Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Urban Rivals
Forums
New Posts


Go Back   Elitist Jerks > Public Discussion > User Interface and AddOns
Elitist Jerks Login

gamerDNA Login

Welcome to Elitist Jerks
We're testing some new features on the site regarding OpenID registration and coordination with gamerDNA. If you experience any issues with registering an account, please take the time to fill out a report and send it to this e-mail address. We would appreciate any assistance you could provide in making sure everything is functioning as intended. Thanks!

If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ and the forum rules. Users must register to post and new registrations are subject to a one day "mute" period to get acquainted with the community.

Reply
 
LinkBack (7) Thread Tools
Old 03/10/09, 10:05 PM   #26
Shadowed
Bald Bull
 
Tauren Druid
 
Mal'Ganis
Well there you go Paladin Buffer : WoWInterface Downloads : Beta-version AddOns enjoy.

The buff frame still needs work, it's probably going to get changed to use the class icon, then have the greater/single timers on the right side since I can reduce the frame width then, but they work well enough to release now at least.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/12/09, 11:31 AM   #27
Silmemir
Glass Joe
 
Human Paladin
 
Runetotem (EU)
Originally Posted by Shadowed View Post
It's not going to have the same amount of options (If any) to change how the buff frame looks, right now you can set how many columns to use, show the entire frame, show class frames, hide in combat and scale. But special settings such as texture, font, etc isn't something I plan on.
Thanks for the answer, figured it was worth a shot. I think the skins/borders you have on there are very nice anyway - a million times better than PP! - and will probably integrate well with most people's Ace-based UIs (pitbull etc). So, not a real disincentive to switch
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/12/09, 1:37 PM   #28
Exemplar
King Hippo
 
Human Paladin
 
Scarlet Crusade
Regarding Symbols of Kings - is it possible to query on zoning/resurrection, rather than every single buff? Getting an estimate on zone in is good enough overall. Querying on death is nice for heavy progression-wipe situations. It would be significantly less overhead than query on every buff, but also provide useful data for raid/class leaders.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/12/09, 2:34 PM   #29
Disenchant
Glass Joe
 
Gnome Warlock
 
Hellscream (EU)
While on the subject of blessing and buffing etc, can anyone recommend on a good addon that not only can manage pally buffing (i.e. assign buffs to every pally in raid) but also manage all other buffing in raid (i.e. priests, mages, druids etc)? ZOMGBuffs does a confusing job with it even for pallys, and Pallypower is really annoying with it as well...
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/12/09, 6:51 PM   #30
Shadowed
Bald Bull
 
Tauren Druid
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by Exemplar View Post
Regarding Symbols of Kings - is it possible to query on zoning/resurrection, rather than every single buff? Getting an estimate on zone in is good enough overall. Querying on death is nice for heavy progression-wipe situations. It would be significantly less overhead than query on every buff, but also provide useful data for raid/class leaders.
Correct me if I'm wrong on this, but at most a Paladin is going to be using 10 Symbols per an attempt. Maybe 12-13 if you want to add people arriving late and such, so all you really need to know is: Do they have over 200, 100, 50. Because 100/200 you know they are still fine for a while, and if they are below 50 then they'll need more in an attempt or two.

What that would mean is, on a refresh it will send the actual number of symbols when you drop below 200, 100 or 50 it sends a status update. It's something I'll consider.

Originally Posted by Silmemir View Post
Thanks for the answer, figured it was worth a shot. I think the skins/borders you have on there are very nice anyway - a million times better than PP! - and will probably integrate well with most people's Ace-based UIs (pitbull etc). So, not a real disincentive to switch
Since the status colors aren't descriptive enough, going to add an option for those anyway to make it more clear, next push will let you set the border color as well.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/13/09, 3:05 PM   #31
SeanDamnit
Piston Honda
 
SeanDamnit's Avatar
 
Draenei Paladin
 
Ner'zhul
Originally Posted by Disenchant View Post
While on the subject of blessing and buffing etc, can anyone recommend on a good addon that not only can manage pally buffing (i.e. assign buffs to every pally in raid) but also manage all other buffing in raid (i.e. priests, mages, druids etc)? ZOMGBuffs does a confusing job with it even for pallys, and Pallypower is really annoying with it as well...
Is this needed anymore now that MotW, Fort, and Intel are raid wide? I would have seen a value in this when assigning who buffs groups 1/2 and who buffs 3/4/5, but now that you just need one person to do it, it just seems like a matter of yelling: DRUIDS..BUFF! in vent.

