Infraction for Vannik: Grammar

Kaubel · 12/08/07, 6:36 PM

Post: [Mage] TC after 2.3
User: Vannik
Infraction: Grammar
Points: 1

Administrative Note:

Message to User:

"Some of us are actually people with advanced degrees in the sciences and arn't very dumb and like intelectual conversations without people getting angry when they are questioned. I recommend you never get a Ph.D."

I wanted to point out the irony. You know, just in case that degree plan of yours skipped over such things.

Original Post:

Didn't know you moderated the boards, but you seem to be getting quite angry when people question your math. I understand the GCD will effect the fireball after the fireblast. . .

I'll PM you sir, but please, don't tell me I am wrong when I am not. I admit the way you calculated fireball latency wasn't as clearly set up as your fireblast rotation, so I assumed you did both wrong. (you proved one, not the other, the one proved was incorrect, so logically. . . ) Comparing such small parses coupled with different times of logging in could definately add +12 mslag /second that you get with the GCD effect on fireblast rotation.

Please, next time you have a problem with someone when they prove you are incorrect, don't take so much offense to it, and explain your math. Some of us are actually people with advanced degrees in the sciences and arn't very dumb and like intelectual conversations without people getting angry when they are questioned. I recommend you never get a Ph.D.

PM incoming

P.S. Like my initial post that started this conversation, which is why ebbv posted all this to begin with, I did all my calculations to prove that +Dmg isn't what makes the rotation for fireball spam, it's dependent on haste. All this conversation has said is that i need to add 0.012 ms/sec of casting, which still with no haste, and taking into effect 10% of fireblast ignites going out due to bug, it's still favoring the 3/1 rotation.