 |
04/03/07, 1:11 PM
|
#1976
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
Originally Posted by Antiphonal
while I kited the other one around the room Faxmonkey-style. I have a 10/0/51 spec with a full kiting package (Permafrost, shorter cooldown on CoC, etc...).
|
You can kite the mele adds with slow as well. It's far less mana efficient, but it works. Esp if you get a rogue with crip poison on your add too...really just need one slow then.
|
|
|
|
|
04/03/07, 1:27 PM
|
#1977
|
|
Piston Honda
|
Originally Posted by Drauk
The "1% more dps" is where mistake lies. Let's see.
Frostbolt (frost to make math easier) deals 2k damage on average, we have 0 spellhit and baseline crit, say 6%. Over 100 casts against boss we have
6 crits = 6*4000=24 000 damage
77 hits = 77*2000 = 154 000 damage
Total 178 000 damage or 1780 average frostbolt hit, adjusted for hit/crit values.
Lets increase our crit chance by 1%.
7 crits = 6*4000=28 000 damage
76 hits = 77*2000 = 152 000 damage
Total 180 000 damage or 1800 average frostbolt hit, adjusted for hit/crit values.
Increase by 20 damage, or 20/1780~1.23%. It it also obvious that more hit/crit you have, the less is the impact of adding more.
|
My mistake, it had been a while since I dug into the math and I mis-stated the effects. What 1% hit actually gives you is an increase in your average-damage-per-cast by 1% of your average non-crit, which is exactly what your math (and mine, now that I found it) shows.
I wouldn't characterize it as diminishing marginal returns though. In your example, adding another 1% would increase the average by another 20, i.e. constant marginal returns.
|
|
|
|
|
04/03/07, 1:30 PM
|
#1978
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
Originally Posted by Vontre
*sudden realization*
|
Would you consider adding an AB*X Fireball*2 rotation to your spreadsheet?  Pretty please?
|
|
|
|
|
04/03/07, 1:47 PM
|
#1979
|
|
Do Not Stand In The Wizards
Gnome Mage
Cenarion Circle
|
Originally Posted by Stein
Would you consider adding an AB*X Fireball*2 rotation to your spreadsheet?  Pretty please?
|
Now why didn't I think of that before....
Consider it done. But eventually you'll have to do scorch anyway to maintain debuff...
So I guess I could average the two to get a good estimate. A rotation of rotations! My god...
|
www.magegraf.com
Raiding is full of challenge. Sometimes there is fire. You have to not be in the fire.
|
|
|
04/03/07, 1:57 PM
|
#1980
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
Originally Posted by Vontre
A rotation of rotations! My god...
|
*grins wickedly* It's true, you have to refresh periodically....IF you don't have a fire mage to leech scorch debuffs from.
|
|
|
|
|
04/03/07, 2:12 PM
|
#1981
|
|
Do Not Stand In The Wizards
Gnome Mage
Cenarion Circle
|
Originally Posted by Stein
*grins wickedly* It's true, you have to refresh periodically....IF you don't have a fire mage to leech scorch debuffs from.
|
Holy crap this cycle is fucking sick. Does it actually work with improved fireball?
|
www.magegraf.com
Raiding is full of challenge. Sometimes there is fire. You have to not be in the fire.
|
|
|
04/03/07, 2:20 PM
|
#1982
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
Originally Posted by Vontre
Holy crap this cycle is fucking sick. Does it actually work with improved fireball?
|
Yes; quite well. I've found it to be the most comfortable of all the cycles I've tried.
AB*2 Fireball*3 is also my favorite bloodlust cycle.
Last edited by Stein : 04/03/07 at 2:23 PM.
Reason: add bloodlust comment
|
|
|
|
|
04/03/07, 2:25 PM
|
#1983
|
|
King Hippo
Leito
Troll Rogue
No WoW Account
|
2x(ab/fbx2) + (ab/fb/scorchx2) would keep it refreshed.
|
Rogue at heart.
|
|
|
04/03/07, 3:02 PM
|
#1984
|
|
Do Not Stand In The Wizards
Gnome Mage
Cenarion Circle
|
Originally Posted by Leto
2x(ab/fbx2) + (ab/fb/scorchx2) would keep it refreshed.
|
This is how I'm doing it, but the distinction is not transparent. It actually has a noticeable decrease in overall dps.
