think it was all avoidable and it's a shame it wasn't. Bye the bye, the female squid/demon-people are still more 'sexy' than the BE version. In fact, they seem to be going out the way to make BE females less appealing with things like mini-weapons and the like. I won't even touch the priest racial ongoing issue.
Meh, perhaps Horde is intended to be perceived as 'hard mode'. I don't exactly think it's true for certain but so be it I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 6:49 AM
|
#8
|
|
Piston Honda
Human Death Knight
Medivh
|
AQ40's look was something of a let down, as I remember it being described as a temple. Most of it is under a temple, and this building dedicated to an old god is actually small and unimpressive. I kinda like the feeling of climbing up a building, or working to the center. Why would they close off C'thun but leave that long, winding tunnel open to allow a back door to him? The encounters, and most of the trash are fine. Huhuran was stupid when there was no craftable NR gear. Mindslayers are retarded, and I'd tank Vek'lor without SR gear if it meant they wouldn't spawn. C'thun, Ouro, and the Twin Emperors are still fun to me 9 bosses into Naxx.
As for the Blood Elves and their appearance, find a model viewer and look at the Draenei. I'm more impressed with Draenei females than Blood Elf females. Blood Elf females faces look like they are repainted versions of Undead females. So do their bodies, just without the bones poking out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 6:55 AM
|
#9
|
|
Always carry a white flag
Undead Death Knight
Twisting Nether (EU)
|
If you compare the two most "dull" instances MC and AQ40, you'll see one big difference in terms of trash. In MC, when you first got there, you were clearing everything, or close to. As time went by tho, you found the most efficient path, dodging quite a few pulls(pulling shaz into garr's room with a hunter's pet to avoid 2more fire packs, dodging all those giants around gehenas and fighting him in a smaller zone etc...). Also since you're going faster, you avoid killing patrols more than once.
With AQ, even as you progress, you still have to pull the same amount of mobs, which are virtually still just as annoying as they were the first time(4mindflayers pull because people are bored to hell with AQ already and usually stop paying attention). Another big issue compared to MC is, even in not so great gear, you can clear MC trash with just one button on every class pretty much(need more than one to hold aggro on giants once your rogues get geared I guess, and taunt helps after knockbacks ^^). You don't need to focus your attention much, it's a bit slower but it works. You have to focus entirely on what you're doing for pre emp and post emp trash(everything before huhuran is just crap tho, you can probably 5-10man all of it). The big anubisath come with the random abilities(good idea), but some combinations highly favors ranged dps which can hurt badly when your raid is made of 8rogues and 8 wars, especially when they're immune to fire and all your mages were speced for rolling ignites. I'm sure some people encountered those, it's just bad luck and even if you manage to kill it, you'll usually end up with lots of deaths, and as such high repairs.
Repairs is another factor. In AQ, you die a lot if your healers are semi sleeping, especially as rogues, but I guess everyone dies equally, and non sleeping healers usually aggro the mobs who fears/stuns/knockback and die swiftly too. At this point of the game tho, your gear is good, so repairs are expensive. Yet AQ is one of the worst instance when it comes to gold gains. Everyone knows that, mobs only loot crappy grey vendor crap, so it's usually the same 3-4melees who get all the loot, you can share it but it's a pain in the ass. Bosses drop an insane low amount of money too. As time goes by, when you perform good in MC, you get decent money out of it, and you can sell those core leathers and fiery/lava cores to other guilds, and T1 BoP, and sulfuron ingots if you're done with that. In AQ you only get those goddamn inventory hogging statues and scarabs that everyone gets anyway.
That's why imo, a lot of people dislike AQ, the risk/reward factor is not so great, because the loot is so specific, trying to fill alternative niches which isn't great for most raiders. Graphically, I wouldn't say AQ is displeasing, I actually like the look, it felt like an alien based SF movie, the caverns are huge and use different color hues, and you have older architecture in like Chtun or Twin Emps rooms. Chtun room specifically, and the fight as a whole are awesome ideas. But no one wants to clear trash for 3hours with an average 2deaths per clear for everyone in the raid if they don't get money/loot for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 7:14 AM
|
#10
|
|
Piston Honda
Undead Mage
Earthen Ring (EU)
|
|
Originally Posted by DeusEx
Expect Horde/Alliance imbalance be thing of the past in a few months.
|
I really don't agree with this. Assuming a big influx of new players doesn't arrive (and even so, why should they automatically join Horde over Alliance?) happen why would the old Alliance players leave their familiar players, friends and alts and join the other side? Because Horde has a "pretty" race?
