Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Chat
Forums
New Posts


Go Back   Elitist Jerks > The Dung Heap > The Banhammer

Welcome to Elitist Jerks
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ and the forum rules. Users must register to post and new registrations are subject to a one day "mute" period to get acquainted with the community. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools
Old 09/19/07, 4:43 PM   1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)
Unregistered is awesome.
 
Maniq's Avatar
 
Tauren Shaman
 
Mal'Ganis
Infraction for westcliff: Grammar

Post: [Rogue] DPS Spreadsheet
User: westcliff
Infraction: Grammar
Points: 1

Administrative Note:

Message to User:
Spell check your posts.

Learn English.

Learn how to capitalise.

Then you are allowed to post.
Original Post:
sorry if that has been asked already but i kinda am too lazy to read up the last 30 pages.

would with the right spec grace of air outpreform wf in a 2xrogue, druid, shaman, warrior group in terms of overall group dps?

ok. i switched around in the spreadsheet a bit. and came up with this spec (combat swords):

Talent Calculator - World of Warcraft

now i dropped out wf for grace of air and put instant poisen on the mainhand.

my Raid & potion buffed stats:
291 hit
3036 ap
31% crit

using 2 merc swords. no haste (except for abacus)

i came up with 6.72 less dps. but now if you consider wf doesen't help a dps druid at all. and a shaman already has his wf enchant on his weapon. woulden't grace of air be better for the overall group dps? or would it hurt the dps warrior too much? i have no experience with warriors at all therefor the question

[edit]

ok if the shaman has improved totems i woulden't loose any dps at all. its exactly 0.00 on my spreadsheet
 
User is online.
 

Go Back   Elitist Jerks > The Dung Heap > The Banhammer

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Infraction for xEw: Grammar Kaubel The Banhammer 0 08/22/07 3:26 PM
Infraction for whi: Grammar Maniq The Banhammer 0 07/11/07 6:01 AM
Infraction for pooclops: Grammar/Profile Infraction Kaubel The Banhammer 0 07/02/07 10:36 AM
Infraction for Yur: Grammar Kaubel The Banhammer 0 05/09/07 8:51 PM
Infraction for Cth: Grammar Kaubel The Banhammer 0 04/11/07 9:02 PM