Warning for Stryker159: Grammar

Kaubel · 01/04/08, 7:13 AM

Post: [Raid] Executioner vs. Mongoose, preliminary numbers
User: Stryker159
Infraction: Grammar
Points: 0

Administrative Note:

Message to User:

You have a strange habit of capitalizing the beginning of only half of your sentences. Try not to do that.

Original Post:

ok, time for the math i suggested running in my last post.

by using the formula DR=Armour / (Armour + 11960) to get the Damage reduction to physical damage on a Boss level mob, and 444 DPS as base using executioner, 483.6 DPS as base using mongoose, the following is the DPS gains from each enchant at certian armour levels.

Armour          Base DPS          DPS with Mongoose          Armour value with Executioner          DPS with Executioner
5000            313.1088                 341.03472                            4160                            330.1584
4000            332.7336                 362.40984                            3160                            351.8256
3000            354.9780                 386.63820                            2160                            376.5564
2000            380.3748                 414.30012                            1160                            405.0612
1000            409.7676                 446.31444                             160                             438.1836
0                 444                      483.6                                0                               444

From this, it would appear that at a equal uptime, Mongoose is the better enchant to get, regardless of armour. The only thing i can see going to Executioners favour is if it has a greater proc rate then mongoose, which doesnt appear to be the case.

this is going by single enchant. would need to get more DPS values from Tazzy comparing DW Mong and Mong/Exe to get better results. Mong/Exe would be the same as the current Mong single enchant. just need a double mong from ya.

EDIT: This result is for rogues. scince Mongoose doesnt give warriors AP, it would be different results for them. Let me see if i can crunch some more numbers and get back to you guys.