|
Originally Posted by Malan
|
Originally Posted by berg
I think that if your shaman are not even considering healing that they will have little value to your raid. Stopping to heal someone who is going to die will result in much more dps raid wide than mindlessly spamming stormstrike while watching tv in the background. The only shaman that will ever dominate dps meters are the bad ones, I strongly believe this.
|
But I said nowhere that we were expecting to dominate meters. Meters are for selfish people, damage is damage. Thats my take. And I never said we weren't considering healing at all - just that we are finally able to expand our role on a raid some. And yes, stopping to heal someone that's dying is exactly what we'd be doing.
|
Meters may be for selfish people, but it is the most visible standard for judging effectiveness. All those min/max people will see a mage doing 1.3X or more damage than a shaman going full DPS and say "WTF, we should have another mage instead of his gimp ass!". At the same time, we can frequently top effective healing in full resto mode, but we have a LOT less mana than the other classes in a short time either way. The min/max crowd can't
measure utility effectively and as such we have to use subjective and anecdotal evidence to suggest that a utility talent/ability + our healing or damage is better than adding X class instead. Since the heals stand out more, we are asked to heal.
I think a mixture of healing and damage is great fun, but raid leaders rarely seem to have justification for a non-specialist. What's your current warlock/mage ratio?