 |
06/12/07, 1:02 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
Glass Joe
Human Rogue
Scarlet Crusade
|
I can't say I've ever done specific testing, but in all my time of dpsing as a rogue (which has been longer then I care to recount) I would notice if BF/S&D reduced the global cool down. The answer is no, they do not. Much like the previously listed hunter abilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
06/12/07, 1:34 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Great Tiger
|
Haste rating helps combat latency. Yeah, in a perfect world, 1.5s spells would get no benefit from it. The way things actually work, though, every non-instant spell receives some benefit from haste rating until you get enough that you can cast two 1.5s spells in a 3s period. I have the spell haste ring from BT, and it is certainly having an effect. It's till not enough of an effect, however, to recoup the one global cooldown in ten that I lose to latency. Far from being bad for a Shadow priest, I think spell haste might be one of our absolute best stats - on the level with +damage - if a reasonable amount of it can get you to the point where you can squeeze in an extra spell during a DoT rotation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
06/12/07, 6:11 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
Glass Joe
|
I just recently asked and got answers for some haste-related hunter questions in another forum. Here's a summary of that in case it's useful:
Q: What does haste affect (by shot type)?
auto cast (.5 sec): no
auto cooldown (wpn speed): yes
steady cast (1.5 sec): yes
steady CD (0): n/a
arcance cast (0): n/a
arcane CD (6 or 5 seconds): no
multi cast (.5 sec): no
multi CD (10 sec): no
Q: Does haste reduce +attack-power contribution to damage proportionally to reduced shot interval?
A: no.
For auto-, aimed and multishot, added shot damage per point of AP is a function of weapon speed. But this value does not change when haste effects reduce the shot interval.
|
|
|
|
|
|
06/13/07, 4:57 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
Glass Joe
|
Haste for Melee:
|
Additionally, melee using instant attacks and "on next attack" specials only do not push back their swing timer. As long as you limit yourself to those type of attacks, haste provides full value (or better) for each additional point.
|
Does Backstab or Sinister Strike push back the swing timer? Is it more effective to drink a Haste pot and auto attack for the duration of the buff, or drink the haste pot and spam my yellow attacks?
|
|
|
|
|
|
06/13/07, 5:03 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
Backstab and SS, being instant, do not push back the swing timer. Just like Heroic strike, MS, Bloodthirst, Stormstrike, etc. do not, but Slam does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
06/24/07, 2:35 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
|
Glass Joe
Night Elf Warrior
Andorhal
|
Originally Posted by Xerophyte
Haste and the Warrior
It's worth noting that as haste decreases the cast time of Slam and autoattack by equal proportions, the hidden rage and damage cost of Slam does not increase with haste.
|
Is the effect of haste on the Slam cast time calculated based on your personal Slam cast time determined by talents (0.5 seconds with 2 points and 1 second with 1 point), or does it calculate based on the base cast time of 1.5 seconds regardless of talents?
|
|
|
|
|
|
06/24/07, 4:02 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
|
Thunderstorm!
Draenei Shaman
Dragonblight
|
To recap the math side of things:
21 Haste Rating -> 1% Haste (be it melee, ranged or spell).
Haste increases caster dps by dividing Old Cast Time by New Cast time, while also increasing mana use by the same amount (efficiency/dpm stays the same)
|
Originally Posted by Malan
You forgot: "I'm reposting the same shit that some jackass on the normal forum posted, verbatim, complete with misspelled words, horrible paragraph/line spacing, and half assed ideas that a coked up chimp could have made better."
|
|
|
|
|
06/24/07, 4:17 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
Glass Joe
Night Elf Warrior
Andorhal
|
Originally Posted by Binkenstein
To recap the math side of things:
21 Haste Rating -> 1% Haste (be it melee, ranged or spell).
|
According to http://blue.cardplace.com/newcache/us/106616902.htm, melee haste rating is 10.5:1 and spell haste rating is 21:1.
