![]() |
WWS and 2.4 sample logs
Hi everyone,
Firstly I'd like to present myself for them how don't know me. I'm SOaD!, CM from Wow Web Stats. So as you know, 2.4 will change the way combat events are logged. We are currently working on a new parser rebuild from the scratch, and we need help to provide a functional parser as soon as possible. Anyone can help by providing some combat log file sample to us. The approach is detailled in the post in our forum here. If you have suggestions, we'll keep an eye on both threads, so feel free to post ideas. Thank you everyone, The WWS team |
Suggestions:
You guys are definitely the premier combat log analysis program right now, but the tools are clumsy in some regards and frustrating in others because its hard to see the data that we want sometimes. One huge feature request for you to consider. A large part of what people are using WWS for is comparisons between players on the same raid/parse or between two parses. ie, comparing rogue 1 and rogue 2 on a BT run, or comparing rogue 1's performance this week to the same encounter from the week before. I would envision something like a subversion diff selection, checkboxes allowing you select 2 parses for comparison. You could then display the stats for that player for both runs, as well as having a "differences" summary that would show things like differences in number of abilities used, damage done, crit rates, etc. |
Suggestions
- A feature where guilds could compare how they have improved on a fight over time. For example, if they could compare their dps on Illidan kills over a 2 month period. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Malan, you might want to have a look at http://www.wwsscoreboard.com. Basically they use their own dps formula which is far better at comparing one player performance between logs.
|
Yah but apparently that site only tracks people that are in the 'top 10' or something.
Apparently I'm rated #4 in the world for shaman DPS on Aran. Interesting I guess, but that's not showing a comparison between 2 people on a raid. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well a few things to note about the WWS Scoreboard:
1 - The scores only reflect guilds that have actually posted a WWS. So yah you may not be the 39th highest Spriest in the world, but you certainly are of the WWS parses that were submitted. 2 - they use the standard DPS/Time calculation instead of the default WWS 'instant DPS' calculation so the numbers will look different to you 3 - the default options for the scoreboard filter out anonymous reports so you're already looking at a smaller pool since it includes paid accounts only (although those are normally the people with higher dps anyways since they care enough about their raid to pay to preserve their logs) 4 - they have some sort of validity check on their logs. In my case, we had previously seen that our Aran kill (rated #7 on the scoreboard) was listed below some guys that had 20 people listed on the kill, or a log with 30,000 DPS. Obviously bad combat log files, and the scoreboard somehow filters those out already. |
Quote:
2) Doesn't using this method expose the dps calculation to skew pretty badly for healing bosses (Anatheron, HWN, etc)? I suppose a guild that doesn't put up a healing debuff till half way through a particular fight might not deserve high rankings either. I can see it both ways I suppose. 3) Agreed 4) Noted |
Edit: Sorry i can't read today.
|
The request was for logs as well as suggestions for WWS.
|
From what I've heard, WWS Scoreboard manually updates their stuff. Thats why only guilds with Top 100 kills, non-anonymous and non-'cheating' logs get added.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Here's a sample combatlog I just "generated" by attacking a random NPC on 2.4 PTR sunwell.
I post it here, for any interested Addon programmer. It's not much but it is certainly enough to start redoing the parsers: |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 7:36 AM. |
Forum Infrastructure by vBulletin 3.6.12 ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.