 |
04/05/08, 9:03 AM
|
#316
|
|
Glass Joe
|
Originally Posted by testthewest
Honestly: You wearing T6 4pieces already shows that you are not maxing your dps.
I guess we are trying here to solve a mathematical problem the scientific way, not parsing some "expieriences".
|
I'm not sure why you said this considering I have 4 set bonus t6 and still have better stats than you...(Maybe you shouldn't make comments like that when your gear leaves much to be desired.)
|
|
|
|
|
04/05/08, 11:11 AM
|
#317
|
|
Bald Bull
Raut
Tauren Shaman
No WoW Account (EU)
|
Originally Posted by Daler
No offense, but if you're not experienced at twisting, then you're probably not the best subject to base conclusions on which spec is superior. As it's been said, though, it's personal preference, and resto if you're inexperienced at twisting is almost undoubtedly better.
|
Oh, I wouldn't say that. I can't maintain a perfect spell rotation and still have mana issues. This will only get worse the better I optimize my rotation. Thus I feel I'm in the clear when I make such a statement.
It's just beating the rotten horse corpse that's been laying around for a while.
|
Fuel for hatred
|
|
|
04/05/08, 11:33 AM
|
#318
|
|
Mr. Sandman
Orc Death Knight
Arathor (EU)
|
Originally Posted by Madstabber
I have 4 set bonus t6
|
If you dont want to theorycraft, dont come to a theorycrafting forum, we care little for expereince unless it has been done in a proper and systematic manner. We arent bothered about the gear people wear, though if they are doing obviously dumb things with their gear we will tend to ignore their comments. Good gear doesnt give you more authority in a thread based around math and simulation.
In short, the fact you have better gear doesnt mean that what you have to say if of greater value in this thread, infact from the fact you are wearing 4piece T6 we are less likely to pay any attention to your comments than the person you tried to belittle.
Last edited by Wraithlin : 04/05/08 at 11:46 AM.
|
I'm a card-carrying Nazi and I take offense at your suggestion that there was a holocaust. Too bad I can't tell who's a Jew here or I'd ban all of you.
Greetings,
Hitlerbel
|
|
|
|
04/05/08, 7:55 PM
|
#319
|
|
Glass Joe
|
Originally Posted by Wraithlin
If you dont want to theorycraft, dont come to a theorycrafting forum, we care little for expereince unless it has been done in a proper and systematic manner. We arent bothered about the gear people wear, though if they are doing obviously dumb things with their gear we will tend to ignore their comments. Good gear doesnt give you more authority in a thread based around math and simulation.
In short, the fact you have better gear doesnt mean that what you have to say if of greater value in this thread, infact from the fact you are wearing 4piece T6 we are less likely to pay any attention to your comments than the person you tried to belittle.
|
I think you misunderstood my post, my point was that someone shouldn't be talking about gear when this thread is about ele/enhc vs resto/enhc.
|
|
|
|
|
04/09/08, 12:04 PM
|
#320
|
|
Bald Bull
|
Originally Posted by Binkenstein
Random Thought: Rather than suggest various builds, run them through the sim, and then say "this one is better", maybe we (by we I mean you guys, because I'm not much of an Enh TC type) use the base stats (0/45/0) then add single points, and run the sim again.
This way we'd be able to have a "This talent is worth X dps per point for our base stats/build." Then we can solve a concussion + reverb + nature's guidance + call of flame equation to find the highest dps gain. It could quite possibly come back to the 3/45/13 build, but there would be more "proof" for it than random selection & testing.
Test examples on top of the standard 45 Enh points:
1-5 Concussion
5 Concussion, 5 filler points (as CoF is calculated seperately)
5 Concussion, 1-5 Reverberation
1-3 Nature's guidance (with 10 filler points)
|
Going through the thread to collect all the rationale for Malan's write up, I noticed this. Now that Yo's sim does accomodate single points of each elem talent (Concussion, CoF, Reverb), would this still be worthwhile?
|
|
|
|
|
04/09/08, 12:32 PM
|
#321
|
|
Mike Tyson
Malan
Tauren Shaman
No WoW Account
|
Might be, if someone has the spare cpu cycles. Might at least verify our rationale.
|
|
|
|
|
04/09/08, 5:08 PM
|
#322
|
|
Bald Bull
|
Hmm. I'm done with NG, CoF, and Concussion (along with the three spec options and the baseline), but when testing Reverb point by point, I'm getting some very odd results. As an aside, expect a ghetto .xls sometime soon with the combined testing results, Malan.
With only 1 point in reverb, I'm taking the FLOOR(120/(6-0.2*n),1), where n = # of points in Reverberation, and using that as the number of shocks per 2 minutes. Additionally, I'm selecting the number of points in Reverberation from the drop down list.
I have no idea why, but the DPS output is decreasing from the baseline (not a single thing else was altered, double and triple checked).
Any idea what's going on? Yo, if you're reading, can you chime in?
|
|
|
|
|
04/10/08, 9:39 AM
|
#323
|
|
Mike Tyson
Malan
Tauren Shaman
No WoW Account
|
What happens if you don't select Reverb in the drop down list, can you just increase the number of shocks per 2 min? We need to know if the sim is actually checking to see if you enter more shocks then is possible over the 2 minutes or if Yo is actually modeling the shock cooldown using the Reverb selection.
|
|
|
|
|
04/10/08, 11:22 AM
|
#324
|
|
Bald Bull
|
There's definitely something screwy going on. I just used the default values Yo's sim pops up with, and set the shocks to 20 to get a baseline. After that, I selected 5/5 reverberation, changed nothing else, and noticed an approximate 25 dps decrease, despite changing no stat value, no buff, and keeping the shocks constant at 20 per 2 mins.