Is there any information I am unaware of that would contradict this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/11/07, 3:51 AM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
|
Glass Joe
Tauren Shaman
Taerar (EU)
|
Q: is Spell haste calculatet on base-casttime or talented casttime ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/11/07, 5:03 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
|
Thunderstorm!
Draenei Shaman
Dragonblight
|
Talented.
|
Originally Posted by Malan
You forgot: "I'm reposting the same shit that some jackass on the normal forum posted, verbatim, complete with misspelled words, horrible paragraph/line spacing, and half assed ideas that a coked up chimp could have made better."
|
|
|
|
|
07/11/07, 5:07 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
|
Great Tiger
|
Originally Posted by Zotti
Q: is Spell haste calculatet on base-casttime or talented casttime ?
|
Spell haste certainly appears to be based on actual casting time or at the very least that is consistent with every other effect that I can think of. Talents that reduce spell casting time have precedence over all other modifiers to the best of my knowledge.
I do not have access to a testing environment that can produce meaningful data on this however. Between variable latency and a lack of spell haste (worn) items to get a nice dataset the needed sample size would just be obscenely large. I also only have so much faith in the combatlog's priority and when we are looking at fractions of a second, I don't trust it very much at all.
Although I'd be shocked if it were otherwise, this might be worth looking at again once people are sporting quite high haste ratings. For now I'll assume it is post-talented however.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/11/07, 8:35 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
|
Soda Popinski
|
Spell tooltips reflect the amount of haste you have, so this is easy to check with a shaman lusting you.
|
Benefactors' Bar, where you get free English lessons:
Originally Posted by Praetorian
Speaking of mangling English, "wherefore" means why, not where.
So you were saying "why are you beta key" which isn't really very helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
07/13/07, 7:58 AM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
|
Von Kaiser
Tauren Shaman
Tichondrius
|
Melee Haste
|
Haste has no cap for classes who's primary attack is auto-attack. Unlike all other attacks investigated, auto-attack appears to have no internal cast time or cooldown, and thus adding more haste will always increase your actual rate of attack. Additionally, melee using instant attacks and "on next attack" specials only do not push back their swing timer. As long as you limit yourself to those type of attacks, haste provides full value (or better) for each additional point. Note that some gear/enchanting/talent decisions (see above about procs) may make haste more or less effective for specific melee classes.
|
I Wouldn't post this if i was able to get into game and verify it myself but..
Current speculation is that there is a soft cap of 1.0s on swing speeds for weapons despite the fact that the char sheet shows the correct theoretical speed.
This should be quite easily provable right or wrong with a /combatlog using a fast weapon with haste procs. Preferably proof of a weapon swinging twice within a 0.8s window to discount latency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/13/07, 8:14 AM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
Originally Posted by Freyalis
I Wouldn't post this if i was able to get into game and verify it myself but..
Current speculation is that there is a soft cap of 1.0s on swing speeds for weapons despite the fact that the char sheet shows the correct theoretical speed.
This should be quite easily provable right or wrong with a /combatlog using a fast weapon with haste procs. Preferably proof of a weapon swinging twice within a 0.8s window to discount latency.
|
I'm at work, so sadly can't test it either.
But, I "highly" doubt there is a 1s swing speed cap.
Any rogue using [Searing Sunblade], [Warp Splinter's Thorn] or a similar speed dagger wound instantly have run into this cap if they activated Slice & Dice.
|
-= Random Ravings - RSS Feed =- Rogue and Hunter stuff here. As well as guides to get you trough your spare time.
|
|
|
|
07/13/07, 8:18 AM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
|
Bald Bull
Tauren Druid
Al'Akir (EU)
|
Originally Posted by Freyalis
I Wouldn't post this if i was able to get into game and verify it myself but..
Current speculation is that there is a soft cap of 1.0s on swing speeds for weapons despite the fact that the char sheet shows the correct theoretical speed.