(I call out druids in particular...for some reason they never friggin buff without being yelled at)

Card carrying member of the Inapropriately in Love with Hilary Duff Society.

"Yeah, well, if we could all get what we want I would be eating dinner out of Hilary Duff's skull right now" - Salabesh
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/13/09, 3:53 PM   #32
Tzeni
Piston Honda
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Bonechewer
Originally Posted by SeanDamnit View Post
Is this needed anymore now that MotW, Fort, and Intel are raid wide? I would have seen a value in this when assigning who buffs groups 1/2 and who buffs 3/4/5, but now that you just need one person to do it, it just seems like a matter of yelling: DRUIDS..BUFF! in vent.

(I call out druids in particular...for some reason they never friggin buff without being yelled at)
[Wild Spineleaf]

At 50s per buff, it's the most expensive raid buff of any class. Assigning buffs can help people who are too cheap with raid buffs, since it makes single buffing much easier.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/13/09, 5:43 PM   #33
Zakariya
Von Kaiser
 
Orc Shaman
 
Kil'Jaeden
Originally Posted by SeanDamnit View Post
Is this needed anymore now that MotW, Fort, and Intel are raid wide? I would have seen a value in this when assigning who buffs groups 1/2 and who buffs 3/4/5, but now that you just need one person to do it, it just seems like a matter of yelling: DRUIDS..BUFF! in vent.

(I call out druids in particular...for some reason they never friggin buff without being yelled at)
Well, yes. As raid buffs and debuffs are now merged and non-stackable, a mod to manage and assign who is doing what would be really nice. For example, if the mod knew about pally blessings, totems, and the various buffs that some specs have to apply (Imp. Faerie Fire) vs. those that are automatic (Misery), it would let you assign who is primarily responsible for what and then broadcast that to the players. Granted these aren't per-class, they way paladin buffs are, but it would assist with the process of ensuring that all possible buffs are covered.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/13/09, 5:59 PM   #34
Exemplar
King Hippo
 
Human Paladin
 
Scarlet Crusade
You could also coordinate Paladin auras. If it could also track who is currently using which aura, that'd be awesome. It's always annoying to try to figure out who has Crusader Aura on.

Rock: "We're sub-standard DPS. Nerf Paper, Scissors are fine."
Paper: "OMG, WTF, Scissors!"
Scissors: "Rock is OP and Paper are QQers. We need PvP buffs."
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/13/09, 6:20 PM   #35
 frmorrison
Divine Protector
 
frmorrison's Avatar
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by Exemplar View Post
You could also coordinate Paladin auras. If it could also track who is currently using which aura, that'd be awesome. It's always annoying to try to figure out who has Crusader Aura on.
I'd rather not see more features added, I prefer mods that do just one thing.

Just yell at the other Paladins until it gets swapped.

DK - Ashbane Failure is the condiment that gives success its flavor.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/14/09, 12:02 PM   #36
Disenchant
Glass Joe
 
Gnome Warlock
 
Hellscream (EU)
Originally Posted by SeanDamnit View Post
Is this needed anymore now that MotW, Fort, and Intel are raid wide? I would have seen a value in this when assigning who buffs groups 1/2 and who buffs 3/4/5, but now that you just need one person to do it, it just seems like a matter of yelling: DRUIDS..BUFF! in vent.

(I call out druids in particular...for some reason they never friggin buff without being yelled at)
Druids are the most problematic with us as well...

