Originally Posted by Gograh
Rupture does indeed deal more damage than eviscerate , better yet with mangle, but locks QQed too much about losing one of their 7 debuff slots (and staying behind the rogues in DPS)... so the CL told us we cant use ruptures and deadly poison anymore.
question is, in a raid with 3 locks and 2 shadow priests (and 3 rogues) rogues should really avoid rupture? those 3 slots we´re not using for rupture will be used for more DPS to the raid?
|
Well you have to find out what debuffs would be on the target and how much damage they do.
If you assume mangle is up, no serrated blades or murder for simplicity, and 2500 raid buffed AP, a 5 point rupture does 130 DPS while it is on the target.
If you're knocking off a warlock dot, find out if that one dot is more than 130 DPS. If it is, total raid damage will be higher if you use evis. Your deadly poison debuff almost certainly does less DPS than your rupture, but it's likely to have better uptime on the target, so depending on your playstyle, it might be better to give up rupture than DP.
We typically field 3 locks and 2 shadow priests, but at least one of the warlocks is destruction (used to be 2 of them, not sure right now as one respecs constantly), so they use fewer slots.
Nobody has complained about their dots getting knocked off, and I use deadly poison and rupture regularly, but we only field 2 rogues, so we are using 4 slots at most for rogue stuff compared to your 6.