Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Urban Rivals
Forums
New Posts


Go Back   Elitist Jerks > The Dung Heap > The Banhammer
Elitist Jerks Login

gamerDNA Login

Welcome to Elitist Jerks
We're testing some new features on the site regarding OpenID registration and coordination with gamerDNA. If you experience any issues with registering an account, please take the time to fill out a report and send it to this e-mail address. We would appreciate any assistance you could provide in making sure everything is functioning as intended. Thanks!

If this is your first visit, please be sure to check out the FAQ and the forum rules. Users must register to post and new registrations are subject to a one day "mute" period to get acquainted with the community.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08/20/08, 12:11 AM   #1
 LodeRunner
Feed me a stray cat
 
LodeRunner's Avatar
 
Undead Warrior
 
Mal'Ganis
Warning for TheNameLessOne: Grammar

Post: [Druid] Feral talents/abilities - WotLK preview / discussion
User: TheNameLessOne
Infraction: Grammar
Points: 0

Administrative Note:

Message to User:
I'm betting if you try real hard you can hammer out two more letters and instead of w/ you'd have 'with'.
Original Post:
Originally Posted by gnoop View Post
I have to disagree on this somewhat. While we know tanks aren't at 80 and we aren't able to see what the real issues are, we've at least got some blue comments that have created alarm - the comment about how it was nice to see high armor on Druids in TBC with a suggestion that such a thing is in the past, the comments about how a Druid's main mitigation is via a high health pool.

Many might be overstepping on the level of panic and paranoia, but it's probably safer to show some concern up front with the chance of getting better face time than to sit back and wait with the assumption that the devs will get to it and everything will be fine. Meanwhile, every other class is throwing out complaints about X, Y, and Z and getting looked at while we're getting a quick glance-over because no one's really complaining.

For right now, I'm showing concern and asking that Blizzard set aside the time they claim they will go give us a good review, get our itemization down, and go through the talents. Right now, we've got a Rogue itemization and we aren't sure if that's all we're looking at, if we'll get talents to compensate for a lack of high armor, or if we'll end up with bear leather vs. cat/rogue leather again. So far, the suggestion is that we get Rogue leather and they'll fix things up via talents. I'm waiting to see that as one of the talents that would have helped in this arena was wiped out in Alpha.
The big thing is the whole less mitigation but more stam comment. More stam is absolutely meaningless if you take significantly more damage. An arms warrior in full PVP gear socketed w/ stam will have more HP than a prot warrior but would still get obliterated on boss fights. High stam + low avoidance/mitigation == useless mana sponge that will run your healer OOM (assuming they can even survive a boss's attack rotation). Granted this is probably an extreme example.

Also the other thing to note is that warriors will not have significantly less stam due to them getting an extra slot w/ a bow/gun. Relic system is bad and goes against the whole shared itemization concept anyways.
 
User is offline.
 

Go Back   Elitist Jerks > The Dung Heap > The Banhammer

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Warning for mafields: Grammar Snowy The Banhammer 0 07/11/08 5:17 PM
Warning for CrK: Grammar Kaubel The Banhammer 0 04/24/08 6:19 PM
Warning for Sneen: Grammar Kaubel The Banhammer 0 01/02/08 2:26 AM
Warning for Kve: Grammar Greybone The Banhammer 0 10/31/07 7:28 AM
Warning for Lad: Grammar Kaubel The Banhammer 0 10/02/07 8:08 AM