The thing is that I use XRS to see buffing status on my raid, and as RL I wanna have my raid buffed up to the max at all time, even during trash, not to mention that I want some order in the raid concerning who's buffing what. I can understand why it will be unfair for 1 priest to keep on buffing Fort/Spirit/Shadow Resist every time that a single person dies in the raid, therefore we also use the 30 min versions, and for that you need to have designated priests (or mages/druids etc) for the job. Beside, that way I'll have a name to yell at when buffing ain't done.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/16/09, 2:25 AM   #37
NaysaHyjal
Glass Joe
 
Draenei Paladin
 
Hyjal
I tried out the mod and it seems to work great. I have one issue with it which is the same issue I had with PallyPower. I'll try to explain it as cleanly as I can. Let's just assume we're already on patch 3.1 here so we all have access to kings for simplification.

I normally don't have 4 paladins in a raid other than 25-man raids. In a 10-man it's usually me and one or two others. So let's say I have 3 paladins in a raid. Being a protection paladin I'd love to have sanctuary, kings, and might in that order. Here's a diagram of buffs from each paladin detailing the issue:

Paladin 1 (Me, has Imp. Might): Greater Kings + single Sanctuary on me
Paladin 2 (has Imp. Wisdom): Greater Wisdom + single Kings on me
Paladin 3 (has Imp. Might): Greater Might

Apologies for the very rough looking table but that generally looks something like this.

(Warrior, Rogue, Priest, Druid, Paladin, Hunter, Mage, Warlock, Shaman, Deathknight)
- W R P D P H M W S D
1 K K K K K K K K K K
2 - - W W W W W W W -
3 M M - M M M - - M M

Using this method of buffing I'm perfectly able to set a single Sanctuary blessing on myself. The problem is that I cannot set a single Kings on myself from Paladin 2 (presumably because the addon thinks I'm already getting this buff). Now, I could buff Might on Paladins and Paladin 3 could buff Kings, however, I want that Might also! Therefore, that's not a viable solution in my book. Sure, it works, but it's not ideal. Also, with just the 2 paladins, me and Paladin 2, Paladin 2 wouldn't benefit from Might since he's obviously Holy and would benefit from Kings much more.

My suggestion is to allow single blessings to be set all the time. That is, don't disable the setting of a single blessing just because the Greater blessing is set.

Last edited by NaysaHyjal : 03/16/09 at 2:36 AM. Reason: grammer, table
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/16/09, 3:00 AM   #38
Shadowed
Bald Bull
 
Tauren Druid
 
Mal'Ganis
You might be using an older version, the ability to set single blessings even if there was a greater already assigned should have been added back in in a push a few days ago.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/17/09, 11:13 AM   #39
Mordekhuul
Don Flamenco
 
Orc Warlock
 
Terenas
Are there any key improvements of your mod over ZOMGBuffs that you can identify? We use ZOMG, and after the initial (admittedly long) learning curve, it does a lot more than pallypower ever did, including generating buff assignments fairly accurately down to and including single target buffs, based on a priority system you can configure.

I'm not sure those of us wanting a method to check on all raid buffs would push to change to a new mod that does only paladin buffs, but definitely would consider it if new functionality was on the table.

I understand if the goal is not to add features ZOMG didn't have, but to provide a simpler, cleaner mod that only handles paladin auras. I typically also prefer single-purpose mods. Its just that ZOMG currently does what I need it to do for paladins and gives me a raid wide view of most other buffs as well just by hovering over the icon.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/17/09, 5:11 PM   #40
Shadowed
Bald Bull
 
Tauren Druid
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by Mordekhuul View Post
Are there any key improvements of your mod over ZOMGBuffs that you can identify? We use ZOMG, and after the initial (admittedly long) learning curve, it does a lot more than pallypower ever did, including generating buff assignments fairly accurately down to and including single target buffs, based on a priority system you can configure.

