Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Class Mechanics

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03/08/08, 4:30 PM   #7776
poofypajamas
Glass Joe
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Lightning's Blade
You want to know if the crit rating of mongoose would not be as helpful as the armor penetration on executioner... how could we possibly know for you unless we extensively researched your character, something which no one wants to do, GO USE YO'S

Offline
Old 03/08/08, 4:31 PM   #7777
automatica
Glass Joe
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Medivh
Originally Posted by Kahdrick View Post
On most fights, it's true that the speed doesn't matter for purposes of mana regen because we just get so much mana back, but on some - Zul'Jin for example, where I'm doing a crapton of off-healing and don't necessarily get to just melee dps for the entire duration of SR, knowing that I can swap in faster weapons to get back more mana while I *can* dps will make a big difference. I would however like those weapons to be as slow as possible while still maximizing the mana gained so that my dps doesn't suffer too much... thus it would be nice to know what the actual PPM rate of SR is.
The only time you should find yourself healing on ZJ would be during lynx phase when he focuses on cloth wearers. I'll pop a PVP mana potion if necessary and use SR around 27% to get back to full in that 7%. If you're doing more healing than this, you should have a talk with your healers. =)

Offline
Old 03/08/08, 4:50 PM   #7778
automatica
Glass Joe
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Medivh
Originally Posted by e30Birdy View Post
I have read it 500 times and wanted to know from peoples personal experience

i know that mongoose is vialble to a point and after that more crit doesnt give you as much benifit as would stacking armor pen!
From the OP:

[Enchant Weapon - Executioner] is roughly equivalent at high T5/T6 levels of gearing to a single enchant of Mongoose. However, Mongoose/Executioner or double Executioner will not outperform the dps benefit of double Mongoose unless the Enhancement Shaman is geared with nearly unobtainable values of Armor Penetration.

Offline
Old 03/08/08, 7:29 PM   #7779
Malayka
Glass Joe
 
Troll Shaman
 
Duskwood
So a guildy, an enhance shaman, came to me with a problem. He was hitting 600 DPS in T 4 gear, but upwards edge of it. he felt he should be hitting higher, so he asked for suggestions. I gave them.

Anyway, he came later, and said he'd found another problem. He needed more hit rating! (He's currently at 109)

being the theorycrack child that I am, I laughed, and said no way, look at the EJ thread again. But he replied that it seemed wrong, that he was missing 30+% of his attacks, if you removed talents. So I decided to go to WWS to disprove it.

And I ran through a bunch of parses, looked at gear, and realized that I could see no other conclusion.

Either shaman's base miss % was 32%, or something wasn't working.



Anyone know what's up with this? Disprove me, please.

Offline
Old 03/08/08, 7:57 PM   #7780
falonub
Banned
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Ysondre
I'm having a little separate weird problem with yo!'s simulator, and I'm not sure why.

AEP values:
AP = 1
Hit = 1.67
Haste = 1.74
Armor Pen = 0.33
Strength = 2.2
Agility = 1.71
Expertise 3.24


My problem lies in that I was re-evaluating my two trinkets. One is DST of course, but for the second one I was running yo!'s sim to compare madness vs berserker's call since I have both. I put Berserker's Call at 130aep(added to my base AP in the sim) to account for if I use it late etc etc. This is the math I got with madness: (84+ (20*1.67) + (2.4*10/60*300*0.33) = 156.6 so for my values madness is ~26+ AEP higher than berserker. So I ran the sim using both and even though madness results in a higher single AEP value; the projected DPS is about ~20 lower compared to Berserker's. I'm a little puzzled. Am I hitting a retard block and not realizing it or?

Offline
Old 03/08/08, 9:57 PM   #7781
Yo!
Piston Honda
 
Yo!'s Avatar
 
Orc Shaman
 
Страж Смерти (EU)
Originally Posted by falonub View Post
So I ran the sim using both and even though madness results in a higher single AEP value; the projected DPS is about ~20 lower compared to Berserker's.
Only proc part of trinkets is being modelled. You have to input passive stats directly. The reason for this is that if you already have it equipped - those passive stats are already represented in the paperdoll.

