Post:
[Elemental] Cataclysm Discussion - Patch 4.3
User:
Shaamah
Infraction: 1. All posters are to make an effort to communicate clearly.
Points: 0
Administrative Note:
Message to User:
|
Don't use chat-speak abbreviations like "lol." Don't use ellipses instead of proper punctuation.
|
Original Post:
Originally Posted by aggixx
The biggest flaw, by far, with your idea is that you will never have double haste barring Sinestra-like buffs.
|
Wow... just wow... Idiot of the week award goes to me then lol Is it possible for you to test reapplying the dot while BL AND EM are up? It feels like 50% more lavasurge procs at a time we have 2k more mastery and 50% haste should weight better than it does. There also could be some merit to reapplying FS at the beginning of multiple haste buffs during specific phases in encounters (BL during hagara stun) for example.
This could also prove to be a stronger opener on fights too, delaying the first flameshock for elemental mastery/insignia/power torrent procs as it will not be clipping an existing flameshock. The math there is simply whether or not wasting a global during EM is worth it, and wether delaying lavabursts+FS to spam LB until procs is too much of a dps loss.
Other than that though you're seeming seems to have disproven the theory more than enough.
|
12/21/11, 10:02 AM
Similar Threads
