Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Chat
Forums
New Posts


Go Back   Elitist Jerks > The Dung Heap > The Banhammer

Welcome to Elitist Jerks
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ and the forum rules. Users must register to post and new registrations are subject to a one day "mute" period to get acquainted with the community. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05/16/08, 8:58 AM   #1 (permalink)
Church of the Bristlecone
 
Kaubel's Avatar
 
Dextor
 
<Elitist Jerks>
No WoW Account
Infraction for benybenson: Grammar

Post: [Rogue] DPS Spreadsheet
User: benybenson
Infraction: Grammar
Points: 1

Administrative Note:

Message to User:
Remember this?

Lack of capitalization, misspelled words, and crazy line breaks make this post difficult to read. Please try to avoid these things with future postings. Thanks.
Original Post:
I think there is an logical bug in some armor penetration procc´s.
The problem is if you got a good debuffed boss with for example 6200 armor base and some passiv armor penetration,
you cant use your Executioner /WSC proccs completly cause your going lower than the 0 armor cap.

an an example:

without wsc

boss : 6200 armor
debuffs: -4010 ( 2600 sa /800 ff /610CoR)
passiv : -1500 (sw /bt gear)
armor left : 690


WSC ist calculatet with a average of -450~ armor this amout is addet too your passiv armor penetraion so you got:

boss : 6200 armor
debuffs: -4010 ( 2600 sa /800 ff /610CoR)
passiv : -1950 (sw /bt gear+WSC)
armor left : 240


But every WSC procc will hit the 0 armor cap ,and is just worth -690 armor not -1000 armor,
so the real average is around 300 -armor.
Same with Executioner and other procc´s like this.

Maybe its possibel to fix it, if you check the -armor spikes with base boss armor befor calculating the average.


Thanks for attention and keep up the good work.
 
User is offline.
 

Go Back   Elitist Jerks > The Dung Heap > The Banhammer

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Infraction for benybenson: Grammar Kaubel The Banhammer 0 04/18/08 9:11 PM
Infraction for T.K.: Grammar Greybone The Banhammer 0 10/05/07 3:58 AM
Infraction for pooclops: Grammar/Profile Infraction Kaubel The Banhammer 0 07/02/07 10:36 AM
Infraction for neg: Grammar Kaubel The Banhammer 0 04/23/07 9:02 AM
Infraction for neg: Grammar Kaubel The Banhammer 0 04/22/07 7:39 PM