Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Chat
Forums
New Posts


Go Back   Elitist Jerks > The Dung Heap > The Banhammer

Welcome to Elitist Jerks
If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ and the forum rules. Users must register to post and new registrations are subject to a one day "mute" period to get acquainted with the community. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools
Old 08/13/08, 3:17 PM   1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)
Stuckup Goon Squad Washout
 
LodeRunner's Avatar
 
Undead Warrior
 
Mal'Ganis
Infraction for Twin: Useless Post

Post: [Mage] WotLK Talent Preview / Discussion
User: Twin
Infraction: Useless Post
Points: 1

Administrative Note:

Message to User:
I was originally going to go off on a rant against you, but i decided to just copy/paste the original report someone made against this post because it was simple and elegant.
Quoted huge message, then made no real response to it. Also was a block of text that said essentially nothing that hadn't already been said. Also a bit of general idiocy in the post, including poor spelling/grammar.
Yeah, what he said.
Original Post:
Originally Posted by Qbert View Post
Koraas statement about utility/DPS compromises really hit a nerve for me. I really hope it was directed purely at the imp WE mana regen. It frustrates me whenever the changes to Imp Scorch & WC are even considered utility. They should by no means be treated as utility for DPS balance purposes, since they are specifically designed to boost the classes own DPS.

It seems that the only way Mages will have competitive DPS is when all Mage debuffs are present.It is like the devs realized the Mages lack of damage capability and opted to give the trees a few debuffs to close the gap.... then point to the exact same DPS-modifying debuffs as an example of utility, and thus a reason to nerf the damage!
I'm sorry but it just doesn't work both ways. Yes, the WC debuff will help Destruction Firelocks and Moonkin, and imp scorch will help Moonkin whereas it has always boosted Firelocks.... but Focus Magic is nothing but a damage spell with a different mechanic, and it seems like Mages are the only ones going OOM getting excited about the imp WE mana regen.

In the end, all this so-called utility is essentially Mage-only. Shaman, Priests, Warriors, Paladins, Rogues, Hunters and 2 out of 3 Warlock/Druid specs still couldn't care less if a Mage is brought to the raid. That sounds a lot more like liability than utility, and certainly not any reason to bring multiple Mages to a raid unless Mage DPS rivals Rogues.

As it stands now, I can easily see a raid justifiably bringing 0 Mages, 0 Destruction Warlocks & 0 Moonkin. The only way to redeem the classes/specs is ensuring that the three specs combined do more damage than any other 3 class/spec combination. Otherwise, you replace a Mage and lose Imp Scorch? Moonkin, Destrolock & Mage lose 10% damage. Lose WC & imp WE? Moonkin, Destrolock & Mage lose 10% crit & sustainability. Lose the Moonkin? Destrolock & Two Mages lose 5% crit and ~5% overall haste.

note: if you drop Mages, you might as well drop any Destruction Warlock too because 10% damage and 10% crit lost would cripple viability.

No matter how you swing it, 2 Mage specs, Destrolock and a Moonkin appear necessarily a package deal, or you lose 10% damage from each remaining source. Then, even if all are present, if they don't outdamage 4 rogues or 4 hunters or 2 rogues/1 enhance shaman/1 warrior, etc. etc. ... then theres no reason to ever bring them to raid for anything beyond gimmick AoE/spellsteal encounters. This is why having top DPS potential is so imperative if the specs remain the way they are; without the DPS potential the so-called "utility" is nigh useless and not worth the slot, because the main beneficiaries of the "utility" would be the lagging DPS classes.

OMG a mage that understands that a destrolock and mage are in the same boat. You should post this on the mage forums in wow cause all you see them do there is whine about how mages should not be equaled in range dps. What most of those fools don't realize is that if Destro lock DPS doesn't rival a mage there is no need to bring a destro lock at all to a raid ever. A demo lock will provide all the utility a lock can possibly offer now that Ebon Plague doesn't stack with CoE. Affliction our so called "debuff" tree has all its useful debuffs at the top of the tree that any lock can easily get. The bottom of the tree does nothing for the raid. Destruction does nothing for the raid. You will see at most 1 demo lock who is just their to put up CoR and One mage for the occasional if sheep these classes aren't given specs that can provide top end DPS that is right bellow rogues. Ideally Mages should have 2 primary dps specs and 1 utility spec. Warlocks should have 2 utility specs and 1 primary DPS spec. Affliction/Demo utility Destro primary DPS. For mages Arcane/Fire Primary DPS and Frost Utility. Affliction/Demo/and Frost should be doing about the same damage because of utility but arcane/fire/and destro needs to be doing amazing DPS. Hopefully this is where Blizz is trying to head with the classes.
 
User is offline.
 

Go Back   Elitist Jerks > The Dung Heap > The Banhammer

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Twin Emp Strategies GROGtheNailer Public Discussion 3 11/09/06 3:04 PM
Twin Emp Question Jordaina Public Discussion 47 09/22/06 10:42 AM
Twin emp Trash shreader Public Discussion 17 08/14/06 8:25 PM
Twin Emperors Down Praetorian News 53 03/23/06 1:41 PM
Twin Emps Mod mindspike Public Discussion 13 03/08/06 11:25 AM