I think you grossly underestimate the strength of friends and familiarity, if you want a new char. Just create a new char. You can soon even create shamans on alliance, so even less reason to change.
And has been said before, I think the main reason AQ40 is disliked is because it's just too damn long and the trash is too annoying. The risk/reward ratio, as mentioned above, is not a promising prospect either. In a raid of 40 people only a small percentage is going to get some loot, the rest must get some reward for it. MC and especially BWL is great in that aspect, once you have learned the place it's a quick and fast ~25g, it is nice to get some of what you spent learning it back over time, with the added bonus of picking up some eluding gear that rarely drops :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 7:17 AM
|
#11
|
|
Chief Passenger
Schizzle
Gnome Rogue
No WoW Account (EU)
|
I don't think the aesthetics of the races have much to do with the faction imbalance. Rather, I think it's down to the perception of Alliance as "the good guys" and Horde as "the bad guys". Now, in Warcraft lore it's clear this is not the case, but the Tolkienisation of the human/orc conflict is an almost insuperable barrier.
What we need is *not* the clearly evil Blood Elves. We need a good and honourable race on the Horde side, and a clearly evil one on Alliance side, to break through the current Manichean perceptions of the factions. Blizzard however are straying further and further from that. Once the initial surge of 14-year-olds get bored of tossing off over Belf females, the faction imbalance is going to get worse, not better.
What I would find extremely cool is if one of the races decided to swap factions - not a cat in hell's chance of that happening though. And you can't get round the problem by giving faction transfers (e.g. if you could grind Horde rep as a human and "swap sides") - in fact, that would only exacerbate things. But imagine the reprecussions if the Undead decided to defect from the Horde and force an uneasy alliance with the, er.. Alliance based on the shared enemy in the Lich King. You'd have a breakaway human faction that refused to work with the Undead and instead come to terms with the noble Tauren and the recovering Orcs - give all human players a one-time-only chance to swap, or some such. Never gonna happen though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 7:28 AM
|
#12
|
|
Piston Honda
|
Faction and Race imbalance:
I'll totally agree on all the points you made here, however do you really think that the population imbalance will be made up significantly due to blood elves? I have my doubt's that the number of people that will reroll/buy the game and roll, horde will be enough to cover the massive population imbalance on some servers.
Recepetion of Raid and Dungeon Content:
I agree totally. well, I friggen hate ZG... mostly because I got very very tired of killing trolls, holy crap we kill alot of trolls in this game. But oh man Naxxarama is so well designed. When I zoned in the first time I fell in love, and then was instantly crushed as a realized that my guild had zero chance of beating it. : (
Similarly AQ40 blew me away when I zone in... I had taken about 3 months off and my guild was on the emps when I came back, so I got to see the entire instance very quickly, and really liked it, its quite colorful and interesting... At first. Then all of the tunnels and passages kinda blend to one. I think the problems with the design are:
A) Zero lore. I zoning into BWL, I knew all about Nef and his zany hijinks.. and was actually moved when I saw what he did to Vael, jerk face black dragon flight. It really made me want to kill that mother fucker. in AQ40? some bugs? what the hell were those even doing there? C'thun was interesting.. and the Emps would have been more cool if they didnt look retarded.
B) None of the eye candy does anything or means anything. Even worse than MC where you could at least play in lava. In BWL you have crazy blood things and forboding dead dragons. thats -awesome-
C) Trash. As Pyros mentioned. Its long, and unrewarding.. and in the case of Emps and C'thun trash really hard and annoying.
D) Monies. Why the hell are those bugs so poor. Once BWL is on farm you run through, get some loots have a fun time and make enough to pay repair bills for the next raid or so. AQ40 is just kinda disapointing. You run through it and come out behind in gold despite a good quick clear. its lame.
E) Huhu. Don't. Do. Resistance. Fights. holy crap.
