Originally Posted by Zurai

You specifically asked us to correct you if the math was wrong. We did, and you took umbrage to it.

As for the comparative math, using your numbers and just correcting the rounding, we get 21.685 DPS and 42 MP5. Those are a 7.8% difference and a 5% difference, respectively. Simply by correcting one small rounding error, we got a result that was almost 10% different from your result. The actual magnitude of the numbers isn't big, true, but you give every indication that you'd use this same style of "math" in all cases, and when you're calculating expected DPS over an entire fight, a 7.8% difference can mean 200-300 actual DPS being lost in translation.

The amusing/frustrating thing about this is that you apparently don't even realize that, by ignoring the average case, you're making your entire conclusion vastly less reliable as you decrease your sample size, which is what you've given as the strength of your reasoning. As sample size decreases, the results will deviate more and more from the average, and you've said many times that you object to results deviating from the average by very much.