12/17/08, 10:36 PM
|
#1
|
|
Sledgehammer Emeritus
|
Infraction for OmniDo: Grammar
Post: WotLK Healing Compendium v3.0 [in progress]
User: OmniDo
Infraction: Grammar
Points: 1
Administrative Note:
Message to User:
You're not listening. Do not give each sentence its own line.
Take the next week to practice using paragraphs.
|
Original Post:

Originally Posted by Nurru
Please stop posting until you have actual experience and can use valid evidence to support your claims.
|
Perhaps you missed my point.
This is how I have healed in ALL my healing experience, pre-LK; Heroic, 10-man, 25-Man, etc.
Ive already stated that I heal primarily as a raid healer using Discipline/Holy.
The numbers and percentages havent changed, I dont go Out of mana, and people usually (95% of the time) dont die.
This perspective isnt "skewed", it is simply different.
I fail to see why people are shooting down the information I am offerring here, unless of course they simply cannot accept the concept that there are alternative methods to heal which may not specifically require the use of a spreadsheet.
If you like, I'll be happy to offer my results in Heroics, 10-mans, and 25-mans when that is available.
Perhaps I dont play like others do, or think as they do.
To me, healing is the most challenging aspect of the game due to its dynamic nature and everchanging variables.
Why is it then, that I can heal using different strategies without any issues, yet so many others here contend that I am a "noob"?
I can only conclude that those shooting me down cannot themselves accomplish what I have, and/or under the same circumstances, for <insert reason here> and are adopting the "Whack-a-mole" Hive-mentality as opposed to creative abstraction.
If screenshots of overeall healing and effective healing are not adequate "Evidence", what then would you reccomend as an acceptable alternative?
Apparently, semantic logic only incites arguments instead of productive discussion, and Raw numbers dont appeal to you either Nurru.
What would you suggest?
|
|
|
|
|
|