Blah, even thinking of AQ makes me sad. And I'm a feral druid! It really is a pitty that C'thun a fight that I consider one of the best designed and fun in the game (keeping in mine I only got 5 bosses killed in naxx) is at the end of such a boring dredge of an instance.
In relation to the new races I won't be playing either of them anytime soon. Maybe a BE to level 20 or so.. just to see the starting areas. The new alliance race however... First off I won't even try and type their name, its impossible hard, and doesn't even have a handy abbrevation. Not to mention the whole "space shaman" thing. I really dislike them, man.
Edit: Fuck emoticons.
|
\"Listen, I\'m trying to have a serious conversation about ferret bras and you are not listening\"
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 7:32 AM
|
#13
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
Very strong post, I love this type of stuff :)
Brief note guys – this isn’t a “Best practice: AQ 40 sucks olol” thread :P

|
Originally Posted by DeusEx
Faction and Race imbalance:
It is obvious that Alliance outnumbers Horde on most servers to some significant degree. Infact the disparity is so large that it leads to several unpleasant balancing issues: small raiding community on Horde side, BG queues for Alliance, difficulties in implementing open PvP content, more limited economy on Horde side.
The reasons for this have almost nothing to do with hard facts on conscious and rationale race and therefore faction choices. The forum whining over WoTF alone should imply that at least half of the WoW player population should chose Undead as the race of their choice. There are other underlying issues at work: perceived physical attractiveness and "tolkienization". The Alliance has not only received all the sexy or cute races but is designed with the "Tolkien Fantasy Standard" in mind. Humans, Elves, Dwarfs. The only exception are the Gnomes and their "steampunk" culture. Interestingly enough this steampunk element received quite a much of critisism from the more conservative fantasy players during beta and after release. The same thing that happens now with TBC and the Sci-Fi elements of the Netherstorm area. "Tolkien Fantasy Standard" is a strong and imho unfortunate force in the western hemisphere when it comes to game design. My own desicion for chosing Horde has been greatly influenced by my idiosyncrasy for the tolkienization of the fantasy genre.
The physical attractivness of the Alliance races makes things only worse. Everything about NE females screams of sexual innuendo and Horde had nothing to compete with this.
In short Sex and Tolkien define the faction imbalance. Blizzard basically admitted to it by designing Bloodelfs with this in mind. Horde now gets a Tolkien Race (Elves) with more than their share of sexuality. Expect Horde/Alliance imbalance be thing of the past in a few months.
|
I think there are a couple of other factors;
There is also the Horde factor of being the “underdog” faction. Being the “underdog” can work both ways; it can be a deterrent for a social raider who wants a lot of guild options, but it can be an attractive measure for someone who enjoys a challenge and being a little more unique.
One the note of factors not exerting a uniform influence, I find the ‘sexy’ appeal of alliance is actually a deterrent for me – and although I even consider it immature to think this way, I can’t help but think of Alliance as the “kiddy” faction. Well-built male model human priests, dragon-slayers who can’t resist the urge to flip on the spot, and Kel’thuzad geared mages who wear pink hair in a cute little bun. But I guess it works both ways: My Alliance playing friends can’t help but resist making “No shoes” comments (I'm Troll) :’(
Also, I’ve always thought that a lot of class population imbalances can be explained by aesthetics. In order to play a Druid, for example, you have to like elves or tauren – yet to play a Warrior, you can like any race. Aesthetic preferences, therefore, can partially explain the Warrior population. I’ve often asked; Do people decide race, or class, first? Does one trump the other or do they have different weightings in people’s minds? Even my present character (Troll Hunter) involved choosing my favourite race but only my second favourite class (although in the long run I found I prefer hunters anyway). Some combinations also lock in better; Orc Warriors are more popular than Undead Warriors, yet Orc Warlocks are less popular than Undead Warlocks.
It’d also be interested to see how different servers differ in their A:H balance. I’m lucky to be on Frostmourne which is an extremely well-balanced server. The community is different to a lot of servers in that it’s largely Australian and Singaporean, with a decent number of New Zealanders and Late-night Americans/Canadians. Maybe Singaporeans are less fascinated with the Tolkein-image, and hence less inclined to choose Alliance; Australia also has a “pro underdog” mentality that might encourage Horde. Maybe there are other dimensions that makes our server more balanced than most.
