Rule 1: We don't expect your English to be perfect. Honest mistakes are fine. Your communication issues are lazy style issues though, and you should fix them. Don't use ellipses or "etc" instead of proper punctuation. And (especially!) don't use lazy chat-speak abbreviations like "ofc, "u," "tbh," and "srsly."
Rule 6: Maybe you're right. Maybe DW is better than 2H. Provide math or logs for evidence to support your position though, or your findings aren't helpful.
Is there a definitive answer to the "DW VS 2H" topic?
I've been searching for some time, but I just can't seem to find the answer. My personal experience tend to show me that DW does higher DPS *I even have blue weapons, while my 2H spec has a ilvl 219 polearm*, but a lot of people say 2H does just as much DMG.
What must I do?
First my english is so poor...
So, TBH I play DW frost from patch 3.3.3... So now after lot of raid, etc etc, i can play this spec without any problem, rotation etc.
So DW or 2H , that's a gamestyle ofc but, U can see on my armory i got 264 weapons (saurfang hc want give me him BVB from 4 months..). And I'm before 2H frost Shadowmourne + 2H UH on all the fight in term of damage on boss (18K5 on rotface , SM was 18K.), the 2 DK with me are a great player and got all full 277 ilvl item. I can't imaginate my damage with full ilvl 277, probably 20-21k on rotface/saurfang , that's awesome.
And to answer correctly, TBH I think 2H frost is not really the best spec against DW frost/UH, srsly.