02/11/09, 10:36 AM
|
#1
|
|
palpably superior comprehension
|
Infraction for darkstrike01: Bad posting on several levels.
Post: The Arcane thread
User: darkstrike01
Infraction: Bad posting on several levels.
Points: 1
Administrative Note:
Message to User:
About the only thing you did right with this post is not sign it.
1. Capitalize consistently. This means always capitalizing I when used as the first person pronoun, starting every sentence with a capital letter, etc.
2. Format your post properly. Use paragraphs, not seemingly-random line breaks, to keep your points orderly.
3. Hey first time poster NOBODY CARES.
4. Use punctuation. This includes ending every sentence with an appropriate mark, be it a period, question mark, or something more exotic.
You have two posts in our forums. Both of them have earned infractions. You may wish to improve your posting style before continuing here.
|
Original Post:

long time reader, first time poste
at the moment i'm using the glyghs of mage armor, AP and AB and with these changes the glygh of am seems to be a small buff in dmg,
with the numbers posted in the upcomming changes thread the crit dmg of AM out of Nathanbg's test is 2136 to 2294 (havent had a chance to run my own numbers yet)
because AM is only used on MB procs on a 3 stacked AB i see (based on nathan's numbers and the ab buff with glygh (54%))
please do correct me if im wrong:
3289.44 vs 3532.76, a difference of 243.32 per AM crit. used only on a prco that applies 20% of the time, then when i use it i have to rely on my ~43.5% crit full buffed with imp scorch etc. before i can get use of the glygh ( i have to not only proc Mbrg, we need to crit on that Mbrg) which feels a little like hotstreak
would it be worth using this new glypgh over another glygh mentioned above? feels a little more dependent on RNG which is one reoson I left FFB.
EDIT: removed question concering arcane barrae, it has been answered, just missed it
|
|
|
|
|
|