Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Class Mechanics

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10/20/07, 9:22 AM   #676
NastyFu
Glass Joe
 
NastyFu
Draenei Shaman
 
Non-US/EU Server
I just talked to an old friend (elemental shaman).
He told me his DPS on 2.3 is 400 DPS lower as on 2.2. He did about 10 test runs on Dr.Boom. It's always the same, 800 DPS on 2.3, 1200 DPS on 2.2. Guys, that scares me....

Offline
Old 10/20/07, 9:32 AM   #677
Inkognito
Glass Joe
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Mazrigos (EU)
TLC is definetly needed to reduce from the gap between 2.2 and 2.3 but i dont think it can buff the dps after 2.3 but will definetly help since u will get more crits, anyway some good news more or less... LO can proc clearcasting or so i head and they fixed the issues with LB and LO doing same dmg because of the LO proc, the stopcasting implemented it feels like its a bit bugged on PTR so the best way to test it is probably on life server, atm is lagging like hell and even though its suposed to help with the lag issues it doesnt, not with more then 600ms atm on PTR is realy lagging badly 1 spell casted every 3sec if not more

Offline
Old 10/20/07, 9:35 AM   #678
Inkognito
Glass Joe
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Mazrigos (EU)
Originally Posted by NastyFu View Post
I just talked to an old friend (elemental shaman).
He told me his DPS on 2.3 is 400 DPS lower as on 2.2. He did about 10 test runs on Dr.Boom. It's always the same, 800 DPS on 2.3, 1200 DPS on 2.2. Guys, that scares me....
I am sure its because its the latency on the PTR this morning i had 1100 dps now with so much lag barely managed 900.. the stopcasting from blizzard its not working properly. The nerf is there but not that big.

Offline
Old 10/20/07, 9:37 AM   #679
Kyuki
Piston Honda
 
Kyuki's Avatar
 
Gnome Mage
 
Emerald Dream (EU)
What to say really, after seeing these last news I jumped on and can only confirm that LO is now a simply 50% cut for the entire spell including spelldmg.
Also what I noticed from when I went on (had a 10 min sample) was that it doesnt seem that the blizzard /stopcasting feature is actually working atm. Anyone else who can confirm or negate this?

Either way my DPS dropped horrendously, and well since I belive the stopcasting feature is not working that may very well be the biggest reason so the whole little test I made doesnt really show how the LO "fix" effected DPS.
Right, can also confirm that regular LBs does not get effected by the LO "debuff" as it seems to be removed in some way. Also I had 0 chain procs during this period.

big sigh though, this looks like a really hard hit to elemental DPS.

Offline
Old 10/20/07, 11:07 AM   #680
Aezoc
Piston Honda
 
Orc Death Knight
 
Scilla
From what I can tell, the Blizz /stopcasting feature seems to be working (although my latency is low this morning, so it's difficult to say for sure). But there's a bug on the PTR currently where trying to cast a spell too early will start a new GCD, which could be what people are seeing. I.e. if you try to cast a new LB 1/10 of a second too early, you'll be unable to cast another for 1.4 seconds after the first one completes.

Offline
Old 10/20/07, 12:14 PM   #681
Franklin
Von Kaiser
 
Blood Elf Mage
 
Khaz'goroth
Math aside whats frustrating me is I've yet to see if the damage nerf in intentional or not, ie. are the developers happy that the damage loss is justified by the additional longevity and threat reduction.

The posts from Eyonix on the official boards this week (WoW Forums -> Eyonix's Shaman is elemental) seemed to indicate that changes could occur - but I've seen a lot of posts like this in the past that either just petter out or come back several weeks later with 'sorry we're happy with how it is now' it would be nice to have this information up front.

Credit must go to the Shaman community for the extensive testing that they have done on this, if they changes do go in it won't be from lack of effort from our side.

Offline
Old 10/20/07, 12:33 PM   #682
Kasi
Soda Popinski
 
Retired
Tauren Death Knight
 
No WoW Account
This stuff is really depressing. I really need to work on my enhancement gear. Blizzard really looks out to kill the spec. Can anyone who is testing on the PTR confirm issues on chain casting LB not giving 20% LO rate, but more like 14%?

Offline
Old 10/20/07, 12:42 PM   #683
Franklin
Von Kaiser
 
Blood Elf Mage
 
Khaz'goroth
From what I understand the proc is lower than 20% because of the theorized 3second 'cooldown' on the overload effect - so when chain casting LB's if you get a proc (and assuming no lag) your next 1-2 LB's have a zero change to proc lightning overload.


Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

Offline
Old 10/20/07, 12:47 PM   #684
Kasi
Soda Popinski
 
Retired
Tauren Death Knight
 
No WoW Account
Well yeah thats what I've been talking about, and many people who've been on the PTR have reported that, but I was wondering what anyone from here had done on tests like that.