Offline
Old 03/08/08, 10:31 PM   #7782
LazyJoe
Von Kaiser
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Sinstralis (EU)
Originally Posted by Malayka View Post
So a guildy, an enhance shaman, came to me with a problem. He was hitting 600 DPS in T 4 gear, but upwards edge of it. he felt he should be hitting higher, so he asked for suggestions. I gave them.

Anyway, he came later, and said he'd found another problem. He needed more hit rating! (He's currently at 109)

being the theorycrack child that I am, I laughed, and said no way, look at the EJ thread again. But he replied that it seemed wrong, that he was missing 30+% of his attacks, if you removed talents. So I decided to go to WWS to disprove it.

And I ran through a bunch of parses, looked at gear, and realized that I could see no other conclusion.

Either shaman's base miss % was 32%, or something wasn't working.



Anyone know what's up with this? Disprove me, please.
As any dual-wielding class, shamans have a 28% base miss rate against a boss (9% miss rate + 19% dual-wield penalty).

So you're stating the parses you looked into are rather showing a miss rate equivalent to 32% bass miss rate ? (You are not very clear on this point).

There may be many explanations : a streak of bad luck (can definitely happen unless you have a very big parse of a few hundred hours of boss fights), or maybe the miss rate on your parse includes dodges. There may also be external factors like debuff lowering your chance to hit (Attumen comes to mind) or getting disarmed and hitting with a non-capped competence

Offline
Old 03/09/08, 3:16 AM   #7783
suicidalkatt
Glass Joe
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Kilrogg
Totem tossing?

Is it possible to use both Stonebreaker's Totem and Totem of Astral Winds by making a macro that would swap Stonebreaker's in before casting a shock spell and switch back to Astral winds?

All attempts i've made simply swap the items and have an occational shock pop out.

Any ideas? and if it were possible would it be beneficial?

Last edited by suicidalkatt : 03/09/08 at 3:21 AM.

Offline
Old 03/09/08, 3:41 AM   #7784
Malayka
Glass Joe
 
Troll Shaman
 
Duskwood
Originally Posted by LazyJoe View Post
As any dual-wielding class, shamans have a 28% base miss rate against a boss (9% miss rate + 19% dual-wield penalty).

So you're stating the parses you looked into are rather showing a miss rate equivalent to 32% bass miss rate ? (You are not very clear on this point).

There may be many explanations : a streak of bad luck (can definitely happen unless you have a very big parse of a few hundred hours of boss fights), or maybe the miss rate on your parse includes dodges. There may also be external factors like debuff lowering your chance to hit (Attumen comes to mind) or getting disarmed and hitting with a non-capped competence
28? I always thought it was 24.

And the fights I used were Illidan (4 of them) and Void Reaver (once)

yes, it looked like people were having a 32% miss rate.

Offline
Old 03/09/08, 4:15 AM   #7785
Atren
Piston Honda
 
Orc Shaman
 
Shattered Halls (EU)
Most likely parsing included dodges, also a stupid question probably: is his weapon skill maxed? :P

Offline
Old 03/09/08, 5:19 AM   #7786
Simian LeSinge
Glass Joe
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Scarshield Legion (EU)
Originally Posted by suicidalkatt View Post
...a macro that would swap Stonebreaker's in before casting a shock spell and switch back to Astral winds?
The big problem is that switching relic slot resets the swing timer, so it will dramatically reduce your white damage.

Offline
Old 03/09/08, 5:29 AM   #7787
suicidalkatt
Glass Joe
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Kilrogg
Originally Posted by Simian LeSinge View Post
The big problem is that switching relic slot resets the swing timer, so it will dramatically reduce your white damage.
Alright so screw my idea :P i'm deciding to stick with Stone for raiding

Offline
Old 03/09/08, 5:44 AM   #7788
Simian LeSinge
Glass Joe
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Scarshield Legion (EU)
For situations where I'm severely aggro-limited, I don't shock at all.
In those situations I really wish I'd put the effort in to farm MT for astral winds...

