I'm not sure I can agree on the conclusions.

What you're fundamentally saying is that increasing 10% dmg buff to 11% if a bigger proportional increase than increasing a 100% dmg buff to 101%. It's mathematically correct, but there's no absolute gain there.

It's not like post 4.1 1 extra point of mastery will give us more damage than it does now; a single point of mastery is still a 5.6% increase.

I may be missing something but it looks like an extremely convoluted way to say that if we have less mastery from our base stats, then the mastery we get from gear makes up for a bigger percentage of our mastery. In your example above, adding one point of mastery to the pre-4.1 warrior would bring him to 206.6%, post 4.1 to 172.8%. The proportional increase is greater, but there's no actual damage gain to be had anywhere. Mastery doesn't have diminishing returns, as far as I know.

Наборы для игры в покер, в наличии как профессиональные фишки, так и фишки для домашней игры. Наборы для покера
как оптом, так и в розницу. �*лектронные сигареты оптом и в розницу! Самая низая цена!
Наборы для покера в кейсах (чемоданчиках) дешевле чем везде, например набор в боксе на 100 фишек-180 руб,
�*лектронные сигареты, не одноразовые, очень хорошего качества-355 руб за 1 пачку.
Более подробно на pokervam.ru

Предложение ограничено!!

Great theorycraft, makes me has much better time tanking in bere form.
Question: For Cho'gall reg w/ a 356 ilvl, what do you guys think is better, agi/mast or sta/dodge

Self-edited so i don't get banned. Way to pursue some interesting research.

Curious about stat priority for Fire mages, and why there is so much deviation between sources.

Some simulators, actually most, have haste and mastery very close to crit. Others believe crit is much higher in the weights than haste and mastery.

There is deviation between haste and mastery which is more important here and there as well. And from what I gather from the community, the 'general' consensus I got from asking a few mages is crit > mastery > haste.

Is there anything concrete with solid and proven math that has the answer that seems to be close to the holy grail, "what is the CORRECT stat priority for fire mages" with concrete proof?

I also come across deviation as well regarding Theralion's mirror, the true worth of DMC:V, and their weight with the bell of enraging resonance in the mix of it.

I am truly perplexed. Any math or some sort of sign would be much appreciated, I'm not one for mathematics.

Edit: Concerning about the stat priority for fire mages, I believe rawr even had haste over crit in stat weight.

Stat weightings (and thus priorities) depend strongly on your current stats. Gaining a few points of one stat can flip the values completely over. Haste is an extreme candidate for that: The value just before hitting a breakpoint is very high because of the DPS increase provided by hitting that breakpoint, while the DPS increase after hitting that breakpoint reduces by quite a noticable amount.
Using a simulator/formulator is the only way to get reliable information about what gear to use. I highly recommend using Rawrs Optimize feature for any gear questions. Check the Optimizer documentation for a nice How-To.

Zero armor, 5/33/3 fire build, Prime glyphs: FB(+5% crit)/FFB (15% damage +3% over 12sec)/MA (2% crit all spells).

stats:
SP- 205
crit- 10.22% (15.22% FB)
haste- 3.00%
mastery- 8.00

Fireball (non-crit): 1465 - 1758
Frostfire bolt (non-crit):1570 - 1658
Frostfire dot (non-crit): 15/tick@ 1 stack 34/tick at 3 stacks

Fireball (crit) 3581 - 4000
frostfire bolt (crit) 3601 - 4000
Frostfire dot (crit) 91

On the test dummy, consuming a 22.3 mana pool, my dps from stand alone fb casting was 870.8 and my dps from stand alone FFB casting was 805.7 each iteration had (funny enough) 19 casts: 17 hits, 1 crit, 1 miss. This was done in 10 cycles of each, the range of each was (66) fireball, and (72) frostfire bolt and at no point did frostfire bolt cycles out dps fireball cycles out side of 1 extreme swing.

Keep in mind that this is a limited test sample, and is limited to single target. I will caveat that Frostfire bolt cycles would show increased dps for AoE/cleave heavy fights (such as halfus) but with these being few and far between, I don't see how a introducing a lower dps primary nuke into a rotation that has all ready been shown to be the best dps rotation is justified.

My opinion is that you should just stick with one nuke exclusively. With a preference to Fireball.

The new 353 wands in 4.1: Zulian Voodoo Stick - Items - Sigrie and Touch of Discord - Items - Sigrie

vs.

[Vicious Gladiator's Touch of Defeat]

Is 107 int+72 crit > 101 int+61 crit+72 haste or 101 int+66 hit+69 mastery?
With pvp wand you get 6 more intellect (and 11 crit) which is prio stat.

Yes you get 6 more int and 11 more crit rating, but you lose (for example) 72 haste. Even if you assume scaling to be 3:1.5:1 (int:crit:haste) which is not fully correct since haste worth more and crit a bit less, you get that: 3x6 + 11x1.5= 34.5 < 72x1= 72. So the ilvl 353 wand is better.

Greetings, I am havin problems with my warrior, I don't think it's a matter of rotation or personal skill (I hope so :P), maybe something in my gear.
Anonymiss @ Runetotem - Game - World of Warcraft
Problem is: I can't generate a decent amount of thret, what's wrong with my stats?

Question: Has anyone calculated which the next best offset item is to use? (if you can't get your hands on wind stalker leggings of the zephyr)