Offline
Old 10/20/07, 12:52 PM   #685
Inkognito
Glass Joe
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Mazrigos (EU)
i heard they removed that "cooldown" and now its possible to get a few LO proccing one after another, but that doesnt help us much does it?

Offline
Old 10/20/07, 12:56 PM   #686
Kasi
Soda Popinski
 
Retired
Tauren Death Knight
 
No WoW Account
I've not heard anything about that. From what I've read LO still can't chain proc.

Offline
Old 10/20/07, 12:57 PM   #687
Kyuki
Piston Honda
 
Kyuki's Avatar
 
Gnome Mage
 
Emerald Dream (EU)
Well that would help quite abit actually, but out of curiosity; where did you hear that?

As I said above, earlier today I didnt manage to get a single chain proc from LO during some 10+ mins of testing.

Damn, why could it not stay 50% out of base? Seemed like a logical buff for the tree to me.

Offline
Old 10/20/07, 1:26 PM   #688
Grave-Arygos
Glass Joe
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Arygos
LO is definitely now a straight 50%, no longer just 50% of the base. (of all the things for them to actually change...unbelievable)

LO crits proc an LC electric charge. This made it look like an LO proc off an LO, but it wasn't. In 100's and 100's of casts, I did not see LO proc off itself.


The casting mechanic to remove the need for /stopcasting has definitely changed...it doesn't seem like it's just lag. Something is different than it was yesterday.

Last edited by Grave-Arygos : 10/20/07 at 1:41 PM.

Offline
Old 10/20/07, 1:40 PM   #689
Cabled
Glass Joe
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Kael'thas
Well last night when I was testing I didn't have any lag since hardly anyone was on late in netherstorm. But my average dps on Test was about 1010-1020, with a shadow priest there so misery buff was active. On live my dps was pretty constant at 1050, of course without misery.
On a mana longevity point though, I ran out of mana on live after about 2 minutes each test, while on the test realm the average test was close to 4 minutes long. Thats kind of a big boost.

Offline
Old 10/21/07, 7:39 AM   #690
NastyFu
Glass Joe
 
NastyFu
Draenei Shaman
 
Non-US/EU Server
Meanwhile my shaman arrived on PTR. So I've done testings.

2.2 til oom (~2min)
1100-1200 DPS

2.3 til oom (~3min)
900-1100 DPS

I used TLC btw
I still don't get it... Is there any shaman out there who has mana problems in PvE ?

They clearly designed the elemental shaman to be depeding on shadow priests in PvE and even 2.3 wont change that.

Offline
Old 10/21/07, 6:38 PM   #691
Inkognito
Glass Joe
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Mazrigos (EU)
All i see these days its nerf nerf nerf.. all tests show same thing.. we get nerfed by around 9% overall, anyone knows anything a bit more optimistic? I love to be elemental in raids but after the patch if my dps will so bad, now that the mages are getting buffed the difference will so big will be embarrassing to keep a spot in raids, the only choice is to go resto witch i was for more then 2 years before going elemental.. i realy dont want to go resto again, quit or go resto in pve is not what i expected from blizzard tbh, they are makeing a big mistake.

So, anything optimistic about 2.3 for us elemental shammys?

PS: dont even try to start with the MORE MANA shit i am tired of it.

Offline
Old 10/21/07, 7:22 PM   #692
Kasi
Soda Popinski
 
Retired
Tauren Death Knight
 
No WoW Account
All it is is a fairly weak DPM buff, and to anywhere get close to regaining our old dps we have to go max CL and pot heavy, which kills anything of the gains. It's just a horrible nerf, amounting currently to about 9-10% theoretically and anywhere from 9-15% in testing on the PTR. This is just a complete and total failure on Blizzard's part and god I hope someone there wakes up and fixes this "buff" we're getting.

Offline
Old 10/21/07, 11:54 PM   #693
Binkenstein
mumbo-jumbo-theorycrafter
 
Binkenstein's Avatar
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Khaz'goroth
About the only up side is that with the /stopcasting fix, we should be able to dps a bit more.

Generally, we could match mages for dps (and I've seen a good ele shaman beat mages from time to time), but if we have a 500ms lag, we get 1.5 seconds of lag compared to a mages 1 second, which adds up.

Most of the time we've been looking at lag free hypothetical situations, as well as excess mana, as we've ways to get around both. In the long run the potential dps we could do has been decreased, but we may end up doing more in the long run due to other changes.


