Galzohar
Try downloading the most recent spreadsheet, and try again.
I'm pretty sure there is no way you can gain more dmg done while reducing the Vampiric Touch to 150 from 200.
The mana regen consumables I can sort of understand in a realistic sense, because it allows you to use flame cap over the mana gem.
I understand that in longer fights, while your dps remains the same, you might oom earlier without the proper mana regen facilities.
So if your dps stayed the same, but your dmg
decreased by having 150 mana from vampiric embrace instead of 200, that would make sense in fights where your dps time is shorter than the encounter duration.
However, unless there is some error within the spreadsheet, I don't think its possible to get better dmg from reducing the amount of mana from vampiric touch.
Are you sure you didn't change the encounter duration as well?
Could you host your modified excel spreadsheet or link some screenshots with the two different results.
Make sure you don't change anything except those two exact variables.
Oh and btw, the 'max' under the build comparison tables is put there in order to point out which of the dps cycles would bring you the most dmg.
If frostbolting brings you more dmg than fireballs and scorch, then the 'max' would go under the frost column.
If you're looking for the amount of time you can dps with a spell, you can find it in 'Spells' table on the main sheet, in the column 'Time'.
Tarrke
Yeah, I think it is a mistake in the spreadsheet calculations though I'm not sure.
If I were to guess. I would think it would have to do with Vontre's initial spreadsheet calculations that did not include different levels of Arcane Blast.
Although I'm speculating, I think that the code should be read like this:
Cell J42
=VLOOKUP($L$40;$L$26:$M$39;2)
Cell L40
It's also possible that this is not a mistake, and was intended to be calculated like that...or another explanation is that the table you mentioned isn't really used in the calculations and was put there as a convenience or simply was added and never removed.
Either way, I hope this helps