Offline
Old 03/09/08, 6:01 AM   #7789
Paradox
Von Kaiser
 
Paradox's Avatar
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Magtheridon
Originally Posted by Simian LeSinge View Post
For situations where I'm severely aggro-limited, I don't shock at all.
In those situations I really wish I'd put the effort in to farm MT for astral winds...
Rank 1 shocks?

Offline
Old 03/09/08, 7:59 AM   #7790
Aeolian
No.
 
Aeolian's Avatar
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Skywall
Originally Posted by Simian LeSinge View Post
For situations where I'm severely aggro-limited, I don't shock at all.
In those situations I really wish I'd put the effort in to farm MT for astral winds...

Just use Flame Shock in this situation. Let it tick for the entire duration and then reapply it. The initial shock is rather weak compared to the others and the dot is very unlikely to pull aggro unless there is a complete aggro reset during the fight. And honestly I can not think of any fight that you would be so limited that you could not use a single shock.

United States Offline
Old 03/09/08, 11:04 AM   #7791
panny
Bald Bull
 
panny's Avatar
 
Orc Shaman
 
Barthilas
Originally Posted by Aeolian View Post
Just use Flame Shock in this situation. Let it tick for the entire duration and then reapply it. The initial shock is rather weak compared to the others and the dot is very unlikely to pull aggro unless there is a complete aggro reset during the fight. And honestly I can not think of any fight that you would be so limited that you could not use a single shock.
Wha? Flame Shock is higher DPS if CoE or Imp. Scorch are up. Rank 1 shocks are the best solution.


Offline
Old 03/09/08, 1:39 PM   #7792
Aeolian
No.
 
Aeolian's Avatar
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Skywall
Well looking at the post I replied to, the point was using a different totem, understandably its a chance to proc mechanism, but for me it will proc almost instantly when the ICD is up. Granted not every time, but the majority of the time. My point was not to waste time using Rank 1 shocks if he is using Stonebreaker's and just use max rank flame shock every 10-12 seconds. The overall impact damage from Flame Shock is not dramatic enough to pull unless you are above the tank in threat already, and the tick is generally 200ish raid buffed.

From the OP:

Conclusion: The Stonebreaker totem should be superior to the Totem of Astral Winds on average if the shaman can shock at least once every 14 seconds. Note that Stonebreaker has a 10 second hidden cooldown.
At any rate, if you are threat capped to the point that you cant even flame shock you have bigger problems then what totem you are using. May want to consider replacing a tank. I can't think of fight that I am in a position I can't even use one shock. To each their own though, if you are in a position that you can't use a single max rank shocks, then Rank 1 would be the way to go to keep Stonebreaker's rolling.

United States Offline
Old 03/09/08, 2:37 PM   #7793
Lumb
Von Kaiser
 
Lumb's Avatar
 
Orc Shaman
 
Sunstrider (EU)
Hi, i'm pretty sure I already know the answer to this but..

A new rogue recruit to the guild that i'm in is claiming that GoA gives sword specced rogues better personal dps than windfury does, and the fact that the shaman also benefits from it means it benefits the overall raid dps even more. I am pretty sure he is wrong, but can I get some clarification on this because as far as I know windfury totem did get 'hotfixed' (nerfed) not so long ago?

Also

This is the group setup I am usually part of during 25 man raids

1x Enhancement Shaman
2x Sword Rogues
1x Fury warrior
1x Feral druid (usually the OT)

Now, he is also claiming that GoA would be better in this situation, but I am 90% sure he is wrong.

Could anybody shed some light?