New Zealand Offline
Old 10/22/07, 2:49 AM   #694
Kasi
Soda Popinski
 
Retired
Tauren Death Knight
 
No WoW Account
Any buff to stopcasting is not a buff at all because it affects other classes too. It will help mages spamming arcane blast just as much as us. It shouldn't matter how the changes for casting affect us, since they will affect all casters pretty much. And I don't run with 500 ms lag, and I'm sure most here don't as well. I run at 130 to 150 or so. So there will be a much bigger gap between us and other casters. Will it be profitable now to put an elemental in a caster group, when our only buff is 3% hit/crit? Just stick a resto shaman in there who gives a lot more mana back.

What matters is the numbers. Mages are getting their coefficient penalty removed and we are losing 9% dmg off our LB/CL. There is no way we can compete as things stand now. Funny enough enhancement at T6 level tend to beat elemental anyway, so I'm guessing if this goes through a lot of us will be going enhancement. I know I will.

Offline
Old 10/22/07, 3:12 AM   #695
tufy
Don Flamenco
 
tufy's Avatar
 
Nathaira
Draenei Shaman
 
No WoW Account (EU)
Originally Posted by Inkognito View Post
TLC is definetly needed to reduce from the gap between 2.2 and 2.3
TLC won't reduce the gap because in 2.3, LO proc crits can no longer charge it.

Slovenia Offline
Old 10/22/07, 4:26 AM   #696
Daidalos
Great Tiger
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Korgath
Originally Posted by Binkenstein View Post
About the only up side is that with the /stopcasting fix, we should be able to dps a bit more.

Generally, we could match mages for dps (and I've seen a good ele shaman beat mages from time to time), but if we have a 500ms lag, we get 1.5 seconds of lag compared to a mages 1 second, which adds up.

Most of the time we've been looking at lag free hypothetical situations, as well as excess mana, as we've ways to get around both. In the long run the potential dps we could do has been decreased, but we may end up doing more in the long run due to other changes.
If you look at the mage calculations done by vontre in the mage thread as well as what current warlocks do even before the stopcasting fix I don't see how we could ever match that dps on a single target with 0 lag and the best items out of BT/hyjal. I don't really think we should be able to out dps a mage or a lock but the gap seems very wide atm.

Last edited by Daidalos : 10/22/07 at 5:28 AM.

Offline
Old 10/22/07, 5:46 AM   #697
Binkenstein
mumbo-jumbo-theorycrafter
 
Binkenstein's Avatar
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Khaz'goroth
I'm more looking at the fact that an ele shaman and a fire mage have 2 second and 3 second nukes respectivly.

With 500ms lag, every minute we'd get 24 casts to their 17
With the change, we'd get 30 to their 20, an increase of 6 over our previous figure, and 10 more than them (where in 2.2 it would be 7). This is why I think Blizzards early testing showed a boost, along with that LO damage "bug", and why I think that stopcasting change will do more for us than mages/locks


New Zealand Offline
Old 10/22/07, 6:00 AM   #698
Nennx
Von Kaiser
 
Human Warlock
 
Sargeras
Originally Posted by tufy View Post
TLC won't reduce the gap because in 2.3, LO proc crits can no longer charge it.
Are you sure about this?

When I tried it on the PTR yesterday (Saturday) TLC was proccing off of LO crits. Do you have any SSs to disprove this?

Offline
Old 10/22/07, 6:03 AM   #699
Binkenstein
mumbo-jumbo-theorycrafter
 
Binkenstein's Avatar
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Khaz'goroth
Originally Posted by Nennx View Post
Are you sure about this?

When I tried it on the PTR yesterday (Saturday) TLC was proccing off of LO crits. Do you have any SSs to disprove this?
I'd suggest getting screenshots showing it procing off a LB hit/LO Crit. Easier to prove something than disprove it.


New Zealand Offline
Old 10/22/07, 6:18 AM   #700
Kirion
Don Flamenco
 
Kirion's Avatar
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Deathwing (EU)
Originally Posted by tufy View Post
TLC won't reduce the gap because in 2.3, LO proc crits can no longer charge it.
And poster 5 posts above you says it can.

Too much misinformation and rumors without actual testing in this thread. We really need to figure all aspects of new Lighting Overload and then ask devs if its working as intended and how about some dps buffs.

42.

Russia Offline
 

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Class Mechanics

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Shaman] Elemental benchmarks Levaraa Class Mechanics 22 09/11/07 10:03 AM
How viable are elemental Shaman in PvE? Patamon Public Discussion 1 06/27/07 2:30 PM
[Shaman]Elemental Itemization VinnieJones The Dung Heap 2 06/13/07 3:15 PM
Shaman: Elemental Shields Sherriffroot Public Discussion 1 02/08/07 8:53 PM
Shaman Duel Wield dps spreadsheet (yet another shaman thread, sorry) Skiace Public Discussion 2 09/27/06 11:31 PM