02/17/08, 11:04 AM
|
#1
|
|
Sledgehammer Emeritus
|
Infraction for Champions: Grammar
Post: 2.4 PTR and Patch Notes
User: Champions
Infraction: Grammar
Points: 1
Administrative Note:
Message to User:
|
That is a long, run-on sentence you have there. The argument is kind of silly too if you want to get right down to it.
|
Original Post:

Originally Posted by flyingtoastr
No, the OH isn't terrible for Warriors. However, thanks to the WW change warriors do benefit a lot more from having a fat slow offhand as opposed to the other class that can use the glaives, Rogues. Rogues *need* a fast offhand for Combat Potency procs, and don't use any attack that specifically strikes with their offhand weapon in a raid (so the damage range isn't as important). Rogues will benefit a lot more than any warrior from having the set, no matter how you slice it. The only time I ever see our Warriors whipping out fast swords is when the boss hits 20%, as opposed to our Rogues who use them 100% of the fight.
The only situation where you will see any Warrior taking a offhand Glaive is if all the Rogues have it first. To the best of my knowledge, no guild is at that point, so its a very moot discussion.
|
You are completely misinformed, I'm sorry but this is what i believe , I can guaranty warriors got it over rogues and it is also one of the best OH for a warrior, I'm not disregarding that its better for a rogue its the fact that you say a slower OH for a fury warrior is better when i know for a fact its not really the case.
|
|
|
|
|
|