I'm not sure those of us wanting a method to check on all raid buffs would push to change to a new mod that does only paladin buffs, but definitely would consider it if new functionality was on the table.

I understand if the goal is not to add features ZOMG didn't have, but to provide a simpler, cleaner mod that only handles paladin auras. I typically also prefer single-purpose mods. Its just that ZOMG currently does what I need it to do for paladins and gives me a raid wide view of most other buffs as well just by hovering over the icon.
My goal once 3.1 comes, is to add the ability to do fairly smart assignments including single blessings. It's mostly just a pain because even assigning greater blessings right now the logic (at least doing it cleanly) is a bit annoying, since 3.1 makes it easier to detect specs it'll have to wait for that.

Any sort of auto single assignments will not be priority based thought and fully automatic, or at least as automated as it can get.

I haven't used ZOMGBuffs so I can't comment on it, from the screenshots I've seen of it, it probably doesn't do anything special that it doesn't, just with a simpler UI.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/18/09, 6:41 AM   #41
Zelok
Glass Joe
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Dethecus
A way to open the assignment window without using a slash command or a macro of the slash command would be nice. Or is this feature there already and I'm just missing it?
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/18/09, 11:14 PM   #42
Kuthumii
Banned
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Thrall
Originally Posted by Zelok View Post
A way to open the assignment window without using a slash command or a macro of the slash command would be nice. Or is this feature there already and I'm just missing it?
Not built in that I know of but you can use this

Broker Paladin Buffer : WoWInterface Downloads : Data Broker

It isn't stand alone you need a ldb display addon also.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 03/25/09, 3:37 PM   #43
Shadowed
Bald Bull
 
Tauren Druid
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by Zelok View Post
A way to open the assignment window without using a slash command or a macro of the slash command would be nice. Or is this feature there already and I'm just missing it?
The LDB mod Kuthumii linked is your only option really, I don't plan on adding minimap support as I find it to be ugly, and a waste of code anyway.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 04/01/09, 8:11 AM   #44
Noobies
Glass Joe
 
Gnome Warlock
 
Lightbringer
So much Pally Power hate, yet none of you bothered to visit the official support forum to voice their concerns. Instead you guys prefer to bitch on a private forum the author had no access too. Only thanks to Google I was able to find it.

Wait 'till you see PallyPower 3.1
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 04/01/09, 11:55 AM   #45
Shadowed
Bald Bull
 
Tauren Druid
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by Noobies View Post
So much Pally Power hate, yet none of you bothered to visit the official support forum to voice their concerns. Instead you guys prefer to bitch on a private forum the author had no access too. Only thanks to Google I was able to find it.

Wait 'till you see PallyPower 3.1
EJ is hardly a private forum, and the author is not restricted from accessing it either.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 04/01/09, 9:32 PM   #46
Kuthumii
Banned
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Thrall
Originally Posted by Noobies View Post
So much Pally Power hate, yet none of you bothered to visit the official support forum to voice their concerns. Instead you guys prefer to bitch on a private forum the author had no access too. Only thanks to Google I was able to find it.

Wait 'till you see PallyPower 3.1
How would you know if we have or haven't made posts on the PP forums? You know all of our diffrent forum names?


Sorry Shadowed. I was unable to get the majority of my fellow paladins to switch over. Few didn't mind but others didn't like "change."

I ran into no errors over the course of 3 or 4 raids though if that is anything.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 04/02/09, 7:54 AM   #47
Noobies
Glass Joe
 
Gnome Warlock
 
Lightbringer
Originally Posted by Kuthumii View Post
How would you know if we have or haven't made posts on the PP forums? You know all of our diffrent forum names?
Maybe because I'm an author?
PallyPower has an official support thread on WoWace.com + Curse.com (comments) + CurseForge.com (tickets) + WowInterface.com (not active since there is not much activity). I check them multiple times every day.
All major enhancement request such as pet support, lesser blessings, custom templates, auto-assignments, skins, righteous fury, aura and seal support, minimized screen footprint - all of them were addressed.