The reverse case didn't affect the DPS though. I set shocks to 24, deselected Reverberation (0/5), and got the same DPS as the initial baseline. So I'm assuming there's a check against the number of shocks input, but I'm not certain how the drop down list is working at this point.
On the bright side, Concussion and CoF seemed to be working as expected during my testing yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
04/10/08, 11:38 AM
|
#325
|
|
Mike Tyson
Malan
Tauren Shaman
No WoW Account
|
Sounds like he's actually trying to apply the change to the shock cooldown and then taking that into account with the number of shocks that you said you do in 2 minutes. ie, if you say 20 in 2 min and take 5/5 Reverb, he does a function that adds 4 shocks to the timespan. Since you're getting a decrease my hunch is that he's got a sign error in the code and is probably decreasing the number of shocks done instead of increasing them.
I just did the same test and got the same results. Sim reported a 30 DPS loss just from setting 5/5 reverb.
And he is definitely limiting the number of shocks you can perform in 2 min if you don't select Reverb. Using all default options and setting shocks to 24 results in the same DPS values as using 20 shocks.
|
|
|
|
|
04/12/08, 5:36 AM
|
#326
|
|
King Hippo
Tauren Shaman
Wildhammer (EU)
|
Reverbation eat last tick of flame shock in Yo's sim.
|
Slow, slower, shaman weapon.
|
|
|
04/24/08, 3:06 PM
|
#327
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
Some WWStats from my guild's latest efforts in Brutallus of Sunwell Plateau.
21st April, after our 4th try on brutallus i swapped back to elemental 16/enhancement 45 spec (my current one) and i believe i did better dps. The lack of curse of recklessness and absence at some tries of retribution paladin really affected melee dps alot.
Wow Web Stats
22nd April, almost all possible melee buffs on me and most debuffs on brutallus. We seldom had fairy fire as our druid was very busy healing burnt people. We were all very sad to wipe at 28k hp left of brutalus, seems some casters didn't use as they were told, the destruction potions and all possible elixirs/flasks they should have used  .
Wow Web Stats (my dps must be higher as i don't see searing totem dps added at all, unlike 21st April's WWStats)
I am posting these WWStats links to show the elemental 16/ enhancement 45 talent set DPS possibilities.
You can see this spec (pretty common) here. Voskopoula <Sons of Temujin> Kazzak. I expect to do more dps at next tries as I have acquired tier6 bracers and thus i am able to use Midnight chestguard over Tier6 chest. I do believe some dps more can be pulled out in average  .
At all fights i totem twisted with the rotation in 10seconds of [Stormstrike-Flameshock-Totemtwist-Earthshock], except the first tries where i was testing as Enhancement/restoration talent set.
Last edited by beetlejuice : 04/24/08 at 3:14 PM.
Reason: adding searing totem dmg issue
|
|
|
|
|
04/26/08, 6:24 AM
|
#328
|
|
Von Kaiser
|
Here is what I found using Yo!s sim
Crazy Shaman's DPS & AEP calculator (c) Yo
Using this sim and my personal stats I came out with an average dps of 1370 for 2/45/14 and 1397 for 16/45/0. My stats were as follows:
Str - 299
Agi - 341
Weapon DPS - 97.5/96.5
Haste - 0
Hit - 9.13% (this is pre talents, so 15.13% ele and 18.13 resto)
Crit - 30.37%
AP - 1546
MH/OH Expertise 10 (equals a 2 rating, but the sim doesn't want the rating number)
Armor Pen - 427
For other sections I have crusader on my OH (yes I am cheap), no meta (I need a better helm as I am currently using the one from ZA), Crusade for trinket 1 and abacus for trinket 2. Average number of shocks was 18 as resto and 24 as elemental. In the buffs/debuffs the only things I changed is I put drums to 2 and I put the potion to none.
So as you can see from the sim it shows ele is higher dps, although only by 27dps at my gear level. HOWEVER this assumes you can attack a mob (aka be in melee range) 100% of the time. In most battles you have to move away, but your searing totem will still be in range and you can often still shock the boss. Due to the fact that ele increases the damage that you do while away from the boss (something that sims don't account for) that is probably why in-game I saw closer to a 50-75dps increase when I was ele vs resto. Sadly I do not have the WWS reports showing the sudden increase in dps, but it was noticeable and people in the raid even commented on it (I know not worth much here where it's all about proving the data and words without spreadsheets or in game data don't "prove" anything). I would love to test it out more in 2 different raids but I have moved out of the states and can no longer raid with my guild on a regular basis.
|
|
|
|
04/26/08, 10:00 AM
|
#329
|
|
Soda Popinski
Sebudai
Orc Hunter
No WoW Account
|
Every time I see someone posting a WWS in attempt to lend support to the viability of enh/ele over enh/resto I'm just going to post my own WWS: Wow Web Stats
Both of our parses are anecdotal and essentially meaningless. I'm all for attempting to prove which spec is best, but please go about it the right way.
|
|
|
|
|
04/28/08, 12:29 PM
|
#330
|
|
Bald Bull
|
Originally Posted by beetlejuice
I am posting these WWStats links to show the elemental 16/ enhancement 45 talent set DPS possibilities.
|
I thought we covered this before. To be blunt, no one cares about your WWS. We're interested in testing in controlled environments. Each person's WWS will have too many variables that we can't control (e.g., # of bloodlusts, # of drums, presence of a ret paladin).
And since Sebudai's WWS is showing the DPS possibilities of the enh/resto spec of up to 300ish more DPS, does that mean it's superior?
|
|
|
|
|
|