Good topic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 7:33 AM
|
#14
|
|
Great Tiger
|
I stand alone and proud in liking Pre-C'Thun trash. It's all about survival of the fittest, and winning the damage meter contest and the # of deaths contest is a prize that I hold dear [almost] every week. Unpredictable mobs, no CC, MC everywhere, random mob abilities, I love it.
And yes, I know I'm alone, and possibly psychotic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 7:39 AM
|
#15
|
|
Don Flamenco
Undead Warlock
Al'Akir (EU)
|
Personally, I like almost every boss encounter in AQ. Viscidus is a bit poorly tuned, but the only fight I specifically dislike doing is Ouro. Because of the randomness and our brute-force strategy, it feels like we've never actually learned the encounter. We just kill him slightly faster than he kills us. If we're lucky, 3-5 people survive the scarabs too!
Skeram, Sartura, Huhuran, Viscidus and especially Emps and C'thun are all great fights in my book. Well designed and difficulty-wise where they should be (Viscidus being the stupid exception, although I'm Horde, so I don't have any direct issues with the fight).
Apart from the trashaton after Emps which has already been covered, the only thing I can put my finger on as a negative is the psychological effect of the instance on people. I think the actual dungeon looks cool, but consider the concept for a second: You're going deep down inside a bug's hole. Molten Core had a lot of the same concept, and people say a lot of the same things about MC and AQ. BWL and Naxx on the other hand, people usually prefer spending an evening in either of these. My theory is that it's, unlike MC/AQ, because of their structural design and conceptual locations. Of course they're on some instance server seperated from the world. But once you're inside, you're ascending a spire (or a floating citadel) and continously going upwards (Vael->Suppresion room, Firemaw->Ebonroc, or in Naxx: Lower tier bosses->Saph/Kel). I think these are two things that, while not always mentioned directly, often have a subconcious impact of people's impression of the zone.
TL;DR version: In MC/AQ you move downwards in naturally designed caves. Bad. :angry: In BWL/Naxx you move upwards in building-like hallways and corridors. Good :woop:
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 7:49 AM
|
#16
|
|
Von Kaiser
Orc Shaman
Chromaggus (EU)
|
|
Originally Posted by songster
We need a good and honourable race on the Horde side, and a clearly evil one on Alliance side, to break through the current Manichean perceptions of the factions.
|
What are tauren then? Lore wise, I don't think there is as good and honorable race on alliance side as tauren are. Big gentle giants who don't beat their kids and are portrayed as the victim in their wars against centaur and those pig-men. Also, dwarfs and gnomes are the industrial maniacs of wow, and on alliance side. In Tolkien world the industrialization was one of the ways of showing why orcs and their kin were evil.
There has already been a lot of mixing of traditional tolkien races and their roles. Lotr is just so dug in western culture that people won't even see races as they are portrayed in the game. A lot of the views on races aren't based on the events of wow lore, but in how races were in lotr. I mean, if you take your time reading the quest text in wow, the only evil race is forsaken. Evil as in their enemy is life, so their allies are also just tools to beat their enemies. Orc and trolls, for example, aren't doing anything that's more evil than what night elves or humans do.
Besides, wasn't Warcraft I originally a warhammer game? Blizzard just never got the rights from games workshop to release it as warhammer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 7:57 AM
|
#17
|
|
Glass Joe
Blood Elf Priest
Drak'thul (EU)
|
All you need is a cross-faction transfers and voila, there you go. A:H sorted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 7:58 AM
|
#18
|
|
Mailbox Dancer
Undead Priest
Kil'Jaeden (EU)
|
Regarding AQ40: I don't deny at all that AQ40 has problems beyond aesthetics, but the graphics are a recurring theme, when you talk on Vent/TS about the attractivity of AQ40. You will often hear the words "bland, dull, boring" associated with it. I still think that the aesthetics of a given instance have a quite strong underlying effect on how much you are going to enjoy it even on repeated runs; often enough you stand around with nothing to do and having a little eye candy while waiting goes a long way. If it would be otherwise, then something I read on the General Forums in a casual vs. hardcore flamewar thread, would be true: "Raiders would be willing to play Pong for hours, if it would only yield epics". I hope this not to be true.