So what's your problem?
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 04/02/09, 8:05 AM   #48
 Mouce
Von Kaiser
 
Blood Elf Paladin
 
Mal'Ganis
Originally Posted by Noobies View Post
Maybe because I'm an author?
PallyPower has an official support thread on WoWace.com + Curse.com (comments) + CurseForge.com (tickets) + WowInterface.com (not active since there is not much activity). I check them multiple times every day.
All major enhancement request such as pet support, lesser blessings, custom templates, auto-assignments, skins, righteous fury, aura and seal support, minimized screen footprint - all of them were addressed.

So what's your problem?
I think the point is you said these forums are private and you had no access to them. These forums have been around for as long as I can remember, so I'm not sure how you would not know about them.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 04/02/09, 9:52 AM   #49
Exemplar
King Hippo
 
Human Paladin
 
Scarlet Crusade
Originally Posted by Noobies View Post
Maybe because I'm an author?
PallyPower has an official support thread on WoWace.com + Curse.com (comments) + CurseForge.com (tickets) + WowInterface.com (not active since there is not much activity). I check them multiple times every day.
All major enhancement request such as pet support, lesser blessings, custom templates, auto-assignments, skins, righteous fury, aura and seal support, minimized screen footprint - all of them were addressed.

So what's your problem?
There are multiple mods that handle cooldowns, bars, unit frames, boss timers, loot comparison, questing, item sets, etc, etc, etc. Some people do not like the interface/implementation of one perfectly viable and usable mod, others do not like a given mod's competitor.

Just because it works properly doesn't mean it's what everyone wants. Does an author really want comments along the lines of "Hi, your mod works fine, I just want it to look completely different, communicate with other players' copies of it differently, and also bake cookies. Can you do that for me?" Why would any author with a working and accepted mod want to redesign it totally for a portion of the populace? That's where competition should step in.

Is there something inherently wrong with someone attempting to cover the same territory (buff assignments) in a different fashion? Shadowed desired a different way of doing this, so created the mod for personal use and decided to offer it to the public.

If a "product" is superior it will sell itself over its competitors - especially when they're all free. Let PallyPower prove itself superior and stop complaining. If you find that this mod has some features which are superior to PallyPower - steal the concept (not the code) and implement similar yourself. Even Blizzard does this in WoW (example: other games have had achievements for years) - it's how competition works.

Rock: "We're sub-standard DPS. Nerf Paper, Scissors are fine."
Paper: "OMG, WTF, Scissors!"
Scissors: "Rock is OP and Paper are QQers. We need PvP buffs."
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Old 04/02/09, 4:20 PM   #50
supplicium
Don Flamenco
 
supplicium's Avatar
 
Gnome Warlock
 
Alterac Mountains
There is also the other standards of being the only product on the market.

Simultaneously you are both the best and worst product out there. There is little need to adapt to change and as there is no competition there is no one to try and "One-up". Pally power has gone virtually unchanged in many of the major functionality the entire time it's been around. It's encompassed the blizzard coding that helps pallies but it never truly grew beyond what it started as. While any one who designed pally power is truly a good designer, the lack of intrinsic changes to appearance for a mod that is shown at all times pretty much is a shame, and I know from my experience and listening to the pallies I play with that appearance is one of the main dislikes of PP.

The other changes suggestions listed here are very nice as well. and it's not that people hate your addon, its the fact that people want a choice.

The character linked in your profile appears to be below level 10. This may account for your poor Patchwerk DPS.
 
User is offline.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Elitist Jerks > Public Discussion > User Interface and AddOns

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can pally/rogue beat pally/warrior? Erandan Player vs. Player 34 06/22/07 7:07 PM
Suggestions Wanted: Getting a Sub-4 Hour MC Clear Ashuko Public Discussion 44 08/14/06 2:24 PM
hmm, inner fire feedback wanted from dev's Jo_ Public Discussion 23 02/11/06 5:06 AM