Edit: Nevermind, I'm not going to model the second tier of cycling. Just going with fbx2, i'd have to make too many changes to the cycle tables.
Last edited by Vontre : 04/03/07 at 3:08 PM.
|
www.magegraf.com
Raiding is full of challenge. Sometimes there is fire. You have to not be in the fire.
|
|
|
04/03/07, 3:14 PM
|
#1985
|
|
King Hippo
Leito
Troll Rogue
No WoW Account
|
Yea, it'd be simple enough to model 1xab cycles, but when you start trying to find the optimal cycle for fight duration, refreshing becomes tricky since the more abs you put in the cycle, the more you have to throw in the ab/scorch cycle to refresh.
Either way the main thing personally that would be interesting to see would be if an arc/fire build can out damage a deep fire build in normal circumstances without having to worry about refreshing scorch, but I'm still skeptical... especially since with high enough +dmg, only arcane blast spam can top fireball spam.
|
Rogue at heart.
|
|
|
04/03/07, 3:22 PM
|
#1986
|
|
Do Not Stand In The Wizards
Gnome Mage
Cenarion Circle
|
In practice, an 8k pyro crit semi-reliably off an AP burst, timed with arcane potency, can be a huge impact... more than should be possible from a single attack. Of course you're talking about nearly 12k damage from an instant cast, followed by 13 more seconds of increased dps. And my spell damage isn't even that high, geared out tailors might push 13-14k with that burst..
So I think that's the only way arcane/fire could come out on top in practice.
@Leto: The issue is more complex, I'm already auto-calculating the optimal number of arcane blasts, this makes a good estimate of how "mana stats" impact dps potential. Intellect looks like a pretty bitchin stat with this setup. Unforunately blizz decided now would be a good time make intellect stop scaling up with gear... (anyone remember the old Arcanist set? Haha).
Anyway, the tables are pretty massive and I'd have to shift the logic more than a tad to add cycles over cycles. Doesn't seem worth it..
|
www.magegraf.com
Raiding is full of challenge. Sometimes there is fire. You have to not be in the fire.
|
|
|
04/03/07, 3:48 PM
|
#1987
|
|
Do Not Stand In The Wizards
Gnome Mage
Cenarion Circle
|
I just sent Kalman the new version with the fireballx2 cycle.
|
www.magegraf.com
Raiding is full of challenge. Sometimes there is fire. You have to not be in the fire.
|
|
|
04/03/07, 5:32 PM
|
#1988
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
Originally Posted by Vontre
I just sent Kalman the new version with the fireballx2 cycle.
|
Cool. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
04/03/07, 7:29 PM
|
#1989
|
|
Super Macho Man
<>
Orc Shaman
No WoW Account
|
Originally Posted by Vontre
I just sent Kalman the new version with the fireballx2 cycle.
|
And Kalman just uploaded it.
|
Melador> Incidentally, these last few pages are why people hate lawyers.
Viator> I really don't want to go all Kalman here.
Bury> Just imagine what the world would be like if you used your powers for good.
Clearly law school has done wonders for me.
|
|
|
04/03/07, 9:23 PM
|
#1990
|
|
Piston Honda
Draenei Death Knight
Ysera
|
Alright time for some stupid questions on the spread sheet.... first are you always assuming that scorch debuff is up on the mob? there is an option for winters chill but not scorch... and molten fury isn't figured into the calculations is it? as there is no total dmg done field.
bah even stupid question - the two attachments in this thread are either of them them correct or is a completely seperate file?
Last edited by kelben : 04/03/07 at 9:31 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
04/03/07, 9:27 PM
|
#1991
|
|
Super Macho Man
<>
Orc Shaman
No WoW Account
|
Originally Posted by kelben
Alright time for some stupid questions on the spread sheet.... first are you always assuming that scorch debuff is up on the mob? there is an option for winters chill but not scorch... and molten fury isn't figured into the calculations is it? as there is no total dmg done field.
|
|
Originally Posted by Vontre
4. Molten Fury: ACCOUNTED FOR. Just making that clear =). It's modeled as a 4% increase to all damage.
|
See quote.
|
Melador> Incidentally, these last few pages are why people hate lawyers.