On improving faction balance through the introduction of BE race: It will certainly take a while, but people switch servers and factions all the time. Given that Horde will now seem like a more attractive choice, the imbalance will lessen over time.
|
Originally Posted by songster
I don't think the aesthetics of the races have much to do with the faction imbalance. Rather, I think it's down to the perception of Alliance as "the good guys" and Horde as "the bad guys". Now, in Warcraft lore it's clear this is not the case, but the Tolkienisation of the human/orc conflict is an almost insuperable barrier.
|
While I agree that Horde is perceived as "evil" because of tolkienesque stereotypes, that's exactly the reason why it will be overlooked that the Blood Elves are malicious little creatures indeed. Personally I find it great that if we have to have elves at all, ours will be distinctively bad and bitchy at least.
|
Originally Posted by Mosh
TL;DR version: In MC/AQ you move downwards in naturally designed caves. Bad. mad In BWL/Naxx you move upwards in building-like hallways and corridors. Good woop
|
I have thought of this myself. The popular instances are mostly of a architectural and not cave nature.
Let's look at the popular 5 mans:
Scarlet Monastery, Dire Maul, Shadowfang Keep, Stratholme are all architectural dungeons. Maraudon would be the odd one: a popular cave like instance.
Not let's look at the Dungeons seemingly everone hates:
Wailing Caverns, Razorfen Kraul, Razorfen Down, Ragefire Chasm are all cave like dungeons. Gnomereagan would be the odd one here (though I personally quite like it), perhaps because you go down there? (Haven't thought about the descending/ascending thing in dungeon design, but it could be on a very subconscious level).
|
I'm not an addict ... maybe that's a lie.
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 8:27 AM
|
#19
|
|
Glass Joe
Night Elf Priest
Arathor (EU)
|
One of the problems I always had with AQ40 was the faceless nature of most of the bosses. In both lore and design they represent little more than enlarged trash. Defeating them lacked psychological emphasis, they were "encounters" rather than "bosses".
As encounters I think they worked better than those before them. Possibly due to the way in which we approached AQ as a guild, but the development of skills and understanding was far more prevelant and diverse than MC and blackwing. But they didn't feel as good.
I've always seen a bosses death as a mark on the learning curve, I really hate seeing things brute forced, but even I struggle to muster a sense of victory when Giant Bug Number 3 finally buys it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 8:30 AM
|
#20
|
|
Fear and Loathing in Mos Eisley
|
Regardless of why people pick one character/race/class/faction over another (it's a number of factors, not just one like some are arguing), it's the resulting faction imbalance which actually hold weight regarding game balance. I believe Blizzard ultimately admitting that no matter what they influence could change what people favor to even population ratios out led to the decision to allow paladins and shamans for both races. It still does leave world pvp balance an issue, though an elegant solution to that seems quite tricky. There doesn't seem to be much else mechanic-wise which isn't being remedied by various upcoming BC changes.
Re:AQ
Sometimes I feel like the only person in existence who enjoys those two instances. Graphically AQ is a breath of fresh air, with it's Egypt-meets-Aliens look in structure and creature design that is completely foreign to most everything else in game. Killing giant bugs and freakish mutants while crawling through organic tunnels covered in ooze, lit by fireflies, I dig it. Lore-wise it's one of the most epic storylines so far, and also almost entirely developed in WoW as opposed to pulling from previous games or books. It's the culmination of a story arc starting as far back as the Barrens for the Horde. Sure, the place has it's downsides... who the hell loves a quadruple Mindslayer pull. Yet I have a hard time thinking it's just the overall length and the later trash mobs which generally make people rate AQ lower.
With all that AQ seemingly has going for it, I'm thinking perhaps that the same reasons are also why it's not on many people's lists of love. Along with Gnomeregan it's the least classically Tolkein-fantasy-style place in the game. No evil dragons or big bad firey thingies or reanimated menaces. The WoW-contained lore lacks those ties to other games and books... though while extremely cool to me, it lacks the identifiable nature that people are prone to looking for. Combine that with the noted design flaws and a hefty learning curve halfway through AQ40 to frustrate disciplined guilds, then I think you have a plate full of stuff which doesn't look quite as appetizing.
Considering that AQ was the first truly "foreign" content and concept added to the Warcraft universe, it makes me wonder how content from BC and beyond (which isn't Northrend) will be received. Perhaps the shock reaction to new design/lore/content will die down as it keeps coming.
|
Give me your hand and I will hold it forever... on my nightstand in a box with your love letters.
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 8:38 AM
|
#21
|
|
Von Kaiser
Draenei Shaman
Twilight's Hammer (EU)
|
I for one think that AQ40 looks completely amazing. Definitely the coolest looking dungeon bar Naxxramas. The reason why I don't like AQ is that pre huhuran you have more dull trashpacks than most of MC combined. Just a horde of bugs that stand in your way that you need to kill, they are not challenging for the raid in the least but because of their abilites there is a pretty decent chance that you will get instagibbed. Emps is the first fun encounter in AQ40 imo, but whoever thought up the post emps trash should take a bullet in the forehead. Ouro is so-so, the model looks cool ofc. :P C'thun is the proof that when blizzard put their minds to it they achieve perfection. Even after 12 bosses down in naxx I still think C'thun is the most well designed and fun encounter in the game. It's just to bad that you have fight your way through that battalion of trash packs before you can get to him. :(
|
I am Bender, please insert girder
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 8:49 AM
|
#22
|
|
Piston Honda
|
The single soft factor that influences my game experience is the total lack of any type of lore progression in WoW. Yes, after 2 years we have climbed up from a worthless elemental lieutenant, to killing a weakend state of an old god, then up to the Lich, Kel'Thuzad. But... Lady Prestor is still Onyxia and Bolvar is still charmed. The Scarlet Crusade is still being led by the dreadlord Balnazzar. The Horde and Alliance, although supposedly at a truce, are still all KoS to each other and offer no way to communicate or work together. The lack of GM-led events I guess I can understand (although with the amount of money they are making off the game--- I'll save that for another discussion), but the total lack of any story progression just leaves me wondering: What are our characters doing all this fighting for? If there isn't some sort of progression when the expansion hits, I'm sure I'll find some other game to play.
If I load TBC and when I log in, the king of the humans is still missing and Lady Prestor is still Onyxia, I'll seriously question whether WoW is just a money factory for Blizzard or whether the developers actually care about building a world for their player community.
PS When will the inn in Sentinel Hill be completed? They've been working day and night on that place for years.
|
I believe in Harvey Dent.
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 8:50 AM
|
#23
|
|
I'm the girl that the ESRB warned you about.
Blood Elf Priest
Mal'Ganis
|
I can sum up my thoughts on BWL vs. AQ in two excerpts from teh fromt page posts on our forums.
Razergore:
"We're taking back our Mountain....
One dead dragon at a time."
&
Nefarian:
"Tonight, the mountain is ours Rebirth.
Savor the enjoyment of a job well done! "
VS
Skerem:
"In the interests of keeping things short, we shall from here forward be known as bug exterminators. We thought it was just dragons and rock monsters that needed to die, but apparently there's this giant hole in the ground and we are, of course, inclined to go into it and slaughter the residents. "
&
C'Thun:
"Congratulations to everyone who spent countless hours banging their head against him. It has been a long time, and it was a pleasure to be there. For the people who are new to the fight, welcome to Rebirth, we kill dragons (and our definition of dragon is pretty loose)."
BWL had that feeling of flow from boss to boss as though you really were killing your way through the mountain to get to Nefarian.... who would someday fly off his balcony and rain havoc onto the world. Reaching the top of the mountain, seeing daylight out over the balcony = Awesome. Nefarian entering swooping down out of the sky to flame us... that was AWESOME. It didn't AMTTER how hard he was- I remember the utter chaos that came from our first attempt on Nef- we made it to the landing and everyone on vent just stopped and was so astounded at how cool the second stage of the encounter was- that we wiped miserably.
AQ40? It's not like C'thun was going to crawl out of his hole. Sure there was some vague kind of lore that said that you were rescuing some dragon people- but frankly the epic feeling of it was totally missing. The size and scope were there, but the lore simply wasn't. What the heck was Sartura doing down in that hole? Twin Emps? They were standing around waiting to get killed in new and exciting ways.
BWL has *Dragons* *Flying* through the area. That was 100kinds of awesome right there. Humanoid tinkers doing tinker like things in semi believable labs. Those bugs could have been doing amazing things, but it just doesn't translate into anything more than "we'll that was a pack of really annoying bug trash"
Looking at Naxx- the creepie crawlies are in their own wing (reasonably so... frankly. I wouldn't want to share office space with Maexx), they've got a purpose. They're preparing an invasion! The humanoid bosses are either in rooms with followers (See Grand Widow. That's a perfectly reasonable place to expect to find a moderately powerful boss... being worshiped by her followers!) or rooms with semi interesting architecture with semi comprehensible objectives. Heigan is working on the slime... he's even got that room to play in for his experiments. Noth is pacing, presumably contemplating his skeleton summoning spells which would be incredibly awesome if unleashed into the world. Gotta kill that guy and keep it from getting loose! All these guys are semi mobile and clearly a threat to the world at large.
Fankriss? Fankriss is a bug in a freaking hole. I exterminate bugs because I don't like them, but I'm not terribly worried about fankriss laying waste to Stormwind.... he's an overgrown earwig for godssake!
I won't say that the soft factors are the only reason fro the success or lack of for game elements. I'm wearing some of the most hideous gear in the game because it's excellent... but the game surroundings can help with the mood you're in when dealing wiht the 20th pack of random mob X. At least in Naxx it's probably something somewhat different while still having a measure of believability.
If I were KT, I'd be big on putting all of my creators together in one place and having them test out their creations in relative safety before releasing them into the world.
If I were C'Thun... well I'd be an immobile squid like creature and while I might have dreams of world domination- the truth is that I'm suck in the freaking hole in the ground and I lack legs.
I think it all boils down to legs.
I can't find any excitement killing the virtual equivalent of a quadriplegic in his own bedroom. It's not sporting.
|
Originally Posted by Disquette
How fortuitous. Usually we have to leave this thread to feed.
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 8:56 AM
|
#24
|
|
And It's Delicious
<>
Orc Shaman
No WoW Account
|
When we got an AQ40 instance from another guild for a few weeks with everything up to Emps cleared, our guild liked doing AQ40.
When we had to clear from the start, we didn't.
It's a bit too long, there's a bit too much trash, and it simply ranges too widely. It isn't about visual appeal, it isn't about fight design (hell, AQ40 fights are generally quite well designed, only Huhu strikes me as truly uninteresting, since it's 99% gear check), it's simply a little too tedious for rewards not quite worth the time. Cut out 1/3 of the trash, same as they basically did with ZG, and I honestly think the instance would be much better received; it'd go from a 5 hour clear to a <4 hour clear for a guild doing it right, which is a *huge* difference in practice.
And it's too bad, because (as everyone else keeps reiterating) - after seeing every fight in the game except Viscidus, C'thun is still one of the top few fights in terms of being fun every single time. (On the other hand, I really, really like Gothik... so.)
|
|
Originally Posted by Vontre
Oh, nah, I just type things for the sake of typing things. ^_^
|
|
Originally Posted by Lyta
The dog nailed me like three times that day. It resulted in my ass hitting the ground and my legs waving in the air.
|
|
|
|
|
01/02/07, 9:03 AM
|
#25
|
|
Such a Cassandra
|
|
Originally Posted by Warleona
All you need is a cross-faction transfers and voila, there you go. A:H sorted.
|
Either it would stabilize populations or it would lead to the wholesale elimination of Horde raiding population as guild after guild says "Screw it" and goes to the side with the larger recruiting population. I suspect the latter.
Windrunner Horde has suffered from that even with people having to give up such epics as they have already and re-roll. If all it took to change sides was going to Blizzard's website, there wouldn't be a Horde raiding population on Windrunner in three months.
Blood Elves and Horde paladins might just stabilize for the future, but I can't see any hard factors to encourage the gap to close unless Blizzard bites the bullet and intentionally encourages the Horde for a while (bonus xp for the Horde, encouraging new players and re-rolls to go Horde and giving Horde and their new paladins a leg-up on the way to 70, would not be a terrible idea).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|