Elitist Jerks
Register
Blogs
Forums


Go Back   Elitist Jerks » The Dung Heap » The Banhammer

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02/06/09, 9:52 AM   #1
constantius
Soda Popinski
 
Pandaren Priest
 
Windrunner
Infraction for Kigale: 3. All discussion should be both polite and civil.

Post: WotLK Healing Compendium v3.0 [theorycraft, specs, etc]
User: Kigale
Infraction: 3. All discussion should be both polite and civil.
Points: 1

Administrative Note:

Message to User:
Unfortunately, you are mistaken about 3.0 mechanics, and you seem to have gotten lost somewhere. A hunter has no real business posting in a PvE-focused priest thread, unless you have a specific question regarding an alt, or theorycraft regarding a raid situation. Mearis was off-topic in referring to the poison cleanse specifically for pvp, and you were trolling in responding to him.
Original Post:
Originally Posted by Mearis View Post
PvP:

The lack of poison cleansing remains our biggest obstacle. Shamans got curse of tongues removal, paladins got 50% off curses, priests are still stuck with no way to remove viper sting and the worst active mana-regen.

They need to fix shadowfiend and vipersting and then priests are mostly fine.
This is not a valid concern. I'm sure it's annoying not being able to cure poison but each healing class has a similar restriction. Paladins can't cure curses, Druids cannot dispel, Shaman can't dispel defensively. Priests can offensively and defensively dispel 2 spells with 1 GCD, much better than the paladin or shaman equivalents. Although priests may have the worst active mana-regen as you claim (which wouldn't be by much if true) they have the best passive regen.

Complaining about viper sting is a little on the funny side to me after playing a hunter in level 70 arenas against priests and being burned dry within 3 GCDs.

Canada Offline
 

Go Back   Elitist Jerks » The Dung Heap » The Banhammer

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Infraction for zixa: 3. All discussion should be both polite and civil. Chicken The Banhammer 0 02/05/09 5:50 AM
Infraction for chefjeff: 3. All discussion should be both polite and civil. constantius The Banhammer 0 02/03/09 9:53 AM
Infraction for Flamingcloud: 3. All discussion should be both polite and civil. Aldriana The Banhammer 0 02/02/09 7:42 PM
Infraction for Xera81: 3. All discussion should be both polite and civil. Aldriana The Banhammer 0 01/30/09 4:53 PM
Warning for Kaprina: 3. All discussion should be both polite and civil. Juice The Banhammer 0 01/30/09 1:50 PM