Viator> I really don't want to go all Kalman here.
Bury> Just imagine what the world would be like if you used your powers for good.
Clearly law school has done wonders for me.
|
|
|
04/04/07, 12:28 PM
|
#1992
|
|
Mash in B
Clarence
Tauren Druid
No WoW Account
|
Enough spreadsheets and theorycraft. Who's going elementalist with me for this weekend's EOTS bonus honor?! Huh? Anyone?!
http://www.wowhead.com/?talent=RZVgGzf0cRZVVGbobxsbo
|
Inform your dealers and whores of my credit, and pour me a goddamned drink!
|
|
|
04/04/07, 12:51 PM
|
#1993
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
Originally Posted by Maligne
Enough spreadsheets and theorycraft. Who's going elementalist with me for this weekend's EOTS bonus honor?! Huh? Anyone?!
|
 I have been wondering if anyone has theorycrafted up some kind of crit/dam/stam rule of thumb. Something like:
1 stam = 2 +dam = 1.5 crit (<-- pulled out of thing air)
|
|
|
|
|
04/04/07, 12:53 PM
|
#1994
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
Originally Posted by kelben
are you always assuming that scorch debuff is up on the mob?
|
I believe scorch is assumed to be up. It would be cool if you turn it on/off though.
|
|
|
|
|
04/04/07, 2:10 PM
|
#1995
|
|
Mash in B
Clarence
Tauren Druid
No WoW Account
|
Originally Posted by Stein
 I have been wondering if anyone has theorycrafted up some kind of crit/dam/stam rule of thumb. Something like:
1 stam = 2 +dam = 1.5 crit (<-- pulled out of thing air)
|
Eh it would change depending on the context. Stam is worth more in PvP than PvE, for example.
|
Inform your dealers and whores of my credit, and pour me a goddamned drink!
|
|
|
04/04/07, 2:19 PM
|
#1996
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
Originally Posted by Maligne
Eh it would change depending on the context. Stam is worth more in PvP than PvE, for example.
|
Yeah, i meant to say for pvp. (it's not a very interesting question for pve)
I imagine the formula might change based on whether you're getting heals or not; the number of people on your team (one (duel) to five); maybe whether the opponent(s) are getting heals or not....
|
|
|
|
|
04/04/07, 3:23 PM
|
#1997
|
|
Mash in B
Clarence
Tauren Druid
No WoW Account
|
Originally Posted by Stein
Yeah, i meant to say for pvp. (it's not a very interesting question for pve)
I imagine the formula might change based on whether you're getting heals or not; the number of people on your team (one (duel) to five); maybe whether the opponent(s) are getting heals or not....
|
Or whether you're fire, frost, or arcane, which spells you're using, your playstyle, strategy for a given encounter, the phase of the moon, value of Uganda's GDP, or whether or not I had pizza for lunch.
Which I did.
|
Inform your dealers and whores of my credit, and pour me a goddamned drink!
|
|
|
04/04/07, 3:39 PM
|
#1998
|
|
Don Flamenco
|
....
Last edited by Stein : 04/04/07 at 3:46 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
04/04/07, 4:04 PM
|
#1999
|
|
Don Flamenco
Draenei Mage
Lightbringer
|
Originally Posted by Stein
 I have been wondering if anyone has theorycrafted up some kind of crit/dam/stam rule of thumb. Something like:
1 stam = 2 +dam = 1.5 crit (<-- pulled out of thing air)
|
Way too many variables to consider based on what you want to do against who, etc. etc., and it's all subjective. as mentioned by others above, get lots of everything.
|
|
|
|
|
04/04/07, 4:08 PM
|
#2000
|
|
Do Not Stand In The Wizards
Gnome Mage
Cenarion Circle
|
For pvp? Get resilience. And stamina. LOTS of resilience and stamina. PvP itemization is really simple now honestly, here's how it works. You go do pvp. The game will give you items. Those items, which you get from pvping, are the best possible pvp items for that slot.
|
www.magegraf.com
Raiding is full of challenge. Sometimes there is fire. You have to not be in the fire.
|
|
|
|