This should be quite easily provable right or wrong with a /combatlog using a fast weapon with haste procs. Preferably proof of a weapon swinging twice within a 0.8s window to discount latency.
|
Wow Web Stats
Somehow I doubt there's a cap.
From one points in the gurtogg files:
375 Melde's Melee hits Gurtogg Bloodboil for 255
656 Melde's Melee hits Gurtogg Bloodboil for 474 (glancing)
00:04'23.015 Melde's Melee hits Gurtogg Bloodboil for 275
|
Clearly shows a ~0.65 second gap between offhand hits.
Last edited by dukes : 07/13/07 at 8:24 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/13/07, 1:59 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
|
Von Kaiser
Night Elf Druid
Mannoroth
|
Any thoughts on haste rating for feral druids? It would seem like a pretty poor stat, given the low % of the whole that our white damage does, but I don't know if I'm missing something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/13/07, 4:07 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
|
Bald Bull
Night Elf Rogue
Wrathbringer (EU)
|
If there's a cap (which I highly doubt), it certainly isn't at 1.0s speed.
As Zurgat pointed out, I use the [Searing Sunblade] as my offhand, and already slice and dice puts it to 1.0 speed.
SnD combined with blade flurry makes it 0.83.
|
|
|
|
|
07/17/07, 7:11 AM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
|
Piston Honda
Tauren Druid
Dentarg (EU)
|
Is spellhaste calculated last or first of somewhere in between?
Like lets say you have a spell like regrowth Healing Touch, 3.5sec cast time. A talent that reduces it by 0.5 sec and a proc that can reduce it for another 0.5 sec. If im equipping rating enough for 10% spellhaste now, does that mean its 0.35 sec faster or 0.3 and if it procs is it still 0.35 or 0.3 or 0.25?
I cant seem to find the answer to that question anywhere.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/17/07, 8:09 AM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
|
Glass Joe
Undead Warlock
Frostmourne
|
sigh @ haste rating not affectin DOTs.
Blizz was saying it would be too powerful if it affected DOTs, but how on earth would taking a sec or 2 off an 18 or 24 sec DOT quantify it as too strong?
Pretty sure they couldve just calculated a fair amt of making DOTs tick faster even if it was a tiny effect, so that it would work.
I also sometimes wonder if they're trying to put too much mechanics into game just to keep competitive with other MMORPGs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/20/07, 8:34 AM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
|
Glass Joe
Undead Warrior
Deathwing (EU)
|
Am I missing something, or rather what am I missing here?
The effect grows exponentially to the point where you hit 100% meele haste (1050 haste rating) and with no cap on white attacks you would kill anything instantly (or rather crash the server properly) as you would make an infinite amount of attacks.
I.e. any weapon would do:
Haste / Increase of the base dps of the weapon / relative speed of a 2.7 weapon
0% / 0% / 2.7s
10% / 11,11% / 2.43s
20% / 25% / 2.16s
30% / 42,86% / 1.89s
40% / 66.67% / 1.62s
50% / 100% / 1.35s
60% / 150% / 1.08s
70% / 233,33% / 0.81s
80% / 400% / 0.54s
90% / 900% / 0.27s
99% / 9900% / 0.03s
Currently its possible to get way up there by stacking items with either equipped haste or haste procs. [Dragonstrike] proc + [Dragonspine Trophy] alone adds up to over ~51% haste if both is active at the same time...
Is this right?
Last edited by Fant : 07/20/07 at 8:38 AM.
Reason: Added itemlinks
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/20/07, 8:46 AM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
|
Everyone licks chicken.
Blood Elf Paladin
Azjol-Nerub (EU)
|
You're looking at it wrong, Haste basically works like a percentage increase to the amount of attacks you do in a given time spam, not a percentage reduction in the amount of time between swings. That is, if you have 100% haste, you would be doing twice the attacks in a given time span than if you had no haste at all. 200% haste would be thrice the attacks, etc.