Offline
Old 03/09/08, 2:46 PM   #7794
Shiyo
Von Kaiser
 
Shiyo's Avatar
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Gurubashi
From my experience, if you're not twisting, the windfury totem isn't good as instant poison and GoA. Flametongue is even better than instant poison if the target has CoE and Scorch, but that would take away your ability to searing totem if you prefer that.

Offline
Old 03/09/08, 2:53 PM   #7795
Illundai
Bald Bull
 
Illundai's Avatar
 
Orc Death Knight
 
Talnivarr (EU)
I can't believe people still think that nonsense.

Offline
Old 03/09/08, 3:29 PM   #7796
Myul
Don Flamenco
 
Myul's Avatar
 
Dwarf Hunter
 
Eredar (EU)
You feral will love you, your dps will be slightly higher - but your fury will lose about TWENTY PERCENT of his dps. Sword rogues raiding instances above karazhan will see slightly more dps from windfury totem with a small scale to dual legendary max hit 4 piece t6 rogues.

Simple math:
Rogue stay allmost same dps with both totems, about 1.000 dps.
Fury drives 1.000 dps without goa.
You drive 800 dps without goa.
Feral drive 800 dps without goa (while not tanking).

Run Yo! simulator, see the benefit from goa and run a spreadsheet for your feral.

GoA is only a good choice if your fury is a slacker (lack of gear/skill -> lack of damage) or your feral need max avoidance as an offtank (eg gruul).

Offline
Old 03/09/08, 3:41 PM   #7797
Simian LeSinge
Glass Joe
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Scarshield Legion (EU)
The rank one shock suggestion to keep up Stonebreakers when on high threat is very helpful. Thank you.

Offline
Old 03/09/08, 3:52 PM   #7798
Sandron
Glass Joe
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Alterac Mountains
Originally Posted by Lumb View Post
Hi, i'm pretty sure I already know the answer to this but..

A new rogue recruit to the guild that i'm in is claiming that GoA gives sword specced rogues better personal dps than windfury does, and the fact that the shaman also benefits from it means it benefits the overall raid dps even more. I am pretty sure he is wrong, but can I get some clarification on this because as far as I know windfury totem did get 'hotfixed' (nerfed) not so long ago?

Also

This is the group setup I am usually part of during 25 man raids

1x Enhancement Shaman
2x Sword Rogues
1x Fury warrior
1x Feral druid (usually the OT)

Now, he is also claiming that GoA would be better in this situation, but I am 90% sure he is wrong.

Could anybody shed some light?
He is wrong.
WF benefits him and the war more than goa.
as for the druid, sure he doesnt see any benefit from WF but in all honesty, hes there to buff the rogues and the rest of the group


also just wanted to say that the original post is a great tool. Found exactly what i was looking for in less than 2 minutes.
keep up the good work

Offline
Old 03/10/08, 12:53 AM   #7799
Tambard
Von Kaiser
 
Orc Death Knight
 
Zul'Jin
I was curious as to whether or not anyone had considered the [Hand of Justice]. I've been thinking about running into BRD and grabbing one to check the proc rate, but I figured I'd check here first to see if anyone had thought about it or tried it out... Or happened to have any numbers at all regarding this trinket.

Offline
Old 03/10/08, 5:43 AM   #7800
Mindrila
Von Kaiser
 
Draenei Shaman
 
Aegwynn (EU)
Originally Posted by Tambard View Post
I was curious as to whether or not anyone had considered the [Hand of Justice]. I've been thinking about running into BRD and grabbing one to check the proc rate, but I figured I'd check here first to see if anyone had thought about it or tried it out... Or happened to have any numbers at all regarding this trinket.
Well I don't have any numbers, but I have the trinket, it seemed to have an horrible procrate so it's gathering all the dust of my bank now. But perhaps I can get some numbers with procmeter or something like that.

Offline
 

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » Class Mechanics

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Shaman] Elemental v. Enhance - balance QQ thread mek Class Mechanics 1 04/09/07 5:33 PM
Pally blessing priority for an enhance shaman? discofiend Public Discussion 31 10/05/06 11:47 PM