Originally Posted by Magictricks
I know the talent trees are far from final and bound to change but i just couldn't help myself.
WoW Talent Calculator - Sigrie
lose LB but you make up for it with AP, POM, and all the other damage boosting arcane talents.
Any fight with a pulsing aura your fireballs will all be 60% more damaging.
|
Living Bomb is a ~5% boost in itselt right now, plus Hot Streak. It will benefit more from DoT talents and counts towards Critical Mass, and Fireball base scaling will get reduced. You'll also lose 1,27% damage and crit and 1.5% (I think) non-DoT damage from having only 43/51 points in your main tree.
The last pushback fight I'm aware of was M'uru, and even there they removed it in their first review. It would be really fun and effective in Pushback Hell, but there are too many things wrong with Pushback Hell as a design in itself. And it's a single-use gimmick. Still, a fun possibility.
On another note, I took a look at consumables when I was thinking about mana dependency and conversion. Level 85 flasks are +300 to str/agi/sta/int, there are obviously 4 flasks. Potions look more interesting however. At level 78, there is one to restore 9k HP, one for 11k mana, one for 8.6k mana and HP (with small variances), at 80 there is one with 1-20.000 mana and HP and one with 20k mana over 10s while you are defenseless (at worth, that's dreamless sleep Mk IV), to to disguise yourself as someone else (a PnP game master might allow that as threat dump, that would definitely be a creative use!), and at level 85, there is a 1250 int for 25s potion.
If you have to use Evocation, using that during your intellect potion is probably a good idea. You gain ~12k extra mana at the cost of ~20k extra damage damage compare to usign Evocation outside the potion cooldown. It's certainly better than mana potting, and will likely continue to do so even with level 85 mana potions. And I don't think they can break or remove the extra mana Evo-on-Int-Potion easily either. They can do all other sorts of things however. Evo-on-temporary-Int looks certainly interesting, but I wouldn't be surprised if it gets scrapped.