Obviously it does end up reducing the time between swings, but the percentage increase WoW lists is basically the amount of extra attacks you're doing in any equal time span compared to if you had no haste at all.
Last edited by Chicken : 07/20/07 at 9:22 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/20/07, 11:37 AM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
Originally Posted by Fant
Am I missing something, or rather what am I missing here?
The effect grows exponentially to the point where you hit 100% meele haste (1050 haste rating) and with no cap on white attacks you would kill anything instantly (or rather crash the server properly) as you would make an infinite amount of attacks.
I.e. any weapon would do:
Haste / Increase of the base dps of the weapon / relative speed of a 2.7 weapon
0% / 0% / 2.7s
10% / 11,11% / 2.43s
20% / 25% / 2.16s
30% / 42,86% / 1.89s
40% / 66.67% / 1.62s
50% / 100% / 1.35s
60% / 150% / 1.08s
70% / 233,33% / 0.81s
80% / 400% / 0.54s
90% / 900% / 0.27s
99% / 9900% / 0.03s
Currently its possible to get way up there by stacking items with either equipped haste or haste procs. [Dragonstrike] proc + [Dragonspine Trophy] alone adds up to over ~51% haste if both is active at the same time...
Is this right?
|
Haste is calculated as Old Weapon Speed / 1.Haste% = New Weapon Speed. 100% haste will give you double the attacks in a given time span, not server-crashing instant kills. People ask this a fair amount about Flurry, so I'll use that as an example.
Let's say you had a 4.0 speed weapon, because I like math to be neat. With 25% haste under what a lot of people assume is the correct system (i.e. Old Weapon Speed * (1 - Haste%) = New Weapon Speed), that would put you at 3.0.
4.0 Speed = 15 Swings Per Minute
3.0 Speed = 20 Swings Per Minute
20 Swings / 15 Swings = 33% Increase To Swings from 25% Haste
Now, using the correct system, 4.0 / 1.25 = 3.2
4.0 Speed = 15 Swings Per Minute
3.2 Speed = 18.75
18.75 Swings / 15 Swings = 25% Increase To Swings from 25% Haste
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/20/07, 2:31 PM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
|
Glass Joe
|
I want to make sure I understand this right. In another thread pf posted that there were diminishing returns on haste rating:
|
Haste rating does diminish in relative value with each point added, whereas regular % haste modifiers do not have the same relative diminishing return. Simply put, haste rating is additive whereas a haste modifier is multiplicative. Another way of putting it would be 10 haste rating grants you 1% haste at base attack speed, but after say 30% haste worth of haste rating, you still go up by 1% haste, but only gain .77% attack speed instead of 1%.
|
Please go over this with me. As I understand it, the way that you calculate attack speed is (Attack speed modifierX)*(Attack Speed ModifierY)*(Attack Speed ModifierZ...)=Attack speed. Additive Haste rating simply composes one of these attack speed modifiers. The formula for haste rating is always 10.52 haste rating per 1% attack speed. Although it is additive within itself, it always is multiplied by your other attack speed buffs.
Given that a rogue keeps SnD up at all times, they have a base 130% attack speed. At 130% attack speed, 10.52 haste rating (1% haste increase) will make your attack speed (1.3)*(1.01)=131.3%. If you add 10.52 more haste rating during this time period, you will make your attack speed (1.3)*(1.02)=132.6% -- a direct 1% increase in attack speed. I don't mean to be obtuse, but I honestly don't see how haste rating has diminishing returns, unless I have the formula wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/20/07, 3:40 PM
|
#49 (permalink)
|
|
Von Kaiser
Night Elf Druid
Dragonblight
|
The greater your white damage %, the greater the effect of a point of haste rating. Before rage, of course. This means that haste is less effective on druids than other classes. However, since much of the T6 dps non-set items feature haste or armor pen you don't have a lot of choice. The band of devastation beats the ancestral ring of conques | |