Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » The Banhammer

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06/13/07, 2:10 PM   #1
Kaubel
Sledgehammer Emeritus
 
Kaubel's Avatar
 
Tauren Druid
 
Mal'Ganis
Infraction for Etre: Grammar

Post: Rage generation and the Prot Warrior
User: Etre
Infraction: Grammar
Points: 1

Administrative Note:Message to User:
Check your u's at the door, Mister.
Original Post:
Interesting posts. Few coments :

1) High avodaince it is bad for rage / threat generation, but:
- at bosses u will have anyway decent rage
- trash can be usually taunted back
- immune to taunt mobs are handdled with caution anyway by the hole raid.
- what I have found to be a downside of high avodaince (dodge/parry/chance to be miss) it is that healers get the feeling of an easy fight and relax a bit.
- call for missdirection when u are in trouble, ask dps to slow for few secs.

2) Changing the way rage is generate it does involve some really big balance issues and is not to be seen in near future. Personally what I will prefer to have is a base rage generation when dealing / taking dmg (a X value) and a bonus rage in function of the amount of dmg dealt / taken (a Y value). So total will be rage= X (constant value) + Y(bonus- variable) instead of rage=Y (variable) as it (probably) is now.

United States Offline
 

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » The Banhammer

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Infraction for vex: Grammar Greybone The Banhammer 0 07/03/07 6:58 AM
Infraction for pooclops: Grammar/Profile Infraction Kaubel The Banhammer 0 07/02/07 9:36 AM
Infraction for Myk: Grammar Greybone The Banhammer 0 06/29/07 4:31 AM
Infraction for neg: Grammar Kaubel The Banhammer 0 04/22/07 6:39 PM
Infraction for Cth: Grammar Kaubel The Banhammer 0 04/11/07 8:02 PM