Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » The Dung Heap » The Banhammer

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01/20/12, 7:57 PM   #1
♦ Carebare
::stare::
 
Carebare's Avatar
 
Tauren Druid
 
Mal'Ganis
Warning for Blueobelisk: 6. Do not post unless you have something new and worthwhile to say.

Post: Cataclysm Fire Mage Compendium
User: Blueobelisk
Infraction: 6. Do not post unless you have something new and worthwhile to say.
Points: 0

Administrative Note:

Message to User:
Dummy testing != damage in a raid situation. Additionally, you do not have to link your armory; it's in your profile. Thanks.
Original Post:
Originally Posted by rh8452 View Post
The incoming fire nerf is something like 4% overall damage,
Actually I did a 3 minute patchwerk rotation on a dummy and did a few calculations based on it (for perspective I have 2 piece t12 2 piece t13 (Armory link here Blueobelisk @ Firetree - Game - World of Warcraft)):

With 40.3% of my damage coming from Fireball and 7.8% of my damage coming from Pyroblast!, I got that with the 6% Fireball and 6% Pyroblast nerf I would have lost 5.9% of my total damage.

This number is subject to change, lowering the % overall nerf when movement is taken into account and you're forced to cast more scorches, effectively lowering the damage lost. But when considering Ignite DoT damage from Fireballs and Pyroblasts(!) as well as DoT damage lost from Combustions (especially with extra Combustions with T13 4 piece that I don't have) the overall % nerf increases. I also assume the Pyroblast nerf doesn't affect Pyroblast DoT.

However, as you mentioned the nerf isn't nearly enough to force us to switch to Arcane at all (except for the specific encounters some already switch for (Ultraxion possibly and Spine)),

United States Offline
 

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » The Dung Heap » The Banhammer

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Infraction for Blueobelisk: 10. Do not respond to terrible posts. Wizeowel The Banhammer 0 09/26/11 4:58 PM
Warning for Blueobelisk: 10. Do not respond to terrible posts. Wizeowel The Banhammer 0 07/07/11 3:52 PM
Infraction for Blueobelisk: 6. Do not post unless you have something new and worthwhile to say. Wizeowel The Banhammer 0 05/26/11 5:28 PM
Warning for sno: 6. Do not post unless you have something new and worthwhile to say. Narcosleepy The Banhammer 0 02/25/10 2:10 PM
Warning for Lua: 6. Do not post unless you have something new and worthwhile to say. constantius The Banhammer 0 06/